본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

가정의학 임상실습과정에 대한 구조화된 평가

Structured Assessment to Evaluate a Family Medicine Clerkship Program

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study was conducted to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of a 3-week family medicine clerkship program based on the results of an online survey taken by the students (N=127) and a structured interview with a focus group (n=10), aimed to improve the quality of the clerkship program. The online survey contained questions pertaining to goals, schedule, contents, arrangement, atmosphere, environment, evaluation, and satisfaction regarding the clerkship. The focus group interview addressed the schedule and achievements of the program. Scores were reported on a 5-point Likert scale. Most students were highly satisfied with the overall quality of the clerkship. The structured interview results showed that 97.6% of the clerkship program was executed according to the schedule. The focus group reported a perfect score of 5 points on several measures including: accomplishment of the educational goals of the family medicine clerkship, providing many chances to obtain medical histories and perform physical examinations on real patients, experience with various symptoms and diseases, positive attitudes of faculty members when teaching, notification of the guidelines for evaluation beforehand, well-constructed and effective clerkship schedule, and reflection of student feedback. However, the focus group gave low scores on: support for health accidents of students, access to patient information, enough opportunities to practice clinical skills, appropriate rest facilities for students, and fairness of clerkship evaluation process. In conclusion, the structured evaluation performed after the 3-week clerkship program motivated students and helped them ensure an efficient clerkship. This structured evaluation also suggested basic data to make the professor who is subject of the assessment. This study shows that structured assessment is an effective method which can be used to improve the quality of clerkships.

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of a 3-week family medicine clerkship program based on the results of an online survey taken by the students (N=127) and a structured interview with a focus group (n=10), aimed to improve the quality of the clerkship program. The online survey contained questions pertaining to goals, schedule, contents, arrangement, atmosphere, environment, evaluation, and satisfaction regarding the clerkship. The focus group interview addressed the schedule and achievements of the program. Scores were reported on a 5-point Likert scale. Most students were highly satisfied with the overall quality of the clerkship. The structured interview results showed that 97.6% of the clerkship program was executed according to the schedule. The focus group reported a perfect score of 5 points on several measures including: accomplishment of the educational goals of the family medicine clerkship, providing many chances to obtain medical histories and perform physical examinations on real patients, experience with various symptoms and diseases, positive attitudes of faculty members when teaching, notification of the guidelines for evaluation beforehand, well-constructed and effective clerkship schedule, and reflection of student feedback. However, the focus group gave low scores on: support for health accidents of students, access to patient information, enough opportunities to practice clinical skills, appropriate rest facilities for students, and fairness of clerkship evaluation process. In conclusion, the structured evaluation performed after the 3-week clerkship program motivated students and helped them ensure an efficient clerkship. This structured evaluation also suggested basic data to make the professor who is subject of the assessment. This study shows that structured assessment is an effective method which can be used to improve the quality of clerkships.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 박훈기, "가정의학과 임상실습교육에 의한 의과대학 3학년 학생의 가정의학과 선호도 향상 효과", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 24(5), pp.5~450 (2003), 대한가정의학회
  2. 한재진, "임상실습교육의 도전과 발전", 대한의사협회지, 55(10), pp.926~928 (2012), 대한의사협회[DOI]
  3. 김상현, "한국의 의과대학 및 의학전문대학원에서의 임상실습 교육과정 운영과 관리", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 21(4), pp.373~383 (2009), 한국의학교육학회
  4. 박일환, "Comparison of Medical Students’ Satisfaction with Family Medicine Clerkships between University Hospitals and Community Hospitals or Clinics", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 37(6), pp.340~345 (2016), 대한가정의학회
  5. "The name of family medicine, changed to family doctor" (2013)[URL]
  6. 박세준, "가정의학과 전공의 지원결정 시기와 동기", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 28(12), pp.931~936 (2007), 대한가정의학회
  7. 임은정, "의과대학 및 의학전문대학원 임상실습 수업평가 현황 분석", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 23(2), pp.119~126 (2011), 한국의학교육학회
  8. Lee YM, "Evaluating clinical teaching in medicine", Korean J Med Educ, 14(2), pp.293~300 (2002)
  9. 채수진, "국내 의과대학 강좌평가제 운영 실태 분석", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 19(2), pp.133~142 (2007), 한국의학교육학회
  10. 임은정, "임상실습 수업평가를 위한 평가도구 개발 및 검증", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 23(1), pp.49~59 (2011), 한국의학교육학회
  11. Kitzinger J, "Qualitative research : introducing focus groups", BMJ, 311(7000), pp.299~302 (1995)
  12. Rabiee F, "Focus-group interview and data analysis", Proc Nutr Soc, 63(4), pp.655~660 (2004)
  13. Neher JO, "A five-step"microskills"model of clinical teaching", J Am Board Fam Pract, 5(4), pp.419~424 (1992)
  14. Graffam B, "Using observations of clinicians’teaching practices to build a model of clinical instruction", Acad Med, 83(8), pp.768~774 (2008)
  15. Miller A, "Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors’education and performance: a systematic review", BMJ, 341, pp.c5064~ (2010)
  16. Lurie SJ, "Relationship between clinical assessment and examination scores in determining clerkship grade", Med Educ, 44(2), pp.177~183 (2010)
  17. 이상엽, "의과대학 임상실습에서의 학생평가방법: 과거, 현재 및 제언", 의학교육논단, 15(3), pp.120~124 (2013), 연세대학교 의과대학
  18. 채수진, "수업평가에 대한 교수와 학생 인식 비교-일개 의과대학 사례-", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 20(2), pp.163~167 (2008), 한국의학교육학회
  19. Wang PW, "Using multiple assessments to evaluate medical students’ clinical ability in psychiatric clerkships", Acad Psychiatry, 35(5), pp.307~311 (2011)
  20. Im SJ, "Strategies for effective teaching in clinical clerkship", Hanyang Med Rev, 32(1), pp.51~58 (2012)
  21. Garner MS, "The positive effect of immediate feedback on medical student education during the surgical clerkship", J Surg Educ, 71(3), pp.391~397 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)