넬라 라슨의 『패싱』 속에 나타난 과장과 반복으로서의 여성 재현: 버틀러의 수행성 이론을 중심으로
From the Within: Judith Butler’s Performativity and Representation of Black Women in Nella Larsen’s Passing
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Judith Butler argues the possibility of subverting patriarchy from within the system (as the term “subvert” suggests), while other feminists have dreamed ‘subverting’ from the outside. Butler insists that the Others within the system, for example, homosexuals within the heterosexual system, can reveal the artificiality and fictionality of the dominant system by repeating and exaggerating the given/prescribed roles. Nella Larsen’s Passing meets Butler’s concept of performativity as the title itself implicates an African-American subject pretending to be white and following white norms. Passing in Passing, however, is acted not only on race, but on gender and sexuality as well. The fact that the two heroines of Passing are black females makes feminism, along with racial discourse, the main analytical frame of the novella. In particular, under the dominant normative ideology of the Harlem region in the 1920s, the two heroines, black middle class housewives, strive to survive as either white or black and their struggling becomes complicated and severe. However, through this complexity and severity of their lives, which neither fit the norm nor deviated from it completely, Passing discloses the fictionality of white, heterosexual, and patriarchal ideology. This article reexamines the issue of female representation in Passing, especially the representation of black women, through Butler’s concept of performativity: Clare’s (overt) representation of women’s beauty and Irene’s performance of the Angel in the House. Clare’s excessive representation of female beauty debunks the male subject’s or observer’s standard on aesthetics, according to which, only women “proper” enough to be contained within the male’s scope of understanding can then be judged “beautiful.” Irene’s repetition of an angel in the house also represents the dilemma of the “true (white) woman”– or a slave master’s wife in the antebellum South – who had to maintain the “house” in the face of her husband’s tacit infidelity with the other woman, the black slave. Hence, the two females’ passings represent the myth of ‘true womanhood,’ but the representations in repetition and excess as everyday performance denaturalize the discourse on black women’s gender.
Abstract
Judith Butler argues the possibility of subverting patriarchy from within the system (as the term “subvert” suggests), while other feminists have dreamed ‘subverting’ from the outside. Butler insists that the Others within the system, for example, homosexuals within the heterosexual system, can reveal the artificiality and fictionality of the dominant system by repeating and exaggerating the given/prescribed roles. Nella Larsen’s Passing meets Butler’s concept of performativity as the title itself implicates an African-American subject pretending to be white and following white norms. Passing in Passing, however, is acted not only on race, but on gender and sexuality as well. The fact that the two heroines of Passing are black females makes feminism, along with racial discourse, the main analytical frame of the novella. In particular, under the dominant normative ideology of the Harlem region in the 1920s, the two heroines, black middle class housewives, strive to survive as either white or black and their struggling becomes complicated and severe. However, through this complexity and severity of their lives, which neither fit the norm nor deviated from it completely, Passing discloses the fictionality of white, heterosexual, and patriarchal ideology. This article reexamines the issue of female representation in Passing, especially the representation of black women, through Butler’s concept of performativity: Clare’s (overt) representation of women’s beauty and Irene’s performance of the Angel in the House. Clare’s excessive representation of female beauty debunks the male subject’s or observer’s standard on aesthetics, according to which, only women “proper” enough to be contained within the male’s scope of understanding can then be judged “beautiful.” Irene’s repetition of an angel in the house also represents the dilemma of the “true (white) woman”– or a slave master’s wife in the antebellum South – who had to maintain the “house” in the face of her husband’s tacit infidelity with the other woman, the black slave. Hence, the two females’ passings represent the myth of ‘true womanhood,’ but the representations in repetition and excess as everyday performance denaturalize the discourse on black women’s gender.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김행지, "여성적 아름다움의 이상", 미술사와 시각문화, (18), pp.180~207 (2016), 미술사와 시각문화학회[DOI]
- 문샛별, "넬라 라슨의 『퀵샌드』와 『패싱』으로 살펴본 진정한 여성성 담론과 검은 성모 이미지에 대한 저항", 현대영미어문학, 35(1), pp.69~106 (2017), 현대영미어문학회[DOI]
- "리베카 솔닛 “맨스플레인, 핵심 찌르는 한 단어가 세상을 바꾼다”" (2017)[URL]
- 이일수, ""불가해성"과 중산층 의식--넬라 라슨의 『백인행세 』", 영어영문학, 52(4), pp.885~905 (2006), 한국영어영문학회
- 전혜은, "근대적 주체 이후의 행위성: 주디스 버틀러의 행위성 이론", 영미문학페미니즘, 19(2), pp.153~191 (2011), 한국영미문학페미니즘학회[DOI]
- 조현준, "주디스 버틀러의 인종의 젠더 계보학과 타자의 정치 윤리학: 넬라 라슨의 『패싱』과 레비나스의 ‘얼굴’", 인문학연구, (17), pp.173~212 (2010), 인문학연구원
- Althusser, Louis, "Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays" (1971), Monthly Review Press
- Belsey, Catherine, "Feminisms Redux: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism", pp.164~180 (1991), Rutgers UP
- Butler, Judith, "Gender Trouble" (2006), Routledge
- Carby, Hazel V., "Reconstructing Womanhood: The Emergence of the Afro-American Woman Novelist" (1987), Oxford U
- Caughie, Pamela L., "‘Not Entirely Strange,... Not Entirely Familiar’: Passing and Pedagogy", College English, 54(7), pp.775~793 (1992)
- Cixous, Hélène, "The Laugh of the Medusa", Signs, 1(4), pp.875~893 (1976)
- Harrison-Kahan, Lori, "Her ‘Nig’: Returning the Gaze of Nella Larsen’s ‘Passing’", Modern Language Studies, 32(2), pp.109~138 (2002)
- Irigaray, Luce, "This Sex Which is Not One" (1985), Cornell U
- Larsen, Nella, "Passing" (2004), Dover
- Patton, Venetria, "Women in Chains: The Legacy of Slavery in Black Women’s Fiction", pp.1~27 (2000), SUNY
