본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

교사의 디자인사고 확산 결정요인에 관한 탐색적 연구: 혁신확산이론을 중심으로

An Exploratory Study on Determinants of Teachers’ Design Thinking Based on Diffusion of Innovation

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

디자인사고는 교사의 창조적 교육ㆍ수업혁신을 위한 창의적 사고의 형태로 대두되고 있음에도 불구하고 교사의 디자인사고 확산 구조를 규명하는 학문적 논의는 상대적으로 부족하다. 이에, 본 연구는 Rogers(1995)의 혁신확산이론을 바탕으로 교사의 디자인사고 확산을 결정하는 요인을 탐색적으로 확인하고 이러한 결정요인과 디자인사고 특성 요인간의 관계를 분석하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 서울⋅경기지역에 소재하고 있는 316명의 교사를 대상으로 조사연구를 실시하였으며, 분산 기반의 구조방정식(Variance-Based SEM; VB-SEM)인 Partial Least Squares structural equation modelling method (PLS-SEM)을 사용하여 교사의 디자인사고 선행요인을 검증하였다. 본 연구의 주요 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 교사의 디자인사고 특성 중 협업을 결정하는 요인으로는 적합성, 상대적 이익, 복잡성, 시험가능성으로 나타났다. 둘째, 디자인사고의 공감에는 적합성을 제외한 모든 변인들이 영향을 미쳤으며 복잡성이 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 결정요인으로 나타났다. 셋째, 디자인사고의 낙관주의를 결정하는 요인으로 상대적 이익이 다른 선행요인보다 월등한 영향을 주는 것으로 확인되었다. 이러한 연구결과는 Rogers의 혁신확산이론의 변인들이 교사의 디자인사고를 확산시키는 선행요인으로 적합할 수 있음을 시사하고 있다. 아울러, 혁신확산이론은 교사의 디자인사고 확산 연구에 있어 이론적 기반을 제공할 수 있음을 보여주고 있다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors that determine the spread of teachers’ design thinking (DT) based on Rogers's (1995) Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) and to analyze the relationship between these determinants and features of DT. For this purpose, a survey was conducted on 316 teachers in Seoul and Gyeonggi area, and the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling method (PLS-SEM) was used to verify the determinants of teachers’ DT. The main results of this study are as follows: First, 'compatibility’, ‘relative advantage’, ‘complexity’, and ‘trialability’ of DOI were found to have an effect on ‘collaboration’. Second, all the variables but ‘compatibility’ had an effect on ‘empathy’ of DT, and ‘complexity’ was the most influential determinant. Third, ‘relative advantage’ was found to have a superior effect on the ‘optimism’ of DT than other antecedents. This study‘s findings indicate that variables of DOI are suitable as antecedents to the spread of teachers’ DT. Also, the study provides empirical evidence that the DOI can provide a theoretical foundation for the research related to the spread of teachers’ DT.

참고문헌 (61)

