안함광 비평 연구

Abstract

Poor light in the KAPF unit and gimgijin literature, framed, along with Kim Namcheon vigorous critique of literary theory through the activities program for establishing and deepening a considerable contribution was a critic. Empirical substantiation, especially cherished in a colonial literary theory consistently ranks terms of specificity, yet the contrast Joseon were carefully considered. Kaufman dismissed the same position his machine was made Alyston acceptance of socialist realism on the issue carefully and has expressed cautious attitude. He was in the 1930s accounted for the majority population, while farmers, farmers worried about the depth of the pioneering literature was proposed. Concreteness of the empirical reality to consider that his ongoing attitude had originated from. He recognized the importance of farmers, while literature, the hegemony of the proletariat, by emphasizing the balanced perspective showed. Admission for his creative methodology remains that ultimately led to the dialectical method was creative. Particularity and universality of art, artistic form of professional work, he’s a problem even in broad and flexible stance by reason of professional literature, diagram, to formalize a reflective examination did not forget. He with the authors of literary theories ‘hyeolyuljeok understanding’ was ordered, which honors the concreteness of the empirical reality that stems from his consistent attitude that can be evaluated. After the liberation in his homeland, jaebuk(在 北), while in 1967 before the purges against the Juche Idea of ​​North was led by literary theory. A. D. 1956 specifically stated 『Literary history of joseon』 North Korea published in the literature was written in the first. S greatest literary and after the liberation of his administration for a discussing with the other floor I hope I can.