본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Is PRO Necessary?

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study aims to show that a derivative of the pure stipulation, PRO, should be dispensed with from the grammar, and a bound variable, a bare NP, can successfully replace PRO. Given control involves the relationship between the unexpressed pronouns and the overt antecedents, a pure syntactic approach seems invalid. First, it suggests that PRO is highly deficient and has no Φ-features through comparison with other pronominals. This prevents PRO from the subject position of most finite clauses. Second, adopting Wurmbrand & Lohninger (2020), this paper assumes that infinitival complements come in three different sizes: CP, TP, and VP. PRO is assumed to be located at the subject position of the VP corresponding to the theta domain among them. From those two assumptions, it concludes that a referential variable, bare NP provides sufficient functions for an argument structure of the VP complements in narrow syntax. The overt case of PRO in Icelandic and the plural subject meaning of partial control are derived post-syntactically.

Abstract

This study aims to show that a derivative of the pure stipulation, PRO, should be dispensed with from the grammar, and a bound variable, a bare NP, can successfully replace PRO. Given control involves the relationship between the unexpressed pronouns and the overt antecedents, a pure syntactic approach seems invalid. First, it suggests that PRO is highly deficient and has no Φ-features through comparison with other pronominals. This prevents PRO from the subject position of most finite clauses. Second, adopting Wurmbrand & Lohninger (2020), this paper assumes that infinitival complements come in three different sizes: CP, TP, and VP. PRO is assumed to be located at the subject position of the VP corresponding to the theta domain among them. From those two assumptions, it concludes that a referential variable, bare NP provides sufficient functions for an argument structure of the VP complements in narrow syntax. The overt case of PRO in Icelandic and the plural subject meaning of partial control are derived post-syntactically.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Bobaljik, J. D., "The Oxford handbook of case", pp.44~58 (2008), Oxford University Press
  2. Bresnan, J., "Control and complementation", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.343~434 (1982)
  3. Cardinaletti, A., "5 clitics in the languages of Europe", pp.145~234 (1999), De Gruyter Mouton
  4. Chomsky, N., "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
  5. Chomsky, N., "Knowledge of language : Its nature, origin and use" (1986), Praeger
  6. Chomsky, N., "Syntax: An international handbook of temporary research, Vol. 1", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
  7. Culicover, P. W., "Control is not movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.493~512 (2001)
  8. Hornstein, N., "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
  9. Hornstein, N, "Minimalist syntax", pp.6~81 (2003), Blackwell
  10. 김성해, "PRO vs. Equi-DP", 영어영문학연구, 52(4), pp.115~132 (2010), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  11. 김성해, "Linguistic Variation in Control Structures", 영어영문학연구, 63(3), pp.187~205 (2021), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  12. Kratzer, A., "Making a pronoun : Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.187~237 (2009)
  13. Landau, I, "Elements of control", Doctoral, pp.1999
  14. Landau, I., "A two-tiered theory of control" (2015), MIT Press
  15. Martin, R., "A minimalist theory of PRO and control", Doctoral, pp.1996
  16. Martin, R., "Null case and the distribution of PRO", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.141~166 (2001)
  17. McFadden, T., "Finiteness in South Asian languages : An introduction", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32, pp.1~27 (2014)
  18. Miyagawa, S., "Why agree? why move?" (2009), MIT Press
  19. Patel-Grosz, P., "Pronominal typology and the de se", de re distinction, 2019, pp.43, 537~587
  20. Postal, P., "On raising" (1974), MIT Press
  21. "An economy theory of PRO" (2022)[URL]
  22. Sigurðsson, H. A., "The case of PRO", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, pp.403~450 (2008)
  23. Stowell, T., "The tense of infinitives", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.561~570 (1982)
  24. "An implicational universal in complementation: Theoretical insights and empirical progress" (2020)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)