삼위일체의 계시적 진리를 위한 필리오케(filioque)의 해석학적 의미: 한국적 신학의 가능성을 위해
A Hermeneutical Meaning of the Filioque for the Truth of the Trinitarian Revelation in the Korean Situation
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is important for the christianity to have the same confession about the trinitarian God. By confessing the same trinitarian creed, the identity of the christianity can be insisted among the religious mixture phenomena through contact with various cultures and religions. But unfortunately, the different perspective of the procession of the Holy Spirit with the relation of God the Father caused to split christianity into two parts, namely Roman-Catholic and Orthodoxy that have characterized two different spiritualities from one another. In this situation, first, it is the purpose of this thesis to recognize the hermeneutical meaning of the “filioque” interpolated in the Constantinople Creed in the context of the establishing the trinitarian Creed. And secondly, through this consideration, it is the aim to disclose a hermeneutical possibility of the ‘filioque’ for the Korean Theology. Already it is known that the filioque is through the On the one hand, it is certain that the theological understanding of the trinitarian God can be fully recognized by the expression of the of the Nicea Creed. On the another hand, the Constantinople Creed is to be understood as the creed that is constituted in the continuity of the Nicean understanding of the trinitarian God. Therefore, in spite of the difference of the paradigm of the describing the relationship of the essence of God with the three persons of God, it is quite necessary to see the divinity of the Holy Spirit in the connection with the Son of God who is revealed through the historical person, Jesus of Nazareth. This confirms the soteriological work of the trinitarian God in the church and, moreover, the eschatological perspective of the saving reality of the trinitarian God. The continuity of the Necea Creed and Constantinople Creed affords us a possibility that we can interpret the filioque interpolation of the west church into the Constantinople Creed as the complete interpretation of Constantinople Creed. In the sight of the historical development after the admit of the Constantinople Creed as the ecumenical Creed it is noticed that the east and west church try to reach to the agreement about the meaning of trinitarian personality of God. It means that the deity of the Holy Spirit can be understood basically in the reciprocal relationship with the Son of God in western Situation. And this did not contradict the eastern viewpoint of the relations between the tree persons of God which designate God the Father as the ultimate ground of the deity. With the conflict case of Photius, the understanding of the divinity of the Holy Spirit is basically divided. From that moment, filioque has been no longer acceptable for the eastern church. In recent time, the contemporary theologians, for the unity of the church, propose that the understanding of the divine Life can include the different assertions about the procession of the Holy Spirit by east and west churches. But the life of trinitarian God must be organized through the event of Jesus Christ, if it is not fallen out of the soteriological standpoint. It means that the filioque understanding as the expression of the correspondence between the immanent trinity and economic trinity is also important to constitute the ordering of divine life in itself.
Abstract
It is important for the christianity to have the same confession about the trinitarian God. By confessing the same trinitarian creed, the identity of the christianity can be insisted among the religious mixture phenomena through contact with various cultures and religions. But unfortunately, the different perspective of the procession of the Holy Spirit with the relation of God the Father caused to split christianity into two parts, namely Roman-Catholic and Orthodoxy that have characterized two different spiritualities from one another. In this situation, first, it is the purpose of this thesis to recognize the hermeneutical meaning of the “filioque” interpolated in the Constantinople Creed in the context of the establishing the trinitarian Creed. And secondly, through this consideration, it is the aim to disclose a hermeneutical possibility of the ‘filioque’ for the Korean Theology. Already it is known that the filioque is through the On the one hand, it is certain that the theological understanding of the trinitarian God can be fully recognized by the expression of the of the Nicea Creed. On the another hand, the Constantinople Creed is to be understood as the creed that is constituted in the continuity of the Nicean understanding of the trinitarian God. Therefore, in spite of the difference of the paradigm of the describing the relationship of the essence of God with the three persons of God, it is quite necessary to see the divinity of the Holy Spirit in the connection with the Son of God who is revealed through the historical person, Jesus of Nazareth. This confirms the soteriological work of the trinitarian God in the church and, moreover, the eschatological perspective of the saving reality of the trinitarian God. The continuity of the Necea Creed and Constantinople Creed affords us a possibility that we can interpret the filioque interpolation of the west church into the Constantinople Creed as the complete interpretation of Constantinople Creed. In the sight of the historical development after the admit of the Constantinople Creed as the ecumenical Creed it is noticed that the east and west church try to reach to the agreement about the meaning of trinitarian personality of God. It means that the deity of the Holy Spirit can be understood basically in the reciprocal relationship with the Son of God in western Situation. And this did not contradict the eastern viewpoint of the relations between the tree persons of God which designate God the Father as the ultimate ground of the deity. With the conflict case of Photius, the understanding of the divinity of the Holy Spirit is basically divided. From that moment, filioque has been no longer acceptable for the eastern church. In recent time, the contemporary theologians, for the unity of the church, propose that the understanding of the divine Life can include the different assertions about the procession of the Holy Spirit by east and west churches. But the life of trinitarian God must be organized through the event of Jesus Christ, if it is not fallen out of the soteriological standpoint. It means that the filioque understanding as the expression of the correspondence between the immanent trinity and economic trinity is also important to constitute the ordering of divine life in itself.
