본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미세먼지를 둘러싼 핵심 공중 간 위험 인식 차이 및 갈등 요인 분석 - 충남지역 핵심 공중을 대상으로 한 인간심리모델의 적용 -

Analyzing Perceptual Differences among Key Publics about Risk Perceptions toward Particulate Matter and Conflict Factors - The Application of the Mental Models to Key Publics in the Chungnam Region -

김혜정|한지원|이현승|이성주|김영욱
(사)위기관리이론과실천 (Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis)|2022.01|Crisisonomy|제18권 제1호|pp. 1-35|DOI https://doi.org/10.14251/crisisonomy.2022.18.1.1

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

risk communication미세먼지위험 커뮤니케이션particulate mattermental modelsenvironmental conflicts환경 갈등인간심리모델

초록

이 연구는 인간심리모델을 연구 틀로 활용하여 전문가, 지역주민, 사업장으로 대표되는 핵심 공중들간에 충남지역 미세먼지 상황, 발생 원인, 건강 영향, 해결방안에 대한 인식이 어떻게 나타나는지탐색한 후, 핵심 공중들의 위험 인식 도표를 작성하여 가시화되거나 잠재된 갈등 요인을 파악하였다. 연구 결과, 전문가, 지역주민, 사업장은 모두 화력발전소를 비롯한 제철소, 석유화학단지 등 산업영역이 충남지역 미세먼지 배출의 한 축이라는 점을 인정하고 있었다. 다만, 그 기여도를 두고는 입장차가 분명히 나타났는데, 전문가들이 사업장을 충남지역 미세먼지 발생의 주요 원인으로 파악한반면, 사업장은 기여도를 인정하면서도 중국발 미세먼지가 미치는 영향을 더 비중 있게 보고 있었다. 지역주민들은 미세먼지 발생 원인을 복합적으로 인식하면서도 미세먼지를 줄이기 위해 현실적으로할 수 있는 노력은 사업장을 중심으로 전개되어야 한다고 믿고 있었다. 핵심 공중 간의 이러한 인식차이는 미세먼지 해결방안에 대한 입장 차이로 연결되며 갈등의 쟁점이 되고 있었다. 이러한 결과를토대로 미세먼지 문제와 갈등을 해소하기 위한 위험 커뮤니케이션을 제안하였다.

Abstract

This study adopted the Mental Models as a research framework to explore the perceptions toward particulate matter (PM) in Chungnam among the key publics represented by experts, local residents, and employees who work at PM-producing organizations. Interview results showed that experts, local residents, and workers all acknowledged that industrial districts are one of the major contributors to PM emissions in Chungnam. However, there were clear perceptual differences on the level of contributions. Experts identified the industrial districts as the main cause of PM emissions in Chungnam. On the other hand, company employees acknowledged a certain amount of contribution from the industrial districts, but the transboundary PM pollution from China was considered the most significant contribution to the concentration of PM in Chungnam. Local residents recognized the causes of PM in a complex way. However, they believed that realistic efforts to reduce the level of PM should be conducted centering on the industrial districts. These differences in perceptions among the key publics are linked to the conflicting issues related to the way of formulating industry regulations as a solution to the PM problem in Chungnam.

참고문헌 (77)

