공공공간의 유니버설디자인 평가체계 개발 연구
A Study on the Development of Universal Design Evaluation System in the Public Space
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation system using the weighted-values of various users and experts for the public space to apply Universal Design, and additionally to find out the commonalities and differences by comparing the importance of evaluation indicators between users and expert groups. Method: A one-sample t-test was conducted to verify that the components of the public space to universal design application are suitable as evaluation indicators, and AHP(analytic hierarchy process) was performed to derive weight-values for the evaluation system. Results: The importance-values for the total 23 facilities to be used as evaluation indicators were derived by multiplying the weighted-values of each sector, domain, and facility by the disabled, non-disabled, and experts. To summarize the results of overall importance-values derived from the AHP, The disabled showed high-rank weighted-values in facilities of building sector > park & recreation sector > cross domain and low-rank weighted-values for sidewalk and roadway domain. The non-disabled showed high-rank weighted-values in facilities of park & recreation sector > roadway domain > building sector > cross domain and low-rank weighted-values for sidewalk domain. Experts mainly showed high-rank weighted-values in the cross domain and in facilities related to entry and movement to the target space in all sectors and domains. However, it showed moderate importance-values in the sanitary space. The disabled who are restricted to movement have a high demand for universal design in buildings consisting of vertical moving line, and non-disabled people who are not limited to physical movement have a high demand for universal design in parks and recreation sector for increased leisure time. It means that experts are important to recognize the principles of making space because they value cross domain and the key spaces and facilities for suitable the purpose of use. In addition, it can be inferred that non-disabled people have a higher demand for safety than disabled people due to their high importance in roadway domain and facilities of safety and disaster prevention. Implications: The significance of this study is the establishment of a quantitative universal design evaluation system for public spaces considering the different perspectives of the disabled and the non-disabled.
Abstract
Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation system using the weighted-values of various users and experts for the public space to apply Universal Design, and additionally to find out the commonalities and differences by comparing the importance of evaluation indicators between users and expert groups. Method: A one-sample t-test was conducted to verify that the components of the public space to universal design application are suitable as evaluation indicators, and AHP(analytic hierarchy process) was performed to derive weight-values for the evaluation system. Results: The importance-values for the total 23 facilities to be used as evaluation indicators were derived by multiplying the weighted-values of each sector, domain, and facility by the disabled, non-disabled, and experts. To summarize the results of overall importance-values derived from the AHP, The disabled showed high-rank weighted-values in facilities of building sector > park & recreation sector > cross domain and low-rank weighted-values for sidewalk and roadway domain. The non-disabled showed high-rank weighted-values in facilities of park & recreation sector > roadway domain > building sector > cross domain and low-rank weighted-values for sidewalk domain. Experts mainly showed high-rank weighted-values in the cross domain and in facilities related to entry and movement to the target space in all sectors and domains. However, it showed moderate importance-values in the sanitary space. The disabled who are restricted to movement have a high demand for universal design in buildings consisting of vertical moving line, and non-disabled people who are not limited to physical movement have a high demand for universal design in parks and recreation sector for increased leisure time. It means that experts are important to recognize the principles of making space because they value cross domain and the key spaces and facilities for suitable the purpose of use. In addition, it can be inferred that non-disabled people have a higher demand for safety than disabled people due to their high importance in roadway domain and facilities of safety and disaster prevention. Implications: The significance of this study is the establishment of a quantitative universal design evaluation system for public spaces considering the different perspectives of the disabled and the non-disabled.
참고문헌 (11)
- 민병아, "유니버설디자인 관점에서의 디자인서울거리 평가 연구 - 남대문로, 능동로, 강남대로, 천호대로의 4개 사례를 중심으로 -", 대한건축학회논문집, 26(12), pp.13~24 (2010), 대한건축학회
- 박청호, "공공공간에서 유니버설디자인 적용의 우선순위에 대한 공간소비자와 생산자 간 분석", 디자인융복합연구(구.인포디자인이슈), 19(4), pp.113~129 (2020), 디자인융복합학회(구.한국인포디자인학회)
- 박청호, "장애인과 비장애인, 그리고 전문가 세부 유형에 대한 유니버설디자인 적용을 위한 공공공간의 우선순위 인식패턴 분석", 디자인융복합연구(구.인포디자인이슈), 19(6), pp.101~126 (2020), 디자인융복합학회(구.한국인포디자인학회)
- 박청호, "기본원칙의 중요도를 반영한 유니버설디자인 공간환경 평가체계", 대한건축학회논문집, 36(11), pp.85~92 (2020), 대한건축학회[DOI]
- 오찬옥, "공간디자인을 위한 유니버설 디자인 평가도구 및 지침개발", 한국실내디자인학회 논문집, 24(1), pp.23~33 (2015), 한국실내디자인학회
- 정상윤, "서울시 유니버설디자인 보행환경 조성을 위한 보행환경 평가 연구", 대한건축학회논문집, 35(1), pp.117~125 (2019), 대한건축학회
- Edward, Steinfeld, "Universal design:creating inclusive environments" (2012), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
- Geoffrey, Broadbent, "Emerging Concepts in Urban Space Design" (1990), E&FN Spon Press
- Nathan, Glazer, "The American Public Space’ in The Public Face of Architecture" (1987), The Free Press
- Rob, Krier, "“Urban Space”, fifth impression in hongkong" (1991), Academy Group Ltd
- William. H. Whyte, "The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces" (2001), Project for Public Spaces