대학교육 만족도 측정요인 도출 및 타당성 검증
Determination and Validation of Factors for Measuring University Education Satisfaction
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 고등교육 기관에서 교육 수요자를 대상으로 대학 교육만족도를 측정하기 위한 구성요소를 찾고, 구성요소의 타당성을 검증하기 위해 진행했다. 측정요인을 추출하기 위해 문헌연구, 델파이 전문가에 의한 3차 조사를 실시했고, 문항 전문가에 의한 측정문항을 개발하였다. 문항의 타당성을 확보하기 위해서 2차에 걸친 예비조사를 실시했다. 1차 예비조사는 충남 소재 대학생 251명을 대상으로 했고, 측정문항 탐색을 위해 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 2차 예비조사는 충남 소재 대학생 338명을 대상으로 했고, 1차 예비조사를 통해 추출된 측정문항의 적합도 확인을 위해 확인적 요인분석을 실시했다. 연구결과 대학 교육만족도 측정요인은 교육과정 영역의 13문항, 교육성과 영역의 10문항, 수업의 질 영역의 11문항, 교육시설 및 환경영역의 9개 문항, 대학의 지원체제 영역의 13문항으로 총 5개 영역의 56개 문항으로 구성되었다. 내용 타당도는 CVR(Contents Validity Ratio)과 I-CVI(Item Level Content Validity Index)로 기준값을 확보했다. 구인타당도는 탐색적 요인분석에서 KMO 수치로 표집 적합성을 확보했고, 요인적재량을 확인했다. 확인적 요인분석은 절대적 적합도지수가 GFI, RMSEA, 증분적 적합도 CFI, NFI, TLI로 진행했다. 준거타당도는 공인 타당도 측정결과 적률 상관계수로 확인하였다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to find out what components measure the educational satisfaction of students at university and to confirm their validity. A literature research was done, Delphi surveys by experts were conducted three times and, subsequently, measurement items by item development experts were created to explore measurement factors. To make sure of the validity of the questions, two preliminary surveys were conducted. The first preliminary survey was conducted with 251 university students in Chungnam Province, and exploratory factor analysis was performed to measurement items. The second preliminary survey was carried out with 338 university students in Chungnam Province, and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to verify the suitability of the measurement items extracted from the first preliminary survey. As a result of the study, 13 items relating to Curriculum Area, 10 items to Educational Outcomes, 11 items to Quality of Teaching, 9 items to Educational Facilities and The Environment, and 13 items to The Support System Area of The University were selected. The questionnaire consisted of 56 questions in 5 areas. To establish content validity, CVR(Contents Validity Ratio) and I-CVI(Item Level Content Validity Index) tests were carried out, which confirmed the reference value. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO) test was used to establish construct validity. For the exploratory factor analysis, factor loadings were checked, and for the confirmatory analysis the absolute goodness of fit indices considered were GFI, RMSEA, Incremental Goodness of Fit, CFI, NFI, and TLI. As for criterion validity, the correlation-coefficient was measured.
참고문헌 (53)
- Abdullah, F., "The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector", International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), pp.463~484 (2006)
- Standard for educational and psychological testing, "AERA", American Psychological Association, ~ (1966)
- Aldridge, S., "Measuring customer satisfaction in higher education", Quality Assurance in Education, 6(4), pp.197~204 (2010)
- Autry, C., "A logistics strategy taxonomy", Journal of Business Logistics, 29(2), pp.27~51 (2008)
- Beck, C., "Is the CVI and acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations", Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), pp.459~467 (2007)[DOI]
- Bolton, R. N., "A dynamic model of the duration of the customer‟s relationship with a continuous service provider the role of satisfaction", Marketing Science, 17(1), pp.45~47 (1998)
- Calvo-Porral, C., "Perceived quality in higher education: An empirical study", Journal of Marketing Intelligence & Planing, 31(6), pp.601~619 (2013)[DOI]
- Choi, Y. G., "Influence of university education service quality on educational satisfaction", Journal of Global Business, 11(3), pp.261~278 (2014)
- Choi, Y. J., "A study on the satisfaction variables and influences of university students", Journal of Adult Education in Korea, 16(30), pp.61~83 (2013)
- Dean, A. A., "Improving the educational experience of HLST students in higher education" (2011), The Higher Education Academy
- Elliott, K. M., "Key determinants of student satisfaction", Journal of College Student Retention, 4(3), pp.271~279 (2002)
- Fernandes, C., "Understanding student satisfaction and loyalty in the UAE HE sector", International Journal of Education Management, 27(6), pp.613~630 (2013)
- Field, A., "Discovering statistics using SPSS" (2009), Sage Publications
- Gruber, T., "Examining student satisfaction with higher education service: Using a new measurement tool", International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(2), pp.105~123 (2010)
- Hameed, A., "Students’satisfaction in higher learning institutions: a case study of COMSATS Abbottabad, Parkistan", Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 4(1), pp.63~71 (2011)[DOI]
- Harvey, L., "Student satisfaction approach", Journal New Review of Academic Librarianship, 11(1), pp.161~173 (2002)
