1960-70년대 한국 정신의학 담론 연구 - 정신위생학에서 현대 정신의학으로 -
A Study of the Discussions on Psychiatry of Korea in the 1960s and 1970s - From Mental Hygiene to Modern Psychiatry -
2
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is to review the emergence of new psychiatrists, scientific rationalization, and popular internalization to reorganize the formation process of modern psychological medicine system. Unlike eugenic psychiatry from the Japanese Colonial Era, the social conditions and contexts forming autonomous system of psychiatry of Korea in the 1960s and 1970s have been concentrated. The discussion approach has been tried to secure two perspectives-treatment and criticism-at the same time and to expand the time and scope of study through the extensive texts such as newspapers, magazines, books, advertisements, and others in the 1960s and 1970s. Through formation of subject, rationalization, and popularization, this study has surveyed the characteristics of psychiatry in the 1960s and 1970s to accentuate complicated conditions and kinetic steps to systemize psychiatry as scientific field to promote treatment of patients by deviating from mental hygiene approaching national mental health from cleanliness and removal. The characteristics are summarized as follows. First, as the ethical models of good doctors, medical paternalistic doctors, and non-authoritarian symmetric doctors have been proposed as good psychiatrists by new medical specialists with experience of globality, a new subject emerges. However, there has been illegalization process of unlicensed medical practitioner excluded by the regulatory authority called “clearness.” Second, the rationalization of psychiatry has been accelerated through the dispute of enactment of Mental Hygiene Law, segmentalization of concept of mental illness, and scientific characteristics. Especially, the disputes over enactment of Mental Hygiene Law focused on criminalization of mental patients brought a result to regulate the patients as the target of humanistic treatment and potential criminals at the same time. Third, popularization of psychiatry has embraced invisible mental illness into popular daily life through visual measure called medicine advertisement, and through the discussion about social neurosis, a new paradigm for diagnosis of Korean society has been proposed. Moreover, by focusing on autobiographical works with voices of patients, this article reveals a new doctor-patient relationship.
Abstract
This study is to review the emergence of new psychiatrists, scientific rationalization, and popular internalization to reorganize the formation process of modern psychological medicine system. Unlike eugenic psychiatry from the Japanese Colonial Era, the social conditions and contexts forming autonomous system of psychiatry of Korea in the 1960s and 1970s have been concentrated. The discussion approach has been tried to secure two perspectives-treatment and criticism-at the same time and to expand the time and scope of study through the extensive texts such as newspapers, magazines, books, advertisements, and others in the 1960s and 1970s. Through formation of subject, rationalization, and popularization, this study has surveyed the characteristics of psychiatry in the 1960s and 1970s to accentuate complicated conditions and kinetic steps to systemize psychiatry as scientific field to promote treatment of patients by deviating from mental hygiene approaching national mental health from cleanliness and removal. The characteristics are summarized as follows. First, as the ethical models of good doctors, medical paternalistic doctors, and non-authoritarian symmetric doctors have been proposed as good psychiatrists by new medical specialists with experience of globality, a new subject emerges. However, there has been illegalization process of unlicensed medical practitioner excluded by the regulatory authority called “clearness.” Second, the rationalization of psychiatry has been accelerated through the dispute of enactment of Mental Hygiene Law, segmentalization of concept of mental illness, and scientific characteristics. Especially, the disputes over enactment of Mental Hygiene Law focused on criminalization of mental patients brought a result to regulate the patients as the target of humanistic treatment and potential criminals at the same time. Third, popularization of psychiatry has embraced invisible mental illness into popular daily life through visual measure called medicine advertisement, and through the discussion about social neurosis, a new paradigm for diagnosis of Korean society has been proposed. Moreover, by focusing on autobiographical works with voices of patients, this article reveals a new doctor-patient relationship.
