PRO and pro: With Reference to Idioms
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Control PRO is ungoverned by AGR (i.e., tense) and cannot be changed into an overt element since it only appears as a subject of an infinitive clause (i.e., non-finite clause). The null argument coindexed with the subject in the upper clause can be substituted for the anaphor or pronoun coindexed with it if the null argument is an instance of pro. I argue that the null argument controlled by the ECMed idiom-connoted element in Korean should be PRO. In this vein, control PRO may also appear in Korean. PRO controlled by the ECMed idiom-connoted subject, which occupies the outer spec of vP, may form an idiom with the relevant predicate. It cannot alternate with an overt pronoun and appear in the finite clause. When CP includes PRO controlled by the ECMed idiom-connoted argument, it cannot undergo anaphorization such as kulehkhey ‘so’ since the idiomatic meaning is gone. Thus, the syntactic unit (i.e., VP or CP) involving the null argument controlled by or coindexed with its idiomatic part cannot undergo anaphorization.
Abstract
Control PRO is ungoverned by AGR (i.e., tense) and cannot be changed into an overt element since it only appears as a subject of an infinitive clause (i.e., non-finite clause). The null argument coindexed with the subject in the upper clause can be substituted for the anaphor or pronoun coindexed with it if the null argument is an instance of pro. I argue that the null argument controlled by the ECMed idiom-connoted element in Korean should be PRO. In this vein, control PRO may also appear in Korean. PRO controlled by the ECMed idiom-connoted subject, which occupies the outer spec of vP, may form an idiom with the relevant predicate. It cannot alternate with an overt pronoun and appear in the finite clause. When CP includes PRO controlled by the ECMed idiom-connoted argument, it cannot undergo anaphorization such as kulehkhey ‘so’ since the idiomatic meaning is gone. Thus, the syntactic unit (i.e., VP or CP) involving the null argument controlled by or coindexed with its idiomatic part cannot undergo anaphorization.
참고문헌 (30)
- Ahn, S. -H., "What can Korean say about the v-VP structure?", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, IX, pp.251~264 (2001)
- Aarts, B., "English syntax and argumentation" (2013), Palgrave Macmillan
- 안덕호, "NP-Ellipsis, Its Impostors, and Minor Argument Pronominalization in Korean", 언어, 37(2), pp.345~356 (2012), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Ahn, H. -D., "A study on fragments" (2012), Hankukmunhwasa
- 안희돈, "On the Absence of CP Ellipsis in English and Korean", 언어, 34(2), pp.267~281 (2009), 한국언어학회
- Baek, J., "Verb raising and A", A-bar distinction: Evidence from exceptional Case marking, MIT, 1997
- 조숙환, "한국어 생략적 목적어의 해석과 역동적 심성공간이론", 언어학 연구, (26), pp.241~261 (2013), 한국중원언어학회
- Choe, H. -S., "On (backward) object control in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, XI, pp.373~386 (2006)
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: a life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chung, W., "The derivation of kuleh and its phasehood", Proceedings of the 15th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, pp.71~89 (2013)
- Hornstein, N., "Move! A minimalist theory of construal" (2001), Blackwell Publishers
- 허유회, "이태리어의 pro와 영 주어 매개변인", 언어과학, 12(3), pp.119~138 (2005), 한국언어과학회
- Jung, Y. -J., "Multiple Case marking and its PF interpretation", Korean Journal Linguistics, 26, pp.239~268 (2001)
- Kim, S. -H, "On the distribution and interpretation of pro", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, V, pp.509~522 (1993)
- Kuno, S., "Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
- 이두원, "Case Licensing of the ECMed Nominal by a Light Verb", 영어영문학연구, 49(1), pp.205~225 (2007), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 이두원, "Dative Arguments in Unaccusative and Passive Constructions", 언어와언어학, (56), pp.227~252 (2012), 언어연구소
- 이두원, "Long-distance Anaphor Binding in Lower Subject Positions", 영어영문학연구, 55(2), pp.215~238 (2013), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 이두원, "Do So Anaphora in English and Korean: With Respect to Depictives, Temporal Adjuncts and ECM Constructions", 영어영문학연구, 55(4), pp.483~504 (2013), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 이두원, "Successive Cyclic Binding through the Phasal Edge in the Bi-Clausal Structures", 영어영문학연구, 58(2), pp.303~320 (2016), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- 이두원, "관용적 요소가 조각문, 강조, 대조초점, 이동에 관해 말해 주는 것", 언어학 연구, (40), pp.239~256 (2016), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- Lee, D.-W., "Idiomatic fragment answers in negation", ms, pp.2016
- Merchant, J., "The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, J., "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(6), pp.661~738 (2004)
- 박종언, "On Controlled Subjects in Jussive Complements in Korean", 언어, 36(2), pp.367~393 (2011), 한국언어학회
- Radford, A., "Analysing English sentences: a minimal approach" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Riemsdijk, H., "Introduction to the theory of grammar" (1986), The MIT Press
- Williams, E., "Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.203~238 (1980)
- Yoon, J., "Ambiguity of government and the chain condition", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, pp.105~162 (1996)
- Yoon, J. -M., "The Syntax of A-chains: a typological study of ECM and scrambling", Doctor, pp.1991