본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on the Relation of Chalcedonian Christology with Spirituality in Maximus the Confessor and Schleiermacher's Christian Piety

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this essay is to comprehend the Christology of Schleiermacher in relationship with Chalcedonian Christology, compared with Maximus', which attests to Christology's relationship with spirituality. Schleiermacher's Christology has not deviated from the orthodox tradition, Chalcedonian Christology, but rather reconfigures its combination of apparently disjunct Christological traditions in a new and creative way. Hypostatic union, two natures—humanity and divinity—are united in one hypostasis, is the nucleus of Chalcedonian Christology. Schleier￾macher, however, in and through the spirit of Romanticism, revises that Jesus Christ is in the union between God-conscious￾ness and self-consciousness in which human being's self-consciousness can be emptied and filled with God-consciousness. In this sense, the concept of grace and sin, as the content of soteriology and Christology, is understood through the hypostatic union of God-consciousness with self-consciousness. It is not a familiar understanding of the hypostatic union. However, this evolution of the hypostatic union with consciousness is similar to Maximus' developing way of the hypostatic union with energy and will. Christ has two energies in one hypostasis that is extended to two wills in a person. Will is one of the crucial factors to understand who a human being is, but which has to be understood with self-determination. The self-determination cannot be ordered toward God, but the natural will, created as God's image, can be united by the Divine will in Christ. The two natures went over to two wills, for Maximus, which might be valued as an unconventional approach to hypostatic union. Spiritual theology with Maximus' new comprehending of the hypostatic union is interpreted as Christian piety by Schleiermacher. For this reason, illustrating the Christology of Schleiermacher and Maximus and their relationship is crucial to be connected to the Chalcedonian Christology. This study reveals Christology and spirituality, or Christian piety, as the foundation of doctrine, asserted by Schleiermacher, is in a strong relationship.

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to comprehend the Christology of Schleiermacher in relationship with Chalcedonian Christology, compared with Maximus', which attests to Christology's relationship with spirituality. Schleiermacher's Christology has not deviated from the orthodox tradition, Chalcedonian Christology, but rather reconfigures its combination of apparently disjunct Christological traditions in a new and creative way. Hypostatic union, two natures—humanity and divinity—are united in one hypostasis, is the nucleus of Chalcedonian Christology. Schleier￾macher, however, in and through the spirit of Romanticism, revises that Jesus Christ is in the union between God-conscious￾ness and self-consciousness in which human being's self-consciousness can be emptied and filled with God-consciousness. In this sense, the concept of grace and sin, as the content of soteriology and Christology, is understood through the hypostatic union of God-consciousness with self-consciousness. It is not a familiar understanding of the hypostatic union. However, this evolution of the hypostatic union with consciousness is similar to Maximus' developing way of the hypostatic union with energy and will. Christ has two energies in one hypostasis that is extended to two wills in a person. Will is one of the crucial factors to understand who a human being is, but which has to be understood with self-determination. The self-determination cannot be ordered toward God, but the natural will, created as God's image, can be united by the Divine will in Christ. The two natures went over to two wills, for Maximus, which might be valued as an unconventional approach to hypostatic union. Spiritual theology with Maximus' new comprehending of the hypostatic union is interpreted as Christian piety by Schleiermacher. For this reason, illustrating the Christology of Schleiermacher and Maximus and their relationship is crucial to be connected to the Chalcedonian Christology. This study reveals Christology and spirituality, or Christian piety, as the foundation of doctrine, asserted by Schleiermacher, is in a strong relationship.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Arens, Katherine, "Structures of Knowing : Psychologies of the Nineteenth" (1989), Springer
  2. Barth, Karl, "Epistle to the Romans" (1968), Oxford University Press
  3. 3, "Church Dogmatics III", pp.2009, Barth, Karl
  4. Barth, Karl, "The Theology of Schleiermacher" (1982), William B. Eerdmans Publishing
  5. Barth, Karl, "Dogmatics in Outline" (1959), Harper & Row
  6. Coakley, Sarah, "Powers and Submissions : Spirituality, Philosophy and Gender" (2002), Blackwell Publishing
  7. Coakley, Sarah, "The New Asceticism" (2015), Bloomsbury Continuum
  8. Cyril of Alexandria, "On the Unity of Christ" (1995), St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press
  9. Cyril of Alexandria, "A Collection of Unpublished Syriac Letters of Cyril of Alexandria" (1975), Secretariat du Corpus SCO
  10. Danielou, Jean, "Origen" (1955), Sheed and Ward
  11. Driscoll, Jeremy, "Steps to Spiritual Perfection : Studies on Spiritual Progress in Evagrius Ponticus" (2005), Newman Press
  12. Fisher, Hermann, "Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher" (2001), Beck
  13. Hector, Kevin W., "Actualism and Incarnation: The High Christology of Fridrich Schleiermacher", International Journal of Systematic Theology, 8, pp.307~322 (2006)
  14. Hick, John, "Evil and the God of Love" (2010), Palgrave Macmillan
  15. Jorgenson, Allen G., "The Appeal to Experience in the Christologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and Karl Rahner" (2007), Peter Lang
  16. Kelsey, Catherine L., "Thinking About Christ with Schleiermacher" (2003), Westminster John Knox Press
  17. 김진혁, "Prayer for the Kingdom of God and Spiritual Calmness: A Constructive Study on Schleiermacher’s Theology of Prayer", 한국조직신학논총, (31), pp.101~128 (2011), 한국조직신학회[DOI]
  18. Louth, Andrew, "Maximus the Confessor" (1996), Routledge
  19. Macquarrie, John, "Jesus Christ in Modern Thought" (1991), SCM Press
  20. Mariña, Jacqueline, "Schleiermacher’s Christology Revisited: A Reply to his Critics", Scottish Journal of Theology, 49, pp.177~200 (1966)
  21. Mariña, Jacqueline, "Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  22. McIntosh, Mark A., "Mystical Theology : The Integrity of Spirituality and Theology" (1998), Blackwell
  23. Meyendorff, John, "Church in Eastern Christian Thought" (1975), St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press
  24. Niebuhr, Reinhold, "The Nature and Destiny of Man Vol.1" (1941), Charles Scribner’s Sons
  25. Pearson, Lori, "Schleiermacher and the Christologies Behind Chalcedon", Harvard Theological Review, 96(3), pp.349~367 (2003)
  26. Schleiermacher, Friedrich E., "The Christian Faith" (1999), T&T Clark
  27. Schleiermacher, Friedrich E., "Selected Sermons of Schleiermacher" (1890), Funk & Wagnalls
  28. Schleiermacher, Friedrich E., "The Life of Jesus" (1975), Fortress Press
  29. ockness, Brent W., "Schleiermacher, the Study of Religion, and the Future of Theology" (2010), Walter der Gruyter
  30. Wyman, Walter E. Jr, "The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher", pp.129~150 (2005), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)