참고문헌 (41)
- "동아일보", ~
- "경향신문", ~
- "조선일보", ~
- "매일경제", ~
- "사상계", ~
- "청맥", ~
- "한국통계연감" (1964), 경제기획원
- 김지영, "‘명랑’의 역사적 의미론 ― 명랑 장르 코드의 형성과정을 중심으로 ―", 한민족문화연구, 47(47), pp.331~367 (2014), 한민족문화학회
- 신규환, "1950-60년대 한국 제약산업과 일반의약품시장의 확대", 의사학, 24(3), pp.749~782 (2015), 대한의사학회[DOI]
- 이부영, "한국근대정신의학의 역사적 조명-일제에서 한국동란 이전까지", 서울의대 정신과학, 14(1) (1989)
- 여인석, "세브란스 정신과의 설립과정과 인도주의적 치료전통의 형성 -맥라렌과 이중철의 활동을 중심으로", 의사학, 17(1), pp.57~74 (2008), 대한의사학회
- 여인석, "이중철 선생의 생애와 활동", 연세의사학, 9(1) (2005)
- 이나미, "서양정신의학의 도입과 그 변천과정(1)-17세기부터 일제강점 전까지", 의사학, 8(2) (1999)
- 이방현, "일제의 정신질환자에 대한 인식과 태도", 이화사학연구, (45), pp.237~277 (2012), 이화사학연구소
- 이방현, "식민지 조선에서의 정신병자에 대한 근대적 접근", 의사학, 22(2), pp.529~578 (2013), 대한의사학회[DOI]
- 이부영, "정신분열증의 현대적 해석-주로 현존재분석의 입장으로", 최신의학, 4(8) (1961)
- 이부영, "우리는 왜 절망하는가" (1976), 민음사
- 이부영, "나의 「융」연구소 수학시절", 심성연구, 2(1) (1987)
- 이부영, "지중해의 회상" (1993), 정우사
- 이부영, "일제하 정신과 진료와 그 변천-조선총독부의원의 정신과 진료(1913-1928)를 중심으로", 의사학, 3(2) (1994)
- 이부영, "한국에서의 서양정신의학 100년", 의사학, 9(2) (1999)
- 이상목, "의사의 책임윤리의 토대로서 선행과 신뢰", 철학논총, 77(3), pp.213~231 (2014), 새한철학회
- 정승화, "자살과 통치성 : 한국사회 자살 담론의 계보학적 분석", 박사, 사회학과, pp.2012
- 정원용, "근대 서양정신의학의 전개와 변화 과정: 1920년대 초부터 8·15광복이전까지", 박사, pp.1997
- 정원용, "서양정신의학의 도입과 그 변천과정(2)일제 강점기의 정신의학 교육(1910-1945)", 의사학, 15(2), pp.156~186 (2006), 대한의사학회
- 조두영, "효산 유석진과 정신분석", 정신분석, 23(2), pp.73~78 (2012), 한국정신분석학회
- 황병주, "1960년대 박정희 체제의 ‘탈후진 근대화’ 담론", 한국민족운동사연구, (56), pp.239~280 (2008), 한국민족운동사학회
- Yoo, Petrus Suckjin, "Progress in Care & Treatment of Mental Illness in Korea", Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 1(1) (1962)
- Yoo, Petrus Suckjin, "Mental Disorders In The Korean Rural Communities", Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 1(1) (1962)
- 대한신경정신의학회, "대한신경정신의학회 50년사" (1995), 중앙문화 진수출판사
- 대한신경정신의학회, "신경정신과학" (1997), 하나의학사
- 이동식, "노이로제의 이해와 치료" (1974), 일지사
- 이종규, "노이로제" (1973), 개척사
- 임지연, "애도받지 못한 자들 : 자살에 대한 인문학적 성찰" (2012), 쿠북
- 조형근, "근대주체와 식민지 규율권력" (1997), 문화과학사
- 한국 정신의학 백년사 편찬위원회, "한국정신의학 100년사" (2009), 엠엘커뮤니케이션
- 아서 프랭크, "몸의 증언" (2013), 갈무리
- 앤드류 스컬, "광기와 문명" (2017), 뿌리와 이파리
- D. H. 핑크, "노이로제-신경증은 낫는다" (1962), 백조출판사
- 미셸 푸코, "정신의학의 권력" (2014), 난장
- Beauchamp T. L., "Principle of Biomedical Ethics" (2001), Oxford University Press