  1. Bennet, S., "Online Collaborative Learning" (2004), Information Science Publishing
  2. Brown, T., "Design thinking", Harvard Business Review, 86(6), pp.84~ (2008)
  3. Chin, W. W., "The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling", Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), pp.295~336 (1998)
  4. Chin, W. W., "Handbook of partial least squares", pp.655~690 (2010), Springer
  5. Wynne W. Chin, "Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing: Some Practical Reminders", Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16(4), pp.287~298 (2014), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  6. 조소영, "Rogers의 혁신의 확산이론에 기반한 초등학교 교사의 e-러닝 확산과 채택", 교육공학연구, 28(2), pp.409~438 (2012), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
  7. 최형신, "디자인 사고와 컴퓨팅 사고를 결합한 새로운 교사 교육 코스 설계", 정보교육학회논문지, 21(3), pp.343~350 (2017), 한국정보교육학회
  8. Cross, N., "Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work" (2011), Berg
  9. "Effects of combining case-based instruction and mindfulness activities on the acquisition, application, and transfer of complex knowledge: An experimental comparison of two multiple-case treatments on videodisc" (1996)[URL]
  10. N. Davis, "Restructuring of educational systems in the digital age from a co-evolutionary perspective", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), pp.438~450 (2013), Wiley[DOI]
  11. Gladwell, M., "Outliers: The story of success" (2008), Little, Brown and Company
  12. Hair Jr, J. F., "A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)" (2016), Sage Publication
  13. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" (2006), Pearson Education
  14. Hall, G. E., "Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes", pp.2006, Pearson
  15. Jörg Henseler, "Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS", Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), pp.182~209 (2014), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  16. Khe Foon Hew, "Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research", Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), pp.223~252 (2007), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  17. Arvid O.I. Hoffmann, "The impact of fraud prevention on bank‐customer relationships", International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(5), pp.390~407 (2012), Emerald[DOI]
  18. Maurice Holt, "Managing curriculum change in a comprehensive school: conflict, compromise and deliberation", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(2), pp.137~148 (1990), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  19. 홍성연, "혁신저항이론에 근거한 대학교수의 e-티칭포트폴리오 이용 활성화 방안 탐색", 교육정보미디어연구, 19(3), pp.493~521 (2013), 한국교육정보미디어학회
  20. IDEO, "Design thinking for educators" (2012), IDEO
  21. Michelle E. Jordan, "Teaching as Designing: Preparing Pre-Service Teachers for Adaptive Teaching", Theory Into Practice, 55(3), pp.197~206 (2016), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  22. 정정호, "소셜미디어 환경에서 디자인 사고 중심의 창조적 가치창출 - 기업의 집단지성 활용방안 중심으로 -", 디자인학연구, 24(3), pp.285~296 (2011), 한국디자인학회
  23. Jung, J. H., "A study on the multi-intelligence and the type of thinking about the creative designer", doctor, pp.2013
  24. Kagan, S. L., "United we stand: Collaboration for child care and early education services" (1991), Teachers College Press
  25. 김회수, "Rogers의 혁신확산이론에 기초한 교사의 e-러닝 정책 수용·확산 검사 개발", 교육정보미디어연구, 24(1), pp.23~52 (2018), 한국교육정보미디어학회[DOI]
  26. 김정희, "서비스 제공자 공감이 사회적 교환과 고객 자발적 성과에 미치는 영향", 유통경영학회지, 16(6), pp.81~93 (2013), 한국유통경영학회[DOI]
  27. 김성아, "초등 혁신학교 교사가 인식하는 혁신특성요인이 정책수용도에 미치는 영향 분석", 초등교육연구, 28(3), pp.45~70 (2015), 한국초등교육학회
  28. Knezek, G., "International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, Section4: IT competencies and attitudes", pp.321~332 (2008), Springer
  29. Konno, N., "Design thinking" (2015), Argo9 Media Group
  30. 이선경, "디자인 사고과정(Design Thinking Process)에 기반한 예비유아교사 창의성 프로그램의 적용효과", 창의력교육연구, 17(2), pp.37~55 (2017), 한국창의력교육학회
  31. Lockwood, T., "Design thinking: Integrating innovation, customer experience and brand value" (2010), Allworth
  32. Paul Benjamin Lowry, "Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for Building and Testing Behavioral Causal Theory: When to Choose It and How to Use It", IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(2), pp.123~146 (2014), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)[DOI]
  33. Fred Luthans, "Emerging Positive Organizational Behavior", Journal of Management, 33(3), pp.321~349 (2007), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  34. Martin, R., "The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage" (2009), Harvard Business Press
  35. Mckim, R., "Experiences in visual thinking", pp.1973, Brooks
  36. Madeleine McNamara, "Starting to Untangle the Web of Cooperation, Coordination, and Collaboration: A Framework for Public Managers", International Journal of Public Administration, 35(6), pp.389~401 (2012), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  37. "An introduction to the 2015 elementaryㆍmiddle school curriculum" (2015)[URL]
  38. 문대영, "초등 예비교사의 발명 문제 해결 활동을 위한디자인 씽킹 적용 방안 탐색", 한국실과교육학회지, 31(2), pp.21~39 (2018), 한국실과교육학회[DOI]
  39. Gary C. Moore, "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation", Information Systems Research, 2(3), pp.192~222 (1991), Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)[DOI]
  40. Mootee, I., "Design thinking for creativity and business innovation series" (2010), Harvard Graduate School of Design
  41. 박기용, "디자인 사고의 본질을 반영한 수업설계모형 개발연구", 교육공학연구, 32(4), pp.837~866 (2016), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
  42. 박기용, "예비교사의 수업설계 전문성 제고를 위한 디자인 사고 개발 방안 탐색", 교육과정연구, 37(2), pp.107~130 (2019), 한국교육과정학회
  43. Park, S. H., "Empathy, empathetic understanding" (1994), Wonmisa
  44. "Framework for 21st century learning" (2015)[URL]
  45. Pink, D. H., "A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future" (2006), Riverhead
  46. Ragan, M., "This is a modified version of the service delivery continuum developed in El Paso County, Colorado", Building Comprehensive Human Service System, 22(3), pp.58~62 (2003)
  47. Rogers, E. M., "Diffusion of innovations" (1995), Free Press
  48. Rogers, E. M., "Diffusion of innovations" (2003), Free Press
  49. 서영호, "디자인 사고를 적용한 SW교육이 초등학교 예비교사의 창의성에 미치는 효과", 정보교육학회논문지, 21(3), pp.351~360 (2017), 한국정보교육학회
  50. 성귀복, "예비영어교사의 문제해결역량 증진을 위한디자인사고 프로세스 활용 프로젝트 연구", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(6), pp.781~806 (2018), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  51. Simon, H. A., "The sciences of the artificial" (1969), MIT Press
  52. Simon, H. A., "The sciences of artificial" (1981), MIT Press
  53. Soland, J., "Measuring 21st-century competencies: Guidance for educators" (2013), Asia Society
  54. Son, Y. M., "Educational innovation in Korea Ⅰ" (2013), Choonmyoung
  55. Michel Tenenhaus, "PLS path modeling", Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), pp.159~205 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  56. Van Boxtel, C., "Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge", Learning and Instruction, 10(4), pp.311~330 (2000)
  57. Jeroen J. G. van Merrienboer, "Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning", Educational Psychologist, 38(1), pp.5~13 (2003), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  58. Viswanath Venkatesh, "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies", Management Science, 46(2), pp.186~204 (2000), Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)[DOI]
  59. Wasko, "Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice", MIS Quarterly, 29(1), pp.1~23 (2005), JSTOR[DOI]
  60. Allan H. K. Yuen, "Exploring teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology", Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), pp.229~243 (2008), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  61. Zhao, Y., "Conditions for classroom technology innovations", Teachers college record, 104(3), pp.482~515 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)