참고문헌 (46)
- 로제, 베른하르트, "기독교 교리사" (1998), 컨콜디아사
- 몰트만, 위르겐, "삼위일체와 하나님의 나라" (1982), 대한기독교출판사
- 몰트만,위르겐, "생명의 영" (1996), 대한기독교서회
- 서원모, "4세기 삼위일체 논쟁의 전개 in: 삼위일체론의 역사" (2008), 대한기독교서회
- 세계교회협의회, "하나의 신앙고백" (1996), 장로교출판사
- 이형기, "동방정교회와 세계개혁교회연맹의 신학적인 대화 in: 삼위일체론의 역사" (2008), 대한기독교서회
- 판넨베르크, 볼프하르트, "현대문화 속에서의 신학" (2001), 아카넷
- 판넨베르크, 볼프하르트, "신학과 철학" (2001), 한들출판사
- 피터스, 테드, "삼위일체 하나님" (2007), 컨콜디아사
- 황돈형, "바르트와 포스트모던" (2004), 한들출판사
- Alston, William P., "Substance and the Trinity in: The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trinity" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Barth, K., "Kirchliche Dogmatik. IV. 1. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 1993", ~ (1993)
- Congar, Yves M. J., "I believe in the Holy Spirit. Vol. I I I" (1983), The Seabury Press
- Courth, Franz, "Trinität In der Schrift und Patristik. Handbuch der Dogmengeschichte Hrg. v. Michael Schmaus und a., Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder 1988", ~ (1988)
- Coakley, Sarah, "‘Persons’ in the ‘Social’ Doctrine of the Trinity: A Critique of Current Analytic Discussion", The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trinity (1999), Oxford University Press
- Dalferth, Ingolt U., "The Eschatological Roots of the Doctrine of the Trinity in: Trinitarian Theology Today" (1995), T&T Clark Ltd
- Frey, Christofer, "Dogmatik" (1993), Gütersloh Verl.
- Giles, Kevin, "Jesus and the Father" (2006), Zondervan
- Harnack, Adolph v., "History of Dogma. Vol. 4" (1958), Russell & Russell
- Haugh, R., "Photius and the Carolingians: The Trinitarian Controversy" (1975), Nordland
- Hausschild, Wolf-Dieter, "Nicäno-Konstantinopolitianisches Glaubensbekenntnis in: Theologische Real-enzyklopädie. Bd. X X I V" (1994), Walter de Gruyter
- Jones, Serene, "Constructive Theology" (2005), Fortress Press
- Kasper, Walter, "Der Gott Jesu Christi" (1982), Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag
- LaCugna, Catherine Mowry, "God for Us" (1991), HarperCollins Pub.
- Leinhard SJ., "Ousia and Hypostasis: The Cappadocian Settlement and the Theology of ‘One Hypostasis’ in: The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trinity" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Lehmann, K., "hrsg. Die ökumenische Bedeutung der ersten Konzils von Konstantinople(381): Glaubensbekenntnis und Kirchengemeinschaft", ~
- Lossky, Vladimir, "The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church" (1957), James Clarke
- Marshall, Bruce D., "Trinity and Truth" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Mackinnon, D. M., "The Relation of the Doctrines of the Incarnation and the Trinity in: Creation and Christ and Culture" (1976), T. & T. Clark Ltd
- Marx, H. J., "Filioque und Verbot eines anderen Glaubens auf dem Florentinum. Veröff. d. Missionspriester seminars St. Augustin 26, St. Augustin, 1977", ~ (1977)
- Migne, J. P., "Patrologia Graeca" (1857)
- Neuner SJ, J., "The Christian Faith" (1982), Collins
- Ngien, Dennis, "Apologetic for Filioque in Medieval Theology" (2005), Paternoster Press
- Pannenberg, Wolfhart, "Systematische Theologie Bd. I" (1988), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Pinnock, Clark H., "Wideness in God’s Mercy: The Finality of Jesus Christ in a World of Religions" (1992), Zondervan
- Race, Alan, "Christians and Religious Pluralism: Patterns in the Christian Theology of Religions" (1982), Orbis
- Robert, Hans Jauss, "Toward an Aestheistic of Reception in: Theory and History of Literature 2" (1982), University of Minnesota Press
- Scheffczyk, Leo, "“Uneingelöste Traditionen der Trinitätslehre.” T r i n i t ä t . Akteulle Perspektiven der Theologie, hrsg. Wilhelm Breuning. Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder, 1984", ~ (1984)
- Schönmetzer, H., "Denzinger-A. Enchiridion Symbolorum, Definitionum et Declarationum de rebus fidei et morum" (1965)
- Schwöbel, Christoph, "The Renaissance of Trinitarian Theology; Reasons, Problems and Tasks in: in: Trinitarian Theology Today" (1995), T&T Clark Ltd
- Thiselton, Anthony C., "the Hermeneutics of Doctrine" (2007), Eerdmans
- Tixeront, J., "History of Dogmas Vol. I I" (1984), Christian Classics, Inc.
- Torrance, Thomas F., "The Christian Doctrine of God, One Being Three Persons" (1997), T&T Clark
- Viscker, L. hrsg, "Geist Gottes-Geist Christi" (1981), Ökumenische Überlegungen zur Filioque-Kontroverse Frankfurt
- Zizioulas, John D., "The Doctrine of The Holy Trinity: The Significance of the Cappadocian Contribution, Trinitarian Theology Today" (1995), T&T Clark Ltd
- Zizioulas, J. D., "Being as Communion" (1985), Vladimir’s Seminary Press