본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유전자원발명의 출처공개에 관한 국제규범 채택 움직임과 대응방안 - WIPO IGC의 ‘의장문안(Chair’s Text)’을 중심으로 -

Policy Consideration for the Negotiations at WIPO Diplomatic Conference on the Introduction of Disclosure Requirement

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

이 글은 2024년 조약 타결을 위한 외교회의를 앞두고, 동 외교회의 협상의 기본문서인 “지식재산, 유전자원 및 유전자원 연관 전통지식과 관련된 국제 법률문서(안)에 대한 의장문안”(이하 ‘의장문안’)에 제시된 유전자원발명의출처공개 의무화 등에 관한 주요 내용과 시사점이 무엇이며, 유전자원의 해외 의존도가 높은 우리나라가 향후 외교회의 시 채택해야 할 구체적인 대응방안을 제안하기 위해 작성되었다. 의장문안은 발명이 실질적/직접적으로 유전자원 등을 기반으로 한 경우특허출원 시 원산국/출처를 공개하여야 하고, 특허청에 출처공개 서류의 진위를 검증할 의무를 부과해서는 안 되며, 출처공개 의무 불이행을 이유로 특허를 무효로 하거나 실시불가능하게 만들 수 없고, 의장문안의 발효 후 4년내에 출처공개 의무를 다른 IP 분야 및 파생물로 확장할 수 있는 가능성 등을 재검토하도록 의무화하고 있다. 이 글은 우리나라 기업의 부담을 줄이고 특허제도에 변화를 최소화하기위해 다음과 같은 외교회의 대응방안을 제언한다. 첫째, 출처공개 의무화(제3조)에 대해서는 공개 의무화에 반대하여야 하고, 둘째, 예외와 제한(제4조), 제재 및 구제조치(제6조)에 대해서는 체약 당사국의 재량을 허용하는 규정을 지지하되, 부정한 의도가 있는 경우와 관련된제6.4조는 의미가 명확치 않고 법적 불확실성을 유발하므로 삭제를 주장하여야 하며, 셋째, 유전자원 정보시스템 구축(제7조)에 대해서는 현 규정을 적극 지지하여야 하고, 넷째, 의장문안의 발효 후, 출처공개 의무의 대상범위확장 재검토(제9조)에 대해서는 반대하여야 한다.

