본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Origen’s Theological Methodology as the Dialectic between Theology and Philosophy

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Theologians are assigned with a responsibility that they must understand and articulate God who is disclosed from revelatory experience. It is an effort to state the incomprehen�sible and inexpressible God in and through the finite concept and language of human being. Since the ancient times, theologians are destined to employ thoughts and concepts from where they are socially embedded. Our contemporary theolo�gians are not different. Theology is radically different from other academic disciplines in the sense that its source is originated from the divine who is transcendent from the world. However, as noted earlier, theology must engage itself with other disciplines so that it can express the knowledge of the transcendent God. This article aims at providing a rationale why theologians must pursue interdisciplinary studies. To this end, the article examines Origen’s theological methodology, which situates Christian theology in a dialogue with its contemporary philoso�phy. Before the doctrine of Trinity is constructed, Origen strives to elaborate the understanding of the Father and the Son interacting with Platonism and Neoplatonism. In doing so, he attempts to express the knowledge of God. Nevertheless, Origen does not embrace his contemporary philosophical ideas uncritically. Rather, he revises the idea according to the Scripture and the Church tradition. Therefore, exploring Origen’s theological methodology will empower interdisciplinary studies that our contemporary theologians must pursue to disclose the knowledge of God. In addition, the article will also help to reveal what kinds of theological attitude theologians must take when they are involved with a dialogue with other disciplines. Last but not least, this article will contribute to expand the theological understanding of ancient theologians.

Abstract

Theologians are assigned with a responsibility that they must understand and articulate God who is disclosed from revelatory experience. It is an effort to state the incomprehen￾sible and inexpressible God in and through the finite concept and language of human being. Since the ancient times, theologians are destined to employ thoughts and concepts from where they are socially embedded. Our contemporary theolo￾gians are not different. Theology is radically different from other academic disciplines in the sense that its source is originated from the divine who is transcendent from the world. However, as noted earlier, theology must engage itself with other disciplines so that it can express the knowledge of the transcendent God. This article aims at providing a rationale why theologians must pursue interdisciplinary studies. To this end, the article examines Origen’s theological methodology, which situates Christian theology in a dialogue with its contemporary philoso￾phy. Before the doctrine of Trinity is constructed, Origen strives to elaborate the understanding of the Father and the Son interacting with Platonism and Neoplatonism. In doing so, he attempts to express the knowledge of God. Nevertheless, Origen does not embrace his contemporary philosophical ideas uncritically. Rather, he revises the idea according to the Scripture and the Church tradition. Therefore, exploring Origen’s theological methodology will empower interdisciplinary studies that our contemporary theologians must pursue to disclose the knowledge of God. In addition, the article will also help to reveal what kinds of theological attitude theologians must take when they are involved with a dialogue with other disciplines. Last but not least, this article will contribute to expand the theological understanding of ancient theologians.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 김은수, "‘공교회의 고전적 정통 삼위일체 교리’의 형성과 발전 역사에 대한 연구", 조직신학연구, 27, pp.308~345 (2017), 한국복음주의조직신학회[DOI]
  2. Choi, In-Sik, "Paul Tillich’s Theological Methodology: An Investigation on the Relationship between Philosophy and Theology", Korean Journal of Systematic Theology, 1, pp.7~42 (1995)
  3. Daniélou, Jean, "Origen" (1955), Sheed and Ward
  4. Fairweather, William, "Origen and Greek Patristic Theology" (1901), Scribner
  5. Faye, Eugène de, "Origen and His Work" (1926), Allen & Unwin
  6. Gerson, Lloyd P., "The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  7. Gonzalez, Justo L., "A History of Christian Thought. vol. 1" (1987), Abingdon Press
  8. Harnack, Adolf von, "History of Dogma. vol. 2" (1907), Little, Brown
  9. Kraut, Richard, "The Cambridge Companion to Plato" (1992), Cambridge University Press
  10. Origen Colloquy, "Origen of Alexandria: His World and His Legacy. vol. 1" (1988), University of Notre Dame Press
  11. Origen, "Commentary on the Gospel According to John" (1993), The Catholic University of America Press
  12. Origen, "Contra Celsum" (1953), University Press
  13. Origen, "On First Principles" (1966), Harper & Row
  14. Plotinus, "The Enneads" (1991), Penguin
  15. Trigg, Joseph Wilson, "Origen : the Bible and Philosophy in the Third-Century Church" (1983), J. Knox
  16. Tzamalikos, P, "Origen : Cosmology and Ontology of Time" (2006), Brill
  17. Origen, "The Classics of Western spirituality" (1979), Paulist Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)