내재적- 경륜적 삼위일체 관계에 관한 현대신학의 논의 분석: 존재론, 인식론, 그리고 신비
An Analysis of Contemporary Discussions On the Relation Between the Immanent Trinity and the Economic Trinity
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper centers on contemporary discussions on the relation between the immanent Trinity and the economic Trinity from the perspective of both ontology and epistemology. This paper places identifies seven different positions on the i m m a n e n t-economic Trinity relation briefly: Barth’s mutual correspondence; Rahner’s identity; Moltmann, Pannenberg and Jenson’s eschatological unity; Boff and Pittenger’s “much more than” (the immanent Trinity is much more than the economic Trinity); Bracken’s “immersing” of the economic Trinity into the immanent Trinity); Suchocki and LaCugna’s “absorbing” the immanent Trinity into the economic Trinity); and Lee’s mutual inclusiveness. After pointing out the significance of all these discussions, this paper shows that ontology and epistemology are indispensably woven into the issue, while each position entails certain tensions, ontological, epistemological, or both. It goes further to show that a concept of divine mystery, though not univocally, has been used to resolve these tensions, but in a restricted way to the extent that it is relegated to the second rank, being as a function of ontology and epistemology. Then, while noting the outstanding meaning of mystery [mysterion] in the New Testament which is Jesus Christ, this paper argues that, in order to seek a more fully integrative relationship between the immanent Trinity and the economic Trinity, it is necessary to put a concept of mystery in the foreground, which is Jesus Christ, not merely as a device for resolving epistemological or ontological tensions, but rather that a concept of divine mystery needs to be determinative of ontology and epistemology.
Abstract
This paper centers on contemporary discussions on the relation between the immanent Trinity and the economic Trinity from the perspective of both ontology and epistemology. This paper places identifies seven different positions on the i m m a n e n t-economic Trinity relation briefly: Barth’s mutual correspondence; Rahner’s identity; Moltmann, Pannenberg and Jenson’s eschatological unity; Boff and Pittenger’s “much more than” (the immanent Trinity is much more than the economic Trinity); Bracken’s “immersing” of the economic Trinity into the immanent Trinity); Suchocki and LaCugna’s “absorbing” the immanent Trinity into the economic Trinity); and Lee’s mutual inclusiveness. After pointing out the significance of all these discussions, this paper shows that ontology and epistemology are indispensably woven into the issue, while each position entails certain tensions, ontological, epistemological, or both. It goes further to show that a concept of divine mystery, though not univocally, has been used to resolve these tensions, but in a restricted way to the extent that it is relegated to the second rank, being as a function of ontology and epistemology. Then, while noting the outstanding meaning of mystery [mysterion] in the New Testament which is Jesus Christ, this paper argues that, in order to seek a more fully integrative relationship between the immanent Trinity and the economic Trinity, it is necessary to put a concept of mystery in the foreground, which is Jesus Christ, not merely as a device for resolving epistemological or ontological tensions, but rather that a concept of divine mystery needs to be determinative of ontology and epistemology.
참고문헌 (19)
- The British Council of Churches, "The Forgotten Trinity Vol. 1: The Report of the BCC Study Commission on Trinitarian Doctrine Today" (1989), BCC
- Beeley, Christopher, "Gregory of Nazianzus on the Trinity and the Knowledge of God: In Your Light We Shall See Light" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Grenz, Stanley J., "The Divine Fuge: Robert Jenson’s Renewed Trinitarianism: A Review Essay", Perspectives in Religious Studies, 30(2), pp.211~216 (2003)
- Grenz, Stanley J., "The Matrix of Christian Theology Vol. 2: The Named God and the Question of Being: A Trinitarian Theo-Ontology" (2005), Westminster John Knox Press
- Grenz, Stanley J., "Rediscovering the Triune God in Contemporary Theology" (2004), Fortress Press
- Gunton, Colin E., "Becoming and Being: The Doctrine of God in Charles Hartshorne and Karl Barth (New Edition)" (2001), SCM Press
- Haight, Roger, "The Point of Trinitarian Theology", Toronto Journal of Theology, 4(2), pp.191~204 (1988)
- Johnson, William Stacy, "The Mystery of God: Karl Barth and the Postmodern Foundations of Theology" (1997), Westminster John Knox Press
- Kaufman, Gordon D., "Systematic Theology: A Historical Perspective" (1968), Charles Scribner’s Sons
- Lampe, Geoffrey W. H., "God as Spirit" (1977), Clarendon Press
- Munitz, Milton K., "The Mystery of Existence: An Essay in Philosophical Cosmology" (1974), New York University Press
- Peters, Ted, "God as Trinity : Relationality and Temporality in the Divine Life" (1993), Westminster John Knox
- Peters, Ted, "GOD - The World’s Future: Systematic Theology for a New Era (2nd edition)" (2000), Fortress Press
- Richardson, Cyril C., "The Doctrine of the Trinity" (1958), Abingdon Press
- Schoonenberg, Piet J. A. M., "The Christ: A Study of the God-Man Relationship in the Whole of Creation and in Jesus Christ" (1971), Herder and Herder
- Schoonenberg, Piet J. A. M., "Trinity - The Consummated Covenant: Theses on the Doctrine of the Trinitarian God", Studies in Religion, 1975, pp.5(2), 111~116
- Schwöbel, Christopher, "Trinitarian Theology Today: Essays on Divine Being and Act" (1995), T&T Clark
- Wiles, Maurice F., "Some Reflections on the Origins of the Doctrine of the Trinity", The Journal of Theological Studies, 8(1), pp.92~106 (1957)
- Wiles, Maurice F., "The Remaking of Christian Doctrine (The Hulsean Lectures 1973)" (1974), SCM Press