  1. "Yearbook of Atmospheric Environment" (2018)[URL]
  2. Bacow, Lawrence S, "Environmental Dispute Resolution" (2013), Springer Science & Business Media
  3. Baird, Brian N. R, "Tolerance for Environmental Health Risks:The Influence of Knowledge, Benefits, Voluntariness, and Environmental Attitudes", Risk Analysis, 6(4), pp.425~435 (1986)
  4. Beardsley, K. C., "Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(1), pp.58~86 (2006)
  5. Bennett, Peter, "Risk Communication and Public Health", pp.3~19 (1999), Oxford Univ. Press
  6. Bodemer, Nicolai, "The Sage Handbook of Risk Communication", pp.10~23 (2015), Sage Publications
  7. Bostrom, A., "What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models", Risk Analysis, 14(6), pp.959~970 (1994)
  8. Bostrom, Ann, "Characterizing Mental Models of Hazardous Processes: A Methodology and An Application to Radon", Journal of Social Issues, 4, pp.85~100 (1992)
  9. A Study on Critical Factors of Successful Collaborative Governance for Resolving Environmental Problems, "Chae, Jong Heon", Korea Institute of Public Administration, ~ (2012)
  10. Cho, Myung Rae, "auses and Structure of Environmental Conflicts Concerning National Development Projects", ECO, 14(2), pp.109~136 (2003)
  11. "Seosan Hanwha Total Leaked Oil Vapor Twice. More than 260 Patients are Being Treated" (2019)[URL]
  12. "yundai Steel Calls for Easing the Suspension of Operations" (2019)[URL]
  13. "Chungnam, the No. 1 in Air Pollutant Emission and Political Circles Turning Away from Chungnam" (2018)[URL]
  14. "Chungnam Declared, Respect but Regrettable for the Decision of the Political Disposition Committee on Hyundai Steel Management" (2020)[URL]
  15. Conti, Joseph, "Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent U.S. Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions", Risk Analysis, 31(11), pp.1734~1748 (2011)
  16. Cox, Robert, "Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere" (2010), SAGE Publications
  17. Diehl, Paul, "Environmental Conflict: An anthology" (2018), Routledge
  18. Fischhoff, Baruch, "How Safe Is Safe Enough?: A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits", Policy Sciences, 8, pp.127~152 (1978)
  19. Grunig, James E., "Public Relations Research:An International Perspective", pp.3~46 (1997), International Thompson Business Press
  20. Grunig, James E., "Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management" (2013), Routledge
  21. Grunig, Larissa A., "Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations: A Study of Communication Management in Three Countries" (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  22. 한빛나라, "한국인의 기후변화에 대한 위험 인식 지형 도출: 심층 인터뷰를 통한 전문가와 일반인의 위험 인식 비교", 한국언론정보학보, (101), pp.465~505 (2020), 한국언론정보학회[DOI]
  23. "Dangjin City Declares Energy Conversion Led by Citizens" (2020)[URL]
  24. "The Central Administrative Commission Appeals Chungnam’s Decision to Suspend Operation for Hyungdai Steel is Unfair" (2020)[URL]
  25. "Hanwha Total" (2021)[URL]
  26. Hartmann, Christina, "A Risk Perception Gap? Comparing Expert, Producer and Consumer Prioritization of Food Hazard Controls", Toxicology, 116(part B), pp.100~107 (2018)
  27. Hertwig, Ralph, "The SAGE Hand-book of Risk Communication", pp.24~40 (2015), Sage
  28. Hon, Linda Childers, "Guidelines for Measuring Relationships in Public Relations" (1999), The Institute for Public Relations
  29. "Environmental Governance and Conflict Management for the Water Resource Development Policy and Projects" (2006)[URL]
  30. Jung, Jun Geum, "Development, Preservation, and Conflict Resolution : Focusing on Saemangeum Reclamation Projects", Korean Journal of Public Administration, 9(4), pp.79~103 (2000)
  31. 정정화, "환경갈등과 언론: 부안 방폐장에 대한 이해집단과 미디어 프레임 비교분석", 한국정책학회보, 16(3), pp.177~208 (2007), 한국정책학회
  32. Kasperson, Roger E, "Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks", Journal of Social Issues, 48, pp.161~187 (1992)
  33. "Solar Power Plant Built Instead of a 10-Year Conflict Coal Power Plant" (2020)[URL]
  34. "Employment Insecurity after the Closure of Boryeong Thermal Power Unit 1 and 2" (2021)[URL]
  35. A Study on the Types and Resolution of Conflicts in the Environmental Field, "Kim, Jong Ho", Korea Environment Institute, ~ (2004)
  36. Kim, Yong Pyo, "Trend of Air Quality in Seoul: Policy and Science", Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 18(9), pp.2141~2156 (2018)
  37. 김영욱, "미디어 레퍼토리, 위험특성과 위험커뮤니케이션 인식이 원자력 수용에 미치는 영향- 신뢰의 조절 효과를 중심으로 -", Crisisonomy, 10(4), pp.1~25 (2014), (사)위기관리이론과실천
  38. 김영욱, "미세먼지 위험에 대한 전문가와 일반인의 인식차이와 커뮤니케이션 단서 탐색: 인간심리모델(Mental Models)을 중심으로 한 분석", 커뮤니케이션 이론, 12(1), pp.53~117 (2016), 한국언론학회
  39. Kim, Yung Wook, "Public Relations Communications-Integrating Systems, Rhetorical, and Critical Theories" (2003), Ewha Womans University Press
