한국형 복지국가의 철학적 기반

Abstract

The economy grew rapidly due to nationalism, but social welfare policies were not strengthened in order to solve the social problems that occurred in the process. Currently, Korea is faced with the absence of a state management paradigm or state management philosophy due to the remnants of nationalism and neoliberalism that has become a global environment. The necessity of the Korean welfare state is due to the need to quickly cope with social problems caused by rapid industrialization, the lack of an economic performance distribution system, and the need to improve the degree of completion of the measures to cope with social problems. First, nationalism and economic development priority are the first of the national philosophy that affects Korea. In Korea, major sectors such as politics, economy, and administration are still managed by the state. It has not deviated greatly from the basic framework of state-led economic development. Second, Korea's excessive metropolitan-centeredism is causing the development strategy of the metropolitan area to devastate the provinces. Third, it is strongly influenced by neoliberalism both inside and outside the country. Because it is an externally oriented trading country, it is directly affected by neoliberalism, and internally, it is criticized as statistic regulation for the intervention and intervention of the state in enterprises and markets. The philosophical orientation of the Korean welfare state is first, first, it is necessary to consider the law of diminishing happiness and marginal utility in accepting utilitarianism as an operational logic within the state. second. The first principle of Rawls's theory of justice, the claim of a fundamental right to freedom that is compatible and equal, can be a way to mediate the conflict and conflict between the right to freedom. The principle of equal opportunity is the basis for curing Korea's unjust reality, which has been plagued by corruption and corruption. The reality of Korea is that a policy that has a sufficient level of maximum profit for the low-income group, which is the least beneficiary, is not implemented, so the principle of the maximum profit for the least beneficiary can also be a fundamental philosophy in the operation of Korean social welfare. Third, in order to reflect the interests of Korea's civil society devoted to national development, communalism can also be considered as a philosophy for managing state administration. Korea will be compelled to advance into a welfare state due to social problems caused by industrialization, an increase in the demand for elderly welfare due to the aging of the baby boom generation, and excessive gap between economic power and social welfare expenditure. For the Korean welfare state, nationalism, liberalism, and neoliberalism should be overcome, and Rawls' liberal communalism should be actively considered.'