Abstract

This article intends to contribute to the examination of recent developments, challenges and controversies concerning Disclose Requirement, with focus on the provisions of the “Chair’s text on a Draft International Legal Instrument Relating to Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge Associated with Genetic Resources” (“Chair’s text”) which is being discussed at the World Intellectual Property Organization. The article recognizes that the Chair’s text introduces mandatory disclosure of geographical location of Genetic Resources (“GR”) and Traditional Knowledge Associated with Genetic Resources (“Associated TK”). This article subsequently shows how specific provisions of the Chairs’ text, inter alia, mandatory Disclosure Requirement (Art. 3), Sanctions and Remedies (Art. 6) and Review (Art. 9), generate burden for the IP users as well as the IP protection regime in Korea by newly requiring disclosure of geographical location or source of GR/Associated TK. The article concludes that the acting in concert on this issue among the like-mind countries which are main users of GR and Associated TK (eg. Rep. of Korea, U.S.A., Japan, Canada) should be enhanced for the upcoming Diplomatic Conference, with a view to minimizing revision of IP law and preventing unexpected burden for IP Users with regard to the provisions set out in the Chair’s text.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 환경부, "나고야의정서 가이드북", 환경부, ~ (2011)
  2. Anaya, Stephen James, "Indigenous People in International Law" (1996), Oxford University Press
  3. 박문숙, "특허출원시 유전자원 출처공개의무에 대한 소고", The Journal of Law & IP, 11(1), pp.75~113 (2021), 세종지적재산권연구소[DOI]
  4. 엄태민, "유전자원 이용 발명의 출처공개제도 도입 논의와 대응방안 ―WIPO IGC의 “지식재산과 유전자원에 관한 통합문서”를 중심으로", 지식재산연구, 15(4), pp.67~102 (2020), 한국지식재산연구원[DOI]
  5. Pires de Carvalho, Nuno, "From the Shaman’s Hut to the Patent Office : In Search of a TRIPS-Consistent Requirement to Disclose the Origin of Genetic Resources and Prior Informed Consent", WASH. U.J.L. &POL’Y, 17, pp.111~ (2005), Washington University
  6. "History of the Convention"[URL]
  7. "The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing"[URL]
  8. "Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1988 on the Legal Protection of biotechnological inventions"[URL]
  9. "Economic Impact of Disclosure Requirements in Patent Applications for ‘Genetic Resources’-Based Innovation"[URL]
  10. "Italian Code of Industrial Property"[URL]
  11. "Act No. 9 of December 15, 1967 on patents (The Norwegian Patents Act)"[URL]
  12. "Federal Act on Patents for Inventions(Patents Act, PatA)"[URL]
  13. "Disclosure Requirements Table" (2022)[URL]
  14. "Genetic Resources"[URL]
  15. "IGC Mandate 2022/2023" (2021)[URL]
  16. "Industrial Property Code (Legislative Decree No. 30 of February 10, 2005, as amended up to Law No. 10829 of July 29, 2021)" (2021)[URL]
  17. "Regulation (2004:162) Amending the Patents Decree (1967:838)"[URL]
  18. World Intellectual Property Organization, "Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge", WIPO, ~ (2017)
  19. Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, "World Intellectual Property Organization", WIPO, ~, pp.Background Brief, No.10 (2016)
  20. The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, "World Intellectual Property Organization", WIPO, ~, pp.Background Brief, No.2 (2016)
  21. World Intellectual Property Organization, "Chair’s text on a Draft International Legal Instrument Relating to Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge Associated with Genetic Resources", WIPO, IC, pp.43, 5[DOI]
  22. World Intellectual Property Organization, "Consolidated Document Relating To Intellectual Property And Genetic Resources Rev. 2", WIPO, IC, pp.47, 6[DOI]
  23. World Intellectual Property Organization, "Consolidated Document Relating To Intellectual Property And Genetic Resources Rev. 2", WIPO, IC, pp.41, 4[DOI]
  24. World Intellectual Property Organization, "Decisions of the Forty-Third Session of the Committee", WIPO, IC, pp.43, DECISIONS[DOI]
  25. World Intellectual Property Organization, "Decisions of the Forty-Second Session of the Committee", WIPO, IC, pp.42, DECISIONS[DOI]
  26. Joint Recommendation on the Use of Databases for the Defensive Protection of Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge Associated with Genetic Resources, "World Intellectual Property Organization", WIPO, IC, pp.36, 8[DOI]
  27. World Intellectual Property Organization, "The Economic Impact of Patent Delays and Uncertainty: U.S. Concerns about Proposals for New Patent Disclosure Requirements", WIPO, IC, pp.37, 15[DOI]
  28. Draft Report, "World Intellectual Property Organization", ~, pp.WIPO (2019), GRTKF[DOI]
  29. Draft Report, "World Intellectual Property Organization", ~, pp.VIP (2013), 2[DOI]
  30. Report, "World Intellectual Property Organization", ~, pp.WO (2022), GA[DOI]
  31. Report, "World Intellectual Property Organization", ~, pp.WIPO (2020), GRTKF[DOI]
  32. Report, "World Intellectual Property Organization", ~, pp.WIPO (2018), GRTKF[DOI]
  33. Report, "World Intellectual Property Organization", ~, pp.WIPO (2018), GRTKF[DOI]
  34. Report, "World Intellectual Property Organization", ~, pp.WIPO (2016), GRTKF[DOI]
  35. Report, "World Intellectual Property Organization", ~, pp.VIP (2013), 3[DOI]
  36. Report, "World Intellectual Property Organization", ~, pp.VIP (2012), PM[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)