필립 피넬(1745-1826)의 정신의학 방법론에 드러나는 의학적 근대성
Medical Modernity Revealed in the Methodology of Psychiatry in Philippe Pinel(1745-1826)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Philippe Pinel (1745–1826) was a leading figure in the modernization of psychiatry in the early nineteenth-century. This study intensely scrutinized the modern beginnings and clues revealed in Traité médico-philosophique sur l'aliénation mentale, ou la manie (hereafter called Traité), the accumulation of his methodology of psychiatry. Hippocraticism was popular among physicians of the time in France. The Traité is heavily influenced by Hippocraticism, namely in the observation and the methodology of médicine expectante. The Hippocraticism in the Traité called for modernization and innovation in psychiatry, given that bloodletting and hydrotherapy were the mainstream methods at that time. The method of observation is embodied in the hospital statistics, medical illustrations, and patient lists in the Traité. All three were the result of the actualization of the practice of observation and moral treatment in daily clinical practice. The characteristics of modern medicine originated in these three methodological approaches and were analyzed with the goal of theoretical psychiatric research by processing raw data obtained from clinical practice. Meanwhile, the partnership between Dr. Pinel and patient/citizen, Jean-Baptiste Pussin (1745-–1811), was highlighted in the Traité. In fact, the Traité can be read as a treatise of psychotic patients in the context of French Revolution. Pinel’s attitude toward non-physician Pussin in the Traité was respectful and very receptive. Pussin was found to have engaged and been involved in medical research and healthcare as a patient specialist who shared his insight into other patients. Pinel also sought to break away from his internal limitations as a medical researcher by accepting this cooperation. His observations as a doctor could no longer expect further advances in psychiatry. This collaboration was an example of patient and public involvement that emerged in modern times when both patients/citizens and healthcare professionals contributed to medicine as experts. This was reflected by the medical authority revealed within the Traité. It should be noted that this co-working model in medical research and healthcare between the two was practiced in the early nineteenth-century. The effect of the mythe de Pinel once again made an imprint on our memories, as the epic of modern medicine is rediscovered here.
Abstract
Philippe Pinel (1745–1826) was a leading figure in the modernization of psychiatry in the early nineteenth-century. This study intensely scrutinized the modern beginnings and clues revealed in Traité médico-philosophique sur l'aliénation mentale, ou la manie (hereafter called Traité), the accumulation of his methodology of psychiatry. Hippocraticism was popular among physicians of the time in France. The Traité is heavily influenced by Hippocraticism, namely in the observation and the methodology of médicine expectante. The Hippocraticism in the Traité called for modernization and innovation in psychiatry, given that bloodletting and hydrotherapy were the mainstream methods at that time. The method of observation is embodied in the hospital statistics, medical illustrations, and patient lists in the Traité. All three were the result of the actualization of the practice of observation and moral treatment in daily clinical practice. The characteristics of modern medicine originated in these three methodological approaches and were analyzed with the goal of theoretical psychiatric research by processing raw data obtained from clinical practice. Meanwhile, the partnership between Dr. Pinel and patient/citizen, Jean-Baptiste Pussin (1745-–1811), was highlighted in the Traité. In fact, the Traité can be read as a treatise of psychotic patients in the context of French Revolution. Pinel’s attitude toward non-physician Pussin in the Traité was respectful and very receptive. Pussin was found to have engaged and been involved in medical research and healthcare as a patient specialist who shared his insight into other patients. Pinel also sought to break away from his internal limitations as a medical researcher by accepting this cooperation. His observations as a doctor could no longer expect further advances in psychiatry. This collaboration was an example of patient and public involvement that emerged in modern times when both patients/citizens and healthcare professionals contributed to medicine as experts. This was reflected by the medical authority revealed within the Traité. It should be noted that this co-working model in medical research and healthcare between the two was practiced in the early nineteenth-century. The effect of the mythe de Pinel once again made an imprint on our memories, as the epic of modern medicine is rediscovered here.
참고문헌 (26)
- Dora B. Weiner, "The apprenticeship of Philippe Pinel: a new document, “observations of Citizen Pussin on the insane”", The American journal of psychiatry, 136(9) (1979)
- Louis Peisse, "La médecine et les médecins: philosophie, doctrines, institutions, critiques, moeurs et biographies médicales" (1857), J. B. Ballière et Fils
- Philippe Pinel, "Traité médico-philosophique sur l’aliénation mentale, ou la manie", chez Richard, Caille et Ravier, ~ (1800)
- Philippe Pinel, "Traité médico-philosophique sur l’aliénation mentale, ou la manie SECONDE ÉDITION", chez J. Ant. Brosson, ~ (1809)
- René Semelaigne, "Philippe Pinel et son oeuvre au point de vue de la médecine mentale", Réunies, ~ (1888)
- ヒポクラテス, "ヒポクラテス全集" (1931), 岩波書店
- 강성은, "필립 피넬(1745-1826)의 정신의학 방법론과 히포크라테스주의", 석사, 인문사회의학협동과정, pp.2018
- 吉田六彌, "ヘ-ゲルの習慣論: 感覺と感情", 哲學論叢, 11 (1983), 大阪大學文學部哲學哲學史第二講座
- 安田徳太郎, "世紀의 狂人: 필립 피넬의 생애" (1998), 하나醫學社
- 여인석, "동아시아 전통의학의 근대성 탐구", 의철학연구, 21, pp.33~54 (2016), 한국의철학회
- 여인석, "히포크라테스와 19세기 프랑스 의학", 의사학, 12(2), pp.5~178 (2003), 대한의사학회
- 자크 주아나, "히포크라테스" (2010), 나남
- R.コールダー, "物語人間の醫學史" (1996), 平凡社
- Ann R. La Berge, "Reinventing Hippocrates" (2002), Ashgate
- Dora B. Weiner, "La psychiatrie entre le roman et l’histoire: le cas Pinel", L’information psychiatrique, 82 (2006)
- Dora B. Weiner, "Comprendre et soigner: Philippe Pinel(1745-1826) La médicine de l’esprit" (1999), Librairie Arthème Frayard
- Erwin H. Ackerknecht, "Medicine at the Paris hospital: 1794-1848" (1967), The Johns Hopkins Press
- Georges Canguilhem, "Écrits sur la médecine" (2002), Seuil
- H. C. Erik Midelfort, "After the Reformation: essays in honor of J. H. Hexter" (1980), Manchester Univ. Press
- Jack Juchet, "Le « surveillant » Jean-Baptiste Pussin à la Salpêtrière", Histoire des sciences médicales, 33(2) (1996)
- Jean-Francois Pelletier, "À l’origine même de la psychiatrie comme nouvelle spécialité médicale : le partenariat Pinel-Pussin", Sante mentale au Quebec, 40(1) (2015)
- Josephine Ocloo, "From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement", BMJ Quality & Safety, 25 (2016)
- Louise Locock, Anne, "The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research", Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 20(5) (2016)
- Michel Foucault, "Maladie mentale et psychologie" (2008), Presses universitaires de France
- Sander L. Gilman, "Disease and representation: images of illness from madness to AIDS" (1988), Cornell University Press
- Walther Riese, "The legacy of Philippe Pinel: an inquiry into thought on mental alienation" (1969), Springer Publishing Company