국내 기업명에 나타난 어형성의 방식 고찰
A Study on the Word-formations of Korean Company Names
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
From a linguistic perspective, this study investigates and studies on Korean company names concerning their meanings and word-formations, based on their structural and semantical aspect. Nowadays, dozens of Korean company names are changed and enrolled on the Korea stock market like COSDAQ, or Securities in a year, according to KTR materials on its own web(June 1, 2014), which makes it difficult to understand the meanings and word-formations of the company names. That is why those of the 129 companies among 1288 ones are chosen on a random tenth basis and studied. This study explains they are composed of a compounding style(27.8%), a derivation one(0.8%), a blending one(18.3%), a shortening one(7.1%), an initialism one(42.1%) including an initialism(alphabetism) + English style and an initialism (alphabetism) + Korean type, and an acronym one(12.4%) in a structural aspect. A Korean’s + English’s shortening(abbreviation; clipping) style is not found. In addition, a little bit of difference between company names’ and borrowings’ word formation is exposed in a blending aspect. Though English borrowings usually consist of a blending type of AB＋CD→AD, AB＋CD→ABD, AB＋CD→ACD, and AB＋CD→BD, there are an AC type such as Enertork, Optisys, Unichem, GemVax, and Chasys (but, classyfied into acronym here) and an AB＋ CD→ABC type like Neuros (Neural + System’→ neuros), Raygen(Ray + generater → Raygen), and 다원Sys(다원 + system). In the semantic aspect of these blending and compounding, a semantic head is usually in the left or both the right and the left as in the case of endocentric compounds, not in exocentric compounds. Thus, this study is expected to provide future studies with a helpful material through correct understanding of English usage and recommend Korean corporations to make their names so that customers can easily figure out what type of their business they are and how to pronounce them.
Abstract
From a linguistic perspective, this study investigates and studies on Korean company names concerning their meanings and word-formations, based on their structural and semantical aspect. Nowadays, dozens of Korean company names are changed and enrolled on the Korea stock market like COSDAQ, or Securities in a year, according to KTR materials on its own web(June 1, 2014), which makes it difficult to understand the meanings and word-formations of the company names. That is why those of the 129 companies among 1288 ones are chosen on a random tenth basis and studied. This study explains they are composed of a compounding style(27.8%), a derivation one(0.8%), a blending one(18.3%), a shortening one(7.1%), an initialism one(42.1%) including an initialism(alphabetism) + English style and an initialism (alphabetism) + Korean type, and an acronym one(12.4%) in a structural aspect. A Korean’s + English’s shortening(abbreviation; clipping) style is not found. In addition, a little bit of difference between company names’ and borrowings’ word formation is exposed in a blending aspect. Though English borrowings usually consist of a blending type of AB＋CD→AD, AB＋CD→ABD, AB＋CD→ACD, and AB＋CD→BD, there are an AC type such as Enertork, Optisys, Unichem, GemVax, and Chasys (but, classyfied into acronym here) and an AB＋ CD→ABC type like Neuros (Neural + System’→ neuros), Raygen(Ray + generater → Raygen), and 다원Sys(다원 + system). In the semantic aspect of these blending and compounding, a semantic head is usually in the left or both the right and the left as in the case of endocentric compounds, not in exocentric compounds. Thus, this study is expected to provide future studies with a helpful material through correct understanding of English usage and recommend Korean corporations to make their names so that customers can easily figure out what type of their business they are and how to pronounce them.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김동환, "개념적 혼성에 입각한 은유적 합성어의 의미구성 탐구", 언어과학연구, (64), pp.1~24 (2013), 언어과학회
- 김명호, "한국 기업들의 기업명 구조 및 작성의도 분석에 관한 연구", 사회과학 담론과 정책, 7(1), pp.25~44 (2014)
- 김익환, "영어 합성어의", 국제학논총, 10, pp.83~98 (2005), 계명대학교
- 노명희, "혼성어(混成語) 형성 방식에 대한 고찰", 國語學, (58), pp.255~281 (2010), 국어학회
- "기업 이름도 브랜드다' 브랜딩 CI로 거듭나야" (2002)[URL]
- 백혜원, "상호변경이 주가에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구 : 거래소 상장법인과 코스닥 등록기업을 중심으로", 석사, 경영학, pp.2001
- 석종환, "영어합성어의 분류", 현대영미어문학, 29(4), pp.105~126 (2011), 현대영미어문학회
- 석종환, "영어의 외심합성어 분석", 언어과학연구, (67), pp.107~124 (2013), 언어과학회
- 송영균, "상호변경이 주주의 부에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 증권학회지, 14, pp.87~101 (1991)
- 오희장, "상호변경이 주가에 미치는 영향", 2002년 제2차 학술발표회, (2) (2002), 학국증권학회
- 윤순석, "기업의 상호변경이 이익조정에 미치는 영향", 한국회계학회 2009년도 하계 국제학술대회 발표논문집, pp.1~24 (2009), 한국회계학회
- 이민우, "‘명사+명사’ 합성어 구성요소의 의미관계 연구", 한국어 의미학, 34, pp.235~258 (2011), 한국어의미학회
- 이상도, "영어 차용어 축약과 혼성어", 코기토, 73, pp.330~352 (2013), 인문학연구소
- 李珠熙, "英語 語形成의 規則性과 受容性", 박사, 영어학, pp.1996
- 이주희, "영어 합성어와 혼성어에 대한 비교 연구", 영어영문학연구, 45(1), pp.197~214 (2001), 한국현대영어영문학회
- 이태희, "CIP에 의한 상호변경이 기업의 이익흐름에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국마케팅저널, 2(4), pp.68~78 (2000)
- 정강옥, "영어 브랜드명의 음성 상징에 대한 소비자 반응 연구", 광고학연구, 13(4), pp.201~228 (2002), 한국광고학회
- 조성문, "기업 이름의 표기에 대한 연구", 언어학, 15(1), pp.1~15 (2007), 대한언어학회
- 지계순, "영어 합성어의 형성원리", Anglo-American Studies, 7 (2001)
- 기업이미지 제고를 위한 기업명 분석과 개선방안, "채수명", 다이아몬드 애드, ~ (1993)
- Adams, Valerie, "An Introduction to Modern Korean Word Formation" (1973), Longman
- Bloomfield, Leonard, "Language" (1933), The University of Chicago Press
- Brinton Laurel J., "The Linguistic Structure of Modern English" (2010), John Benjamins Publishing
- Dirven Rene, "Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics" (2004), John Benjamins Publishing
- Evans, V., "Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction" (2006), Edinburgh University Press
- 서홍원, "Blending in English and English Loanwords: An Optimality Theoretic Approach", 언어학, 19(2), pp.35~55 (2011), 대한언어학회
- Jespersen, Otto, "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part Ⅵ: Morphology" (1954), Bradford and Dickens
- "Acronyms (and other forms of abbreviation)" (2008)[URL]