「제비뽑기」와 「오멜라스를 떠나는 사람들」에 나타난 목적 없는 폭력의 상징적 의도
The Symbolism of the Pointless Violence in "The Lottery" and "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas"
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
“The Lottery” and “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” by Shirley Jackson and Ursula K. Le Guin are focused on human beings inborn cruelty hidden within the trap of civilization making ritual murder normal and necessary for keeping tradition and community alive. These two authors respectively, American gothic and fantasy female writers, have indicted the unjustice of convention and criticized patriarchal society in relation to social issues. Jackson narrates the society in a peaceful voice to induce a sense of calm in the reader which is abruptly shattered in the ending part. Also she uses a lot of symbolic techniques to dramatize the danger of mob psychology. In the name of tradition, a ritual of victimization is held every year. However, the allegory in this story doesn't suggest what the moral is but forces the reader to choose. Likewise, Le Guin endows both the narrator and reader with the authorship to grant them responsibility for the story. The narrator by creating the Omelas wants to embody an ideal utopia in the real world. By doing this, the narrator induces the readers into creating their own perfect city but they end up framing themselves in the story because they invest in a 'term' which reflects their a priori ideal for a perfect city. A victim , symbolized by a child makes it possible for all of the people in Omelas to enjoy happiness. This functions as dilemma for people who are concerned about pointless violence. That's why there are those who walk away from Omelas, which is rarely thought about by ordinary people living in Omelas. To sum up, these two short stories are pointing out that how cruel the collective consciousness can be and showing how utilitarianism-the greatest good for the greatest numbers of people, is poison for the helpless.
Abstract
“The Lottery” and “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” by Shirley Jackson and Ursula K. Le Guin are focused on human beings inborn cruelty hidden within the trap of civilization making ritual murder normal and necessary for keeping tradition and community alive. These two authors respectively, American gothic and fantasy female writers, have indicted the unjustice of convention and criticized patriarchal society in relation to social issues. Jackson narrates the society in a peaceful voice to induce a sense of calm in the reader which is abruptly shattered in the ending part. Also she uses a lot of symbolic techniques to dramatize the danger of mob psychology. In the name of tradition, a ritual of victimization is held every year. However, the allegory in this story doesn't suggest what the moral is but forces the reader to choose. Likewise, Le Guin endows both the narrator and reader with the authorship to grant them responsibility for the story. The narrator by creating the Omelas wants to embody an ideal utopia in the real world. By doing this, the narrator induces the readers into creating their own perfect city but they end up framing themselves in the story because they invest in a 'term' which reflects their a priori ideal for a perfect city. A victim , symbolized by a child makes it possible for all of the people in Omelas to enjoy happiness. This functions as dilemma for people who are concerned about pointless violence. That's why there are those who walk away from Omelas, which is rarely thought about by ordinary people living in Omelas. To sum up, these two short stories are pointing out that how cruel the collective consciousness can be and showing how utilitarianism-the greatest good for the greatest numbers of people, is poison for the helpless.
참고문헌 (20)
- 르 귄, "글쓰기의 항해술" (2010), 황금가지
- 베르톨트 브레히트, "브레히트는 이렇게 말했다" (2013), 책 읽는 오두막
- Bloom, Herald, "Bloom's major short story writers. Broomall" (2001), Chelsea House Publishers
- Brandt, Bruce E, "Two additional antecedents for Ursula LeGuin", pp.51~57 (2003), ANQ
- Cleveland, Carol, "And Then There Were Nine ... More Women of Mystery", pp.199~219 (1985), Bowling Green State University Popular Press
- Collins, Jerre, "Leaving Omelas: Questions of Faith and Understanding", Studies in Short Fiction, 27, pp.525~535 (1990)
- Fiedler, Leslie, "Olaf Stapledon: A Man Divided" (1983), Oxford UP
- Griffin, Amy A, "Jackson's THE LOTTERY", The Explicator, 58(1), pp.44~46 (1999)
- Jackson, Shirley, "Fourth Compact Edition", pp.212~218 (2005), Pearson Longman
- Jung, Carl G, "Read, Michael Fordham, and Gerhard Adler" (1968), Princeton UP
- Knapp, "The Morality of Creation: Dostoevsky and William James in LeGuin's 'Omelas'", The Journal of Narrative Technique, 15(1), pp.75~81 (1985)
- Le Guin, "Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Fourth Compact Edition", pp.221~226 (2005), Pearson Longman
- Le Guin, "The Language of the Night: Essays on Fantasy and Science Fiction", pp.54~67 (1989), HarperCollilns
- Nebeker, Helen E, "'The Lottery': Symbolic Tour de Force", American Literature, 46(1), pp.100~107 (1974)
- Oehlschlaeger, Fritz., "The Stoning of Mistress Hutchson: Meaning and Context in 'The Lottery", Essays in Literature, 15(2), pp.259~265 (1988)
- Rochelle, Warren G., "Choosing to Be Human: American Romantic", Pragmatic Rhetoric in Ursula K. LeGuin's Teaching Novel, Gifts, 2007, pp.48(1), 84~95
- Shields, Patrick J, "Arbitrary Condemnation and Sanctioned Violence in Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery", Contemporary Justice Review, 7, pp.411~419 (2004)
- Simon, Linda, "William James's Lost souls in Ursula LeGuin's Utopia", Philosophy and Literature, 28, pp.89~103 (2004)
- Sobeloff, Judy, "An overview of 'The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas'", Short Stories for Students, pp.25~30 (2002)
- Whittier, Gayle, "The Lottery" as Misogynist Parable", The English Department, SUNY Binghamton, pp.353~366 (1991)