- Henning-Thurau, T., "Modeling and managing student loyalty: An approaching based on the concept of relationship quality", Journal of Service Research, 3(4), pp.331~344 (2001)
- Widening the educational capacities of socio-economically disadvantaged students through a model of social and cultural capital development, "Higher Education Institution", British Education Research Journal, ~ (2005)
- Hong, S. H., "The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), pp.161~177 (2000)
- 홍성헌, "교육서비스수출 촉진을 위한 한국 대학교육 평가요인에 관한 연구: 중국인 유학생 관점에서", 통상정보연구, 13(4), pp.461~482 (2011), 한국통상정보학회[DOI]
- Hu, L., "Fit indices in covariance structure modeling： sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification", Research of Psychology Method, 23(4), pp.424~453 (1998)
- 정복주, "대학교육수요자만족도지수(UCSI) 개발 및 적용", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 18(11), pp.406~415 (2018), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- Juga, J., "Service quality and its relation to satisfaction and loyalty in logistics outsourcing relationships", Managing Service Quality, 20(6), pp.496~510 (2010)
- Kim, G. S., "Analysis of structural equation model" (2009), Hakgisa
- Education satisfaction on university, "Korea Educational Development Institute", KEDI, ~ (2007)
- Corporate satisfaction level of college education and training for college graduates, "Korea Vocational Competency Development Institute", KVCDI, ~ (2005)
- 이경화, "교과별 차별화된 플립드 러닝 수업이 대학생의 학업성취 향상 및 수업만족도에 미치는 효과", Global Creative Leader: Education & Learning, 7(1), pp.1~22 (2017), 영재교육연구소[DOI]
- Lee, S. J., "Development of life skills measurement tools- focused on communication skills, problem solving skills, and self-directed learning skills" (2003), Korea Educational Development Institute
- 이상준, "교육서비스의 만족도지수 모형개발 및 IPA를 통한 개선방안", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 13(11), pp.510~521 (2013), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- Lee, S. M., "Analysis of factors 1- focused on exploratory factor analysis" (1995), Hakgisa
- 이영실, "온라인 자기주도학습 수업이 대학생의 자기주도학습력 향상에 미치는 효과", Global Creative Leader: Education & Learning, 8(3), pp.51~70 (2018), 영재교육연구소[DOI]
- 임성범, "대학교육 만족도 측정지표 개발에 관한 연구 -신뢰성과 타당성 검증을 중심으로-", 교육행정학연구, 32(1), pp.187~219 (2014), 한국교육행정학회
- Machleit, K. A., "Emotional response and shopping satisfaction:moderating effects of shopper attributions", Journal of Business Research, 54(2), pp.97~106 (2000)
- McDougall, G. H. G., "Customer satisfaction with services: putting perceived value into the equation", Journal of Service Marketing, 14(5), pp.392~410 (2000)
- Monem, M., "Higher education in Bangladesh: Status, Issues and Prospects", Pakistan Journal of Social Science, 30(2), pp.293~305 (2010)
- Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric Theory" (1994), McGraw-Hill
- Oldfield, B. M., "Student perceptions of service quality in a UK University business and management faculty", Quality Assurance in Education, 8(2), pp.85~95 (2000)
- Park, H. L., "Development of educational satisfaction survey tool reflecting university characteristics", Journal of Convergence of Arts and Humanities, 5(6), pp.375~386 (2015)
- 박인심, "협력학교 기반 교육봉사활동의 성과 분석: S여대 사례를 중심으로", 한국교원교육연구, 31(2), pp.1~27 (2014), 한국교원교육학회[DOI]
- 박제일, "대학만족도 검사의 개발연구", 재활심리연구, 23(4), pp.843~855 (2016), 한국재활심리학회
- Polit, D. F., "The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations", Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), pp.489~497 (2006)
- Reichheld, F. F., "The loyalty effect" (1996), Harvard Business School Press
- Rodie, A. R., "Handbook of service marketing and management", pp.111~126 (2000), Sage Publications
- Samad, S., "The impact of social networking sites on students’ social wellbeing and academic performance", Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), pp.2081~2094 (2009)
- 성은모, "청소년의 행복에 영향을 미치는 개인특성과 환경특성 간의 관계 분석", 한국청소년연구, 24(4), pp.177~202 (2013), 한국청소년정책연구원
- Seong, T. J., "Understanding and applying item response theory" (2001), Hakgisa
- Seong, T. J., "Statistical analysis using SPSS" (2013), Hakgisa
- Seymour, D. T., "On Q: causing quality in higher education, phoenix", pp.42~ (1993), Orxy Press
- 신소영, "대학 교육만족도 측정도구 개발 및 타당화 연구", 교육과학연구, 44(3), pp.107~132 (2013), 교육과학연구소
- Shin, S. Y., "Investigating the importance of university education-satisfaction analysis and ways to improve education satisfaction", Educational Science Research, 44(3), pp.107~132 (2012)
- 손경옥, "전문대학생의 학교만족도 측정도구 개발", 농업교육과 인적자원개발, 46(2), pp.71~98 (2014), 한국농·산업교육학회[DOI]
- Woodall, T., "Making sense of higher education: students as consumers and the value of the university experience", Journal of Students in Higher Education, 39(1), pp.48~67 (2012)[DOI]
- Zeithaml, V. A., "Consumer perception of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence", Journal of marketing, 52(3), pp.2~22 (1988)