  40. Kim, Yung Wook, "Risk, Crisis, and Communication" (2008), Ewha Womans University Press
  41. Kim, Yung Wook, "Risk Communication-Blocked Society" (2021), Ewha Womans University Press
  42. Kunreuther, Howard, "Public Attitudes toward Siting a High-Level Nuclear Waste Respository in Nevada", Risk Analysis, 10(4), pp.469~484 (1990)
  43. Lee, Jong Yeol, "Conflict Analysis between Local Governments and Its Management Strategies in Regional Development : A Case Study of Taegu City’s Wichon Industrial Site", Korea Association for Policy Studies, 7(3), pp.159~188 (1998)
  44. Lee, Sang Heon, "From the Domination of Nature to the Social Composition of Nature" (2002), Doyosae
  45. 이수장, "환경갈등해결의 이론적 틀과 제도화 방안", 환경정책, 14(1), pp.75~98 (2006), 한국환경정책학회
  46. 임재형, "한국사회 환경갈등의 발생원인과 특징에 관한 연구", 분쟁해결연구, 14(2), pp.109~136 (2016), 분쟁해결연구센터[DOI]
  47. Lima, Maria L., "Towards Successful Social Impact Assessment Follow-up : A Case Study of Psychosocial Monitoring of a Solid Waste Incinerator in the North of Portugal", Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23(3), pp.227~233 (2005)
  48. Lowe, Thomas D., "Danger Is All Around : Eliciting Expert Perceptions for Managing Climate Change through a Mental Models Approach", Global Environmental Change, 17(1), pp.131~146 (2007)
  49. Lupton, Deborah, "Risk" (2013), Routledge
  50. "POSCO and Hyundai Steel Explaining How They Discharge Pollutants to Tackle with Suspending Operations" (2019)[URL]
  51. "The Korea Steel association said, to Open the Valve Is an Essential Procedure for Safety Secure" (2019)[URL]
  52. Morgan, M. Granger, "Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  53. "Current Status of PM and Policy Suggestions in South Korea and Chungnam. ChungNam Report. 231" (2016)[URL]
  54. Nathan, Kathy, "Tolerance for Potential Environmental Health Risks : The Influence of Knowledge, Benefits, Control, Involvement, and Uncertainty", Journal of Public Relations Research, 4(4), pp.235~258 (1992)
  55. "Local Residents Concerns, Petrochemical Complexes, Thermal Power Plants, and Steel Complexes are All Near My Home" (2016)[URL]
  56. "A U-turn to the Coal-fired Power Generation Era?" (2019)[URL]
  57. Otway, Harry, "Risk Communication:Paradigm and Paradox", Risk Analysis, 9, pp.141~145 (1989)
  58. Perko, Tanja, "Radiation Risk Perception : A Discrepancy Between the Experts and the General Population", Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 133, pp.86~91 (2014)
  59. Perrow, Charles, "Normal Accidents" (1999), Basic Books
  60. Plough, Alonzo, "The Emergence of Risk Communication Studies: Social and Political Context", Science, Technology, & Human Values, 12(3, pp.4) (1987), 4~10
  61. Read, Daniel, "What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? 2. Surveys Studies of Educated Lay People", Risk Analysis, 14(6), pp.971~982 (1994)
  62. Rogers, M. Brooke, "Mediating the Social and Psychological Impacts of Terrorist Attacks: The Role of Risk Perception and Risk Communication", International Review of Psychiatry, 19(3), pp.279~288 (2007)
  63. Sharlatidou, A., "What Do Lay People Want to Know About the Disposal of Nuclear Waste? A Mental Model Approach to the Design and Development of an Online Risk Communication", Risk Analysis, 32(9), pp.1496~1511 (2012)
  64. Shin, Dong Won, "A Survey on the Public Opinion on PM Issues", KEI Focus, 7(2) (2019)
  65. Slovic, Paul, "Social Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough?", pp.181~216 (1980), Plenum
  66. Slovic, Paul, "Public Reactions to Nuclear Power: Are There Critical Masses?", pp.1984, American Association for the Advancement of Science
  67. Slovic, Paul, "Perception of Risk", Science, 230, pp.280~285 (1987)
  68. Slovic, Paul, "Social Theories of Risk", pp.117~152 (1992), Praeger
  69. Slovic, Paul, "The Perception of Risk" (2000), Earthscan publications
  70. Slovic, Paul, "The Perception Gap : Radiation and Risk", Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68(3), pp.67~75 (2012)
  71. Song, Hae Ryong, "Risk Society and Risk Perception" (2014), Sungkyunkwan University Press
  72. Starr, Chauncey, "Social Benefit versus Technological Risk", Science, 165, pp.1232~1238 (1969)
  73. "Chungnam Is the No. 1 in Air Pollutant Emissions for the Six Consecutive Year" (2021)[URL]
  74. Yeo, Ki Bong., "Coal Phase-Out Movement and Its Meaning on Construction of Dangjin Eco-Power Plant", Master, pp.2018
  75. "LNG Conversion Approved for SK Gas and Dangjin Eco Power" (2018)[URL]
  76. "Emergency Reduction Measures for PM in Chungnam... Shutdown of 6 Coal Power Generation" (2021)[URL]
  77. 윤영채, "입지갈등 해결전략으로써의 환경기초시설 빅딜 사례연구", 지방정부연구, 8(4), pp.51~71 (2005), 한국지방정부학회

