Review of Artificial Intelligence Platform Policies and Strategies in South Korea, United States, China and the European Union Using National Innovation Capacity
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
South Korea is at an important juncture in its history to decide whether to continue its investment to become a first-mover of artificial intelligence (A.I.) platform technology or stay as a fast follower. This paper compares South Korea’s A.I. platform capacity to that of the United States, China and the European Union by reviewing publicly opened documents and reports on AI platform strategies and policies using the three elements of the national innovation capacity: common innovation infrastructure, cluster-specific conditions, and quality of linkages. This paper found three major areas the South Korean government can focus on in the A.I. platform industry. First, South Korea needs to increase its investment in the A.I. field and expand its public-private collaboration activities. Second, unlike the U.S. and the U.K., South Korea lacks data protection policies. Third, South Korea needs to build a high-performance system and environment to experiment with artificial intelligence technology and big data.
Abstract
South Korea is at an important juncture in its history to decide whether to continue its investment to become a first-mover of artificial intelligence (A.I.) platform technology or stay as a fast follower. This paper compares South Korea’s A.I. platform capacity to that of the United States, China and the European Union by reviewing publicly opened documents and reports on AI platform strategies and policies using the three elements of the national innovation capacity: common innovation infrastructure, cluster-specific conditions, and quality of linkages. This paper found three major areas the South Korean government can focus on in the A.I. platform industry. First, South Korea needs to increase its investment in the A.I. field and expand its public-private collaboration activities. Second, unlike the U.S. and the U.K., South Korea lacks data protection policies. Third, South Korea needs to build a high-performance system and environment to experiment with artificial intelligence technology and big data.
참고문헌 (55)
- Anderson, J., "Solutions to address AI’s anticipated negative impacts", Pew Research Center, pp.22~ (2018)
- Autor, D., "Work of the Past, Work of the Future", AEA Papers and Proceedings 2019, 10, pp.1~32 (2019)
- Brundage, M., "Smart policies for artificial intelligence", ~ (2016)
- "Online Targeting: Final Report and Recommendations" (2020)[URL]
- "Why we shouldn’t underestimate South Korea in the race to A.I. supremacy" (2020)[URL]
- "Artificial intelligence policy trends and implications in major countries (No. 23)" (2019)[URL]
- 최창수, "공공데이터 개방에 관한 유럽연합, 영국, 미국의 입법례와 국내 법제의 개선방향", 홍익법학, 19(2), pp.473~497 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- Economics of digital platform II: Regulatory issues in the digital market in the age of big data and A.I, "Choi, G. Y.", KISDI, ~ (2020)
- "Global artificial intelligence platform market – industry trends and forecast to 2027 (technical report)" (2020)[URL]
- Dolata, U., "Technological innovations and sectoral change: Transformative capacity, adaptability, patterns of change: An analytical framework", Research Policy, 38(6), pp.1066~1076 (2009)[DOI]
- "Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions" (2021)[URL]
- Furman, J. L., "The determinants of national innovative capacity", Research Policy, 31(6), pp.899~933 (2002)[DOI]
- Godin, B, "National innovation system: The system approach in historical perspective", Science, Technology, & Human Values, 34(4), pp.476~501 (2009)
- "South Korea becomes a global leader in innovation through investment in research, systemic reform, and talent mobility" (2020)[URL]
- "‘Untact’: South Korea’s plan for a contact-free society" (2020)[URL]
- "Japan’s artificial intelligence (A.I.) policy trends and action strategies" (2017)[URL]
- "Talent development policy trends in major overseas countries in response to the 4th industrial revolution" (2018)[URL]
- "A.I. policy trends and implications in major countries" (2019)[URL]
- "Policy Trends and Implications for AI Human Capital in Major Countries" (2020)[URL]
- "European Union General Data Protection Regulation Guidebook" (2020)[URL]
- "Major countries’ response strategies and policy suggestions for activating artificial intelligence" (2018)[URL]
- Kenney, M, "The rise of the platform economy", Issues in science and technology, 32(3) (2016)
- Kenney, M., "Platforms and industrial change", Industry and Innovation, 26(8), pp.871~879 (2019)
- "Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) Policy Trends in Japan" (2019)[URL]
- "Major countries’ response to china’s technological development: Focusing on Huawei’s case (No. 2)" (2020)[URL]
- Kim, K. H., "A study on how to activate the domestic A.I. open science ecosystem" (2018), Korea Information Society Development Institute
- 김민정, "Benefits and Concerns of the Sharing Economy: Economic Analysis and Policy Implications", KDI Journal of Economic Policy, 41(1), pp.15~41 (2019), 한국개발연구원[DOI]
- Kim, S. S., "The innovative platform programme in South Korea: economic policies in innovation-driven growth", Foresight and STI Governance, 13(3), pp.13~22 (2019)[DOI]
- "China strengthens public-private partnerships to vitalize national A.I. open platforms" (2019)[URL]
- "A Study on Management of Publicly-Funded Research Papers on Open Science" (2016)[URL]
- "Establishing a system for sharing and disseminating research data" (2020)[URL]
- "Artificial intelligence platform trends and policy implications" (2017)[URL]
- Lee, J. Y., "Suggestions for Nurturing Ecosystem to Spur Artificial Intelligence Industry", Electronics and Telecommunications Trends, 31(2), pp.51~62 (2016)[DOI]
- "Universities and tech giants back national cloud computing project" (2020)[URL]
- Artificial intelligence (A.I.) R&D strategy to realizei-Korea 4.0, "MinistrIy of Science and CT", Ministry of Science and ICT, ~ (2018)
- Strategic investment for innovative growth-data, "A.I. economy activation plan (’19 ’23)", Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, 2019
- Korean new deal - a national strategy for a great transformation, "Ministry of Economy and Finance", The Government of the Republic of Korea, ~ (2020)
- Public service utilization and prospects of A.I. technology, "Ministry of Science and ICT", Ministry of Science and ICT, ~, pp.Issue analysis no. 119 (2018)
- "Review of fair competition issues related to digital platforms and artificial intelligence algorithms" (2019)[URL]
- Nature Physics Editorial, "Forge ahead", Nature Physics, 11, pp.981~ (2015)[DOI]
- Noh, K. S., "What is a platform?" (2014), CommunicationBooks Inc
- "National innovation systems" (1997)[URL]
- "Measuring the digital transformation: A roadmap for the future" (2019)[URL]
- "More than 540,000 people are employed in the platform economy" (2019)[URL]
- "Platform economy stands at crossroads" (2019)[URL]
- "Concept and deployment strategy for artificial intelligence platforms" (2018)[URL]
- "Current Status of the U.K.‘s Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) Industry" (2019)[URL]
- "National innovative capacity" (2001)[URL]
- Poutanen, S., "Digital Work and the Platform Economy: Understanding Tasks, Skills and Capabilities in the New Era" (2019), Routledge
- "2019 Science Technology & ICT Policy and Technology Trend Analysis" (2019)[URL]
- "Key Areas to Promote National Intelligence in Major Countries" (2019)[URL]
- Underwood, P.A, "First mover" (2012), Golden Lion Books
- Watkins, A., "National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature", Research Policy, 44(8), pp.1407~1418 (2015)
- "What is GDPR, the EU’s new data protection law?" (2021)[URL]
- "Korea to nurture ‘platform economy’" (2018)[URL]
