원자력 관련 정책 커뮤니케이션에 관한 상호인식 연구 : 일반 국민과 원전 직원 간의 상호지향성 분석
Mutual Perceptions between Nuclear Plant Employees and General Public on Nuclear Policy Communication Applying the Co-orientation Analysis Model
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines mutual perceptions between general public and nuclear plantemployees on understanding nuclear policy communication applying the co-orientation model. The total of 414 responses were analyzed including 211 of the general public and 203 of plantemployees. Results indicate that agreement between general public and plant employees is relativelyhigh, in that general public tends to have negative evaluation to nuclear policy communication,but plant employees tends to have positive one. In terms of congruence, general publicperceive that plant employees might have more positive evaluation than themselves, and nuclearplant employees perceive that general public might have more negative evaluation than themselves. Finally, in terms of accuracy, general public accurately estimate how nuclear plant employeesperceive on policy communication, whereas nuclear plant employees unaccurately estimate howgeneral public perceive on policy communication.
Abstract
This study examines mutual perceptions between general public and nuclear plantemployees on understanding nuclear policy communication applying the co-orientation model. The total of 414 responses were analyzed including 211 of the general public and 203 of plantemployees. Results indicate that agreement between general public and plant employees is relativelyhigh, in that general public tends to have negative evaluation to nuclear policy communication,but plant employees tends to have positive one. In terms of congruence, general publicperceive that plant employees might have more positive evaluation than themselves, and nuclearplant employees perceive that general public might have more negative evaluation than themselves. Finally, in terms of accuracy, general public accurately estimate how nuclear plant employeesperceive on policy communication, whereas nuclear plant employees unaccurately estimate howgeneral public perceive on policy communication.
참고문헌 (14)
- Chaffee SH, "Interpersonal Approaches Communication Research", ABS, 16(4), pp.469~499 (1973)
- Kasperson RE, "Communicating risks to the public: Internationalperspectives" (1991), Kluwer
- 김재범, "노사 커뮤니케이션 개념의 탐색적 고찰 상호지향성 모델의 적용 가능성", 홍보학연구, 14(3), pp.44~68 (2010), 한국PR학회[DOI]
- 김태진, "원자력의 사회적 위험에 대한 인식분석: 타 발전원들과의 비교분석을 중심으로", 국토연구, 55(4), pp.41~58 (2007), 국토연구원[DOI]
- 김원제, "위험커뮤니케이션의 구성요인 및 요인 간 영향관계에 관한 탐색 연구 : S-M-C-R-E 모델 적용을 통한 원자력 위험커뮤니케이션의 구조분석을 중심으로", 한국소통학보, (11), pp.80~123 (2009), 한국소통학회
- Kim YW, "Risk, crisis & communication" (2008), EWHA Womans University Press
- 이세민, "과학 커뮤니케이션 담론 변화에 따른 참여자 간 상호지향성 연구: 원자력 위험 커뮤니케이션에 대한 전문가와 일반인의 인식 비교", 한국언론학보, 56(1), pp.31~57 (2012), 한국언론학회
- 이영애, "위험지각의 심리적 차원", 인지과학, 16(3), pp.199~211 (2005), 한국인지과학회
- Oh MY, "Effective Communication Strategies for Promoting Understanding on Nuclear Energy", JPRR, 8(1), pp.192~215 (2004)
- 오미영, "위험을 수반한 과학기술의 낙인효과 : 원자력에 대한 위험인식이 방사선기술 이용 생산물에 대한위험인식과 수용에 미치는 영향", 한국언론학보, 52(1), pp.467~500 (2008), 한국언론학회
- Study on the Enhancement of Public Acceptance in Nuclear Safety: Public opinion poll on safety and regulations of nuclear energy, "Park MI", Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, ~ (2007)
- Pidgeon NF, "Climate change or nuclear power-No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain", GEC, 18, pp.69~85 (2006)
- Slovic P, "How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits", Policy Sci, 9(2), pp.127~152 (1978)
- Slovic P, "Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste", Science, 254, pp.1603~1607 (1991)