본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정상 뇌혈관 영상에서 3D-TOF 기법과 3D-CTA 기법을 이용한 정량, 정성적 비교 평가

Quantitative and Qualitative Comparative Evaluation using 3D-TOF and 3D-CTA Techniques in Normal Cerebrovascular imaging

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study was evaluated as having high diagnostic value among DSA, flow rate-enhanced magneticresonance imaging (3-D-TOF) and computed tomography angiography (3D-CTA), which are mainly used to examinecerebrovascular diseases with the second-highest mortality rate after cancer, and studied which test method is usefulthrough quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis of 3D-CTA and 3D-TOF, which are relatively safe methods. The Image J program was used to analyze the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the contrast noise ratio (CNR) of3D-TOF and 3D-CTA for quantitative comparison and analysis, and the Willcoxon signed rack test program was usedto perform qualitative comparison and analysis. Data from 30 normal patients who performed 3D-TOF and 3D-CTAat University C from April 2022 to August 2022 were collected through the PACS program. The ROI was analyzed bysetting left and right M1, M2, M3, P1, P2, and P3 in 3D-TOF and 3D-CTA images, respectively, and the significanceevaluation of the analysis results was confirmed through the Independence test. As a result of quantitative evaluation,SNR and CNR measured 3D-TOF approximately 30% higher than 3D-CTA, and even in qualitative evaluation,3D-TOF was approximately twice as high as 3D-CTA. Therefore, if the patient can understand the shortcomings ofthe long test time, the 3D-TOF test method has higher diagnostic value. And it is believed that these results can beprovided as clinical basic data.

Abstract

This study was evaluated as having high diagnostic value among DSA, flow rate-enhanced magneticresonance imaging (3-D-TOF) and computed tomography angiography (3D-CTA), which are mainly used to examinecerebrovascular diseases with the second-highest mortality rate after cancer, and studied which test method is usefulthrough quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis of 3D-CTA and 3D-TOF, which are relatively safe methods. The Image J program was used to analyze the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the contrast noise ratio (CNR) of3D-TOF and 3D-CTA for quantitative comparison and analysis, and the Willcoxon signed rack test program was usedto perform qualitative comparison and analysis. Data from 30 normal patients who performed 3D-TOF and 3D-CTAat University C from April 2022 to August 2022 were collected through the PACS program. The ROI was analyzed bysetting left and right M1, M2, M3, P1, P2, and P3 in 3D-TOF and 3D-CTA images, respectively, and the significanceevaluation of the analysis results was confirmed through the Independence test. As a result of quantitative evaluation,SNR and CNR measured 3D-TOF approximately 30% higher than 3D-CTA, and even in qualitative evaluation,3D-TOF was approximately twice as high as 3D-CTA. Therefore, if the patient can understand the shortcomings ofthe long test time, the 3D-TOF test method has higher diagnostic value. And it is believed that these results can beprovided as clinical basic data.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. Kim JR, "A Hospital-based Case-control Study on the Risk Factors of Cerebrovascular Disease", JPMPH, 28(2), pp.473~486 (1995)
  2. Sim JH, "The Relationship between Cerebrovascular Mortality and Community Health Indicators in Gangwon-do", JAMCH, 34(1), pp.1~12 (2009)[DOI]
  3. Seo YH, "Analysis of the Entrance Surface Dose(ESD)and Contrast Usage of Trance Femoral Cerebral Angiography(TFCA)and Cerebral Computed Tomographic Angiography(CCTA)for Cerebrovascular Disease Examining", JKSR, 13(4), pp.495~502 (2019)[DOI]
  4. Byun JS, "A Study on Selection of Optimal Imaging Diagnostic Device for Cerebral Angiography : Focusing on MRA, CTA, and DSA Imaging Diagnosis Devices", JKSR, 11(7), pp.637~645 (2017)[DOI]
  5. Lee DR, "Comparison of conventional 2D, 3D DSA and 4D DSA in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease", Journal of the korean society of intervention and imaging technology(JKSI), 21(1), pp.40~48 (2018)
  6. Cha YC, "Mage Quality and Radiation Doses of 320-MDCT for Whole Brain CT Angiography(CTA) : Comparison with 64-MDCT", JKSCT, 14(2), pp.85~95 (2012)
  7. Goo EH, "Quantitative Assessment using SNR and CNR in Cerebrovascular Diseases : Focusing on FRE-MRA, CTA Imaging MethodEun-Hoe Goo", JKSR, 11(6), pp.1~8 (2017)[DOI]
  8. Chin SA, "Deducting the elements for VR medical simulation based on the Biomechanism of Insulin and Diabetes Diseases", AJMAHS, 8(8), pp.19~26 (2018)
  9. Rundek T, "Cerebrovascular disease", Curr Opin Neurol, 25(1), pp.1~4 (2012)[DOI]
  10. Back SH, "Quantitative Analysis of Fluid Velocity and Signal Loss of the TOF-MRA in a 3. 0T MR System : Using the Flow Rate Control Phantom", JKSR, 14(7), pp.965~973 (2020)[DOI]
  11. Choi YJ, "Evaluation of TOF MR Angiography and Imaging for the Half Scan Factor of Cerebral Artery", JOM, 26(3), pp.92~98 (2016)[DOI]
  12. Han YS, "The Research to Correct Overestimation in TOF-MRA for Severity of Cerebrovascular Stenosis", IEIE, 51(12), pp.180~188 (2014)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

초급성 허혈성 뇌졸중 환자에서 3.0T 유속증강 자기공명 혈관 조영술을 이용한 임상적 유용성 고찰:1.5T 기준참고 프로토콜구은회, 성경정(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2020 · 제14권 제1호내경동맥의 협착 및 폐색의 평가에 있어서의 비침습적인 영상의학적 검사방법들의 비교 연구 : CT혈관조영술(CTA), 유체속도강도 자기공명혈관조영술(TOF-MRA), 조영증강 자기공명혈관조영술(CE-MRA)서상현, 이경열, 이준형, 정태섭대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2011 · 제15권 제3호뇌졸중 환자에서 3 Tesla 자기공명혈관조영술의 유용성윤웅, 강형근, 서정진, 송상국, 신상수, 임효순, 장남규, 정용연, 정태웅, 한제희대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2005 · 제9권 제2호두개내 동맥협착 평가에 있어서 조영증강 자기공명혈관조영과 유체속도강조 자기공명혈관조영의 비교박광열대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2006 · 제8권 제2호An Assessment of the Usefulness of Time of Flight in Magnetic Resonance Angiography Covering the Aortic Arch동경래, 지연상, 최지원, Jae-Kwang Ryu, Sung-Hyun Choi, Yeong-Jun Yoo(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2018 · 제12권 제4호뇌혈관 직경측정을 위한 3차원 회전 혈관조영술의 유용성김상현, 김승기대한방사선과학회 · Journal of Radiological Science and Technology2023 · 제46권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (28건)