본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

예브게니야 긴즈부르그의 험난한 여정에 나타난 푸시킨 형상 연구

An Analysis of A. Pushkins in Evgenija Ginzburg’s Krutoj marshrut

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The title of this paper is “An Analysis of A. Pushkins in E. Ginzburg's Krutoy marshrut.” As a matter of fact, in Ginzburg’s literary work appear two A. Pushkins: one is the father of Russian national literature Aleksandr Sergeevich Pushkin(1799-1837), the other is Aleksandr Pushkin without patronymic and one of Ginzburg’s contemporaries, on the one hand, and one of the officials in ‘Dal’stroy,’ where Ginzburg was confined as a political prisoner, so called, as a ‘zek’. A comparative analysis of these two Pushkins will be the main content of this paper. Aleksandr Sergeevich Pushkin is a positive figure, whereas Aleksandr Pushkin without patronymic is a negative character. The positive Pushkin plays a role of savior for Ginzburg, but the negative Pushkin is a character who unfolds harsh and difficult situations to Ginzburg. The contrasts of these two Pushkins will reveal not simply the discrepancies between the homonym’s characteristics, but philosophical differences that control Ginzburg’s ontological matters of her existence. The contrasts create the whole diverse levels in poetics of the work. The result of this paper expectedly will make the mastery of Ginzburg’s poetics conspicuous.

Abstract

The title of this paper is “An Analysis of A. Pushkins in E. Ginzburg's Krutoy marshrut.” As a matter of fact, in Ginzburg’s literary work appear two A. Pushkins: one is the father of Russian national literature Aleksandr Sergeevich Pushkin(1799-1837), the other is Aleksandr Pushkin without patronymic and one of Ginzburg’s contemporaries, on the one hand, and one of the officials in ‘Dal’stroy,’ where Ginzburg was confined as a political prisoner, so called, as a ‘zek’. A comparative analysis of these two Pushkins will be the main content of this paper. Aleksandr Sergeevich Pushkin is a positive figure, whereas Aleksandr Pushkin without patronymic is a negative character. The positive Pushkin plays a role of savior for Ginzburg, but the negative Pushkin is a character who unfolds harsh and difficult situations to Ginzburg. The contrasts of these two Pushkins will reveal not simply the discrepancies between the homonym’s characteristics, but philosophical differences that control Ginzburg’s ontological matters of her existence. The contrasts create the whole diverse levels in poetics of the work. The result of this paper expectedly will make the mastery of Ginzburg’s poetics conspicuous.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. Гинзбург, Е., "Крутой маршрут: Хроника времен культаличности" (2016), ACT
  2. Иезуитова, Р. В., "Эволюция образа Пушкина в русской поэзииXIX века. Пушкин: Исследования и материалы. АН СССР. Ин-т рус. лит. (Пушкин. Дом), Ин-т театра, музыки икинематографии. —" (1967), Наука
  3. Карпушкина, Л. А., "Образ А. С. Пушкина в русскойлитературе конца XIX - начала ХХ веков и проблема литературной рецепции", ~ (2003)
  4. Киселева, Л. Ф., "Пушкин в мире русской прозы XX века. Рос. акад наук. ИМЛИ им. А. М. Горького. —" (1999), Наследие
  5. Кузмин, М., "Нездешние вечера", pp.175~ (2013), Комсомолская правда
  6. Розанов, В. В., "Русская литературная критика XIX века: Хрестоматия литературно-критических материалов" (2003), Лицей
  7. Пушкин, А. С., "Собрание сочинении в десять томах" (1981), Издательство “Правда”
  8. "ttps:", rustih.ru

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)