관련 논문AI추천

미세먼지 위험을 둘러싼 공중 군집 분석: 공중 세분화에 따른 위험 인식 및 관련 행동에 대한 차이점 도출김영욱, 이현승, 이혜진, 장유진한국PR학회 · PR연구2016 · 제20권 제3호미세먼지 저감 행동 연구: 문제해결 상황이론을 응용하여최준혁, 최홍림한국광고PR실학회 · 광고PR실학연구2022 · 제15권 제2호중국인의 미세먼지 대응 행동에 영향을 미치는 요인 RPA 모델의 적용과 확장양명, 조수영한국PR학회 · PR연구2020 · 제24권 제6호미세먼지 위험 메시지의 구성 방식이 메시지 수용, 위험 인식, 대처행동 의도에 미치는 영향 : 핵심정보 중심의 직관적 메시지와 인지양식의 효과강윤지, 심민선한국지역언론학회 · 언론과학연구2019 · 제19권 제4호우리나라 대학생의 미세먼지 관련 지각이 건강행동에 미치는 영향에 대한 탐색: 귀인양식, 관여도, 건강상태지각 및 예방행동의도를 중심으로주지혁한국융합학회 · 한국융합학회논문지2018 · 제9권 제7호환경오염 위험의 원인 및 해결방안에 관한 이해관계자 간 상호 이해와 오해: 상호지향성모델을 중심으로손영곤, 이수범한국PR학회 · PR연구2024 · 제28권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

석유화학단지 내 화학물질 누출사고 발생 시 주민 대피 지원방안 - 충청남도 서산시를 중심으로 -조성, 고승희pp. 37-50재난관리자원 운용 효율화를 위한 방재거점 도입 방향 - 일본 방재거점 운용계획을 중심으로 -이주호pp. 51-68COVID-19 상황 인식이 백신 접종 의향에 미치는 영향 - MZ세대가 갖는 정부신뢰의 조절효과를 중심으로 -노환호, 고명철, 이태준pp. 69-86산불 진화장비의 표준화를 위한 성능평가 기준 개발권춘근, 김성용, 이선주, 류주열pp. 87-98서울시 다중이용업소 관계인 및 이용자의 안전의식 제고 방안고대유, 원종석, 김상균pp. 99-113
원문 보기