본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어회화수업에 나타난 원어민 발화의 담화적 특성

Functional Characteristics of Native Teachers' Utterance in Conversation Class

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study surveys some features of native teachers’ utterance in basic English conversation courses, adapting the functional analysis of Sinclair and Coulthard (1975), Bowers (1980), and Rogers (2002). In case of the relation between function and forms unmarked forms are preferred to marked forms: for example ‘elicitation’ and ‘check’ are realized by interrogative, about three thirds of ‘informative’and 'directive' each by declarative and‘imperative'. As for subordinate acts such as ‘prompt’ and ‘loop’ which do not have instructional purpose, they are often expressed in basic simple grammatical forms like other instructive acts while react un sentence fragments. This shows a little different result from the research of Sinclair and Coulthard (1975). In relation to the instructional act, ‘elicitation’, display questions are used more often than even though much of the referential questions are closed ones. Also, native teachers often use positive politeness strategy for sociative act while they often use bald-on record strategy for disciplinary act. For 'evaluation’native teachers made much use of simple sentences and formulaic expressions. Regarding Sinclair and Coulthard’s (1975) fixed categorization, it needs some change or adaptation because in the contemporary EFL classes some subsidiary acts like ‘discipline’ and ‘sociative’ are taking more important part in native teachers' talk in conversation classes.

Abstract

This study surveys some features of native teachers’ utterance in basic English conversation courses, adapting the functional analysis of Sinclair and Coulthard (1975), Bowers (1980), and Rogers (2002). In case of the relation between function and forms unmarked forms are preferred to marked forms: for example ‘elicitation’ and ‘check’ are realized by interrogative, about three thirds of ‘informative’and 'directive' each by declarative and‘imperative'. As for subordinate acts such as ‘prompt’ and ‘loop’ which do not have instructional purpose, they are often expressed in basic simple grammatical forms like other instructive acts while react un sentence fragments. This shows a little different result from the research of Sinclair and Coulthard (1975). In relation to the instructional act, ‘elicitation’, display questions are used more often than even though much of the referential questions are closed ones. Also, native teachers often use positive politeness strategy for sociative act while they often use bald-on record strategy for disciplinary act. For 'evaluation’native teachers made much use of simple sentences and formulaic expressions. Regarding Sinclair and Coulthard’s (1975) fixed categorization, it needs some change or adaptation because in the contemporary EFL classes some subsidiary acts like ‘discipline’ and ‘sociative’ are taking more important part in native teachers' talk in conversation classes.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Bellack, A, "The language of the classroom" (1966), Teachers College Press
  2. Bowers, R. G., "VERBAL BEHAVIOUR IN THE LANGUAGE TEACHING CLASSROOM", pp.1980
  3. Chaudron, Craig, "Second Language Classrooms: Research on teaching and learning" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  4. Brown, P., "Politeness: Some universals in Language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  5. Cook, G., "Discourse" (1989), Oxford University Press
  6. Dunkin, Michael J, "The study of teaching" (1974), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  7. Ellis, R., "Task-based research and language pedagogy", Language teaching research, 49, pp.193~220 (2000)
  8. Fanselow, John F, "Beyond ‘Rashmon’- conceptualizing and describing the teaching act", TESOL Quarterly, 11, pp.17~39 (1977)
  9. Henzl, Vera M., "Linguisitic register for foreign language instruction", Language Learning, 23, pp.207~222 (1973)
  10. 황기동, "Functional Analysis of Native Teachers’ Talk in L2 Classes", 영어영문학연구, 35(2), pp.255~277 (2009), 대한영어영문학회
  11. Legarreta, Dorothy, "Language choice in bilingual classrooms", TESOL Quarterly, 11, pp.9~16 (1977)
  12. Levinson, S., "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  13. Long, M. H., "Classroom foreigner talk discourse: forms and functions of teacher’s questions, In Classroom–oriented research in second language acquisition", pp.268~285 (1983), Newbury House
  14. Milk, Robert D., "Language use in bilingual classrooms: two case studies, In ON TESOL 1981", pp.181~191 (1982), TESOL
  15. Moskowitz, G., "Interaction analysis- a new modern language for supervisors", Foreign Language Annals, 1, pp.218~235 (1971)
  16. Patil, P. B., "Strategies of Teacher Talk", IRAL, 32, pp.153~163 (1994)
  17. Richard, Jack C, "Charles Lockhart. 1996. Reflecting Teaching in Second Language Classrooms" (1996), CambridgeUniversityPress
  18. Rogers, William A., "Classroom Behaviour: A practical guide to effective teaching, behaviour management and colleague support" (2002), Paul Chapman Publishing
  19. Sinclair, J., "Towards an Analysis of Discourse" (1975), Oxford University Press
  20. Tsui, Amy Bik-May, "Analyzing input and interaction in second language classrooms", RELC Journal, 16, pp.8~32 (1985)
  21. Yule, G., "The Study of Language" (2010), Cambridge University Press
  22. Walsh, Steve, "Investigating Classroom Discourse" (2006), Routledge
  23. Wesche M. Bingham, "Foreigner talk in the university classroom, In Input in second language acquisition", pp.89~114 (1985), Newbery House
  24. Wray, A, "Formulaic Language and the Lexicon" (2002), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)