日韓の依頼場面における言いさし表現-スピーチレベルによる使用様相を中心に-
A Study of Interrupted Speeches in the Request Scenes in Japanese and Korean -Focusing on the Usage Aspects According to the Speech Level-
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, interrupted Speeches in the request scenes in Japanese and Korean were analyzed by the appearance ratio and the speech level. The appearance ratio of Interrupted Speeches were 56% in Japanese and 45% in Korean. It is important to notice that there are differences between Japanese and Korean. Speech level was classified into Formal Style and Informal Style. Formal Style is a relationship between a speaker and a listener who use polite way of speaking in the conversation, while Informal Style, a relationship between a speaker and a listener, use casual way of speaking in the conversation. The result of speech level showed that in the case of Formal style, Japanese and Korean accounted for 63% and 43% each. There was no significant difference in the results of Informal Style between Japanese and Korean.. In the Japanese Formal Style, the Interrupted Speech and desire expressions were co-occurred, and many requesting speeches were observed. In contrast, in Korean Formal Style, many co-occurrences with 'jom' were observed. In the Japanese Informal Style, the Interrupted Speech "kedo" form was often used. In Korean Informal Style, the '-neunde' and '-ko' forms were often observed. The speaker co-occurred with these expressions and Interrupted Speeches to make the request.
Abstract
In this paper, interrupted Speeches in the request scenes in Japanese and Korean were analyzed by the appearance ratio and the speech level. The appearance ratio of Interrupted Speeches were 56% in Japanese and 45% in Korean. It is important to notice that there are differences between Japanese and Korean. Speech level was classified into Formal Style and Informal Style. Formal Style is a relationship between a speaker and a listener who use polite way of speaking in the conversation, while Informal Style, a relationship between a speaker and a listener, use casual way of speaking in the conversation. The result of speech level showed that in the case of Formal style, Japanese and Korean accounted for 63% and 43% each. There was no significant difference in the results of Informal Style between Japanese and Korean.. In the Japanese Formal Style, the Interrupted Speech and desire expressions were co-occurred, and many requesting speeches were observed. In contrast, in Korean Formal Style, many co-occurrences with 'jom' were observed. In the Japanese Informal Style, the Interrupted Speech "kedo" form was often used. In Korean Informal Style, the '-neunde' and '-ko' forms were often observed. The speaker co-occurred with these expressions and Interrupted Speeches to make the request.
참고문헌 (23)
- 元智恩, "断わりとして用いられた日韓の“言いさし文”についての語用論的分析", 日語日文学, 13, pp.81~95 (2000)
- 元智恩, "断わりとして用いられた日韓両言語の“中途終了文”-ポライトネスの観点から-", 日本語科学, 18, pp.7~70 (2005)[DOI]
- 宇佐美まゆみ, "談話レベルから見た敬語使用-スピ-チレベルシフト生起の条件と機能-", 学苑, 662, pp.27~42 (1995)
- 岡田安代, "日本人は、なぜ文末まで言わないのか？ー会話を成り立たせる“共話”の原理ー", 月刊日本語, 4, pp.9~13 (1991)[DOI]
- 荻原稚佳子, "言いさし発話の解釈理論:“会話目的達成スキーマ”による展開", 30~38 (2008)
- 小此木江利菜(오코노기 에리나), "依頼談話における言いさし表現 「けど」に関する考察 ―機能と負担度に着目して―", 日本文化學報, (86), pp.25~41 (2020), 한국일본문화학회[DOI]
- 柏崎秀子, "談話の展開と表現が聞き手の印象評定に及ぼす影響-“実験語用論”の試み—", 東京工業大学留学生センター年報, 49~54 (2001)
- 蒲谷宏, "敬語表現ハンドブック", 106~112 (2009)
- 蒲谷宏, "待遇コミュニケーション論", 287~294 (2013)
- 金珍娥, "談話論と文法論：日本語と韓国語を照らす", pp.203~247 (2013)
- 白川博之, "“言いさし文”の研究", pp.15~38 (2009)
- 高木丈也, "日本語と韓国語の談話におけるいわゆる“中途終了発話文”の出現とその機能", 社会言語科学, 15, pp.89~101 (2012)
- 高木丈也, "日本語と朝鮮語の談話における形式と機能の関係—中途終了発話文の出現を中心に—", 59~89 (2018)
- 曺英南, "言いさし表現に関する日韓対照研究", pp.89~94 (2004)
- 曺英南, "字幕付き映画における韓日の言いさし表現の対応関係:“述部有り”の言いさし表現を中心として", 言語文化と日本語教育, 27, pp.102~115 (2005)
- 陳文敏, "日本語母語話者の会話に見られる“中途終了型”発話:表現形式及びその生起の理由", 言葉と文化, 1, pp.125~141 (2000)
- 日高水穂, "“察し合い”の談話展開に見られる日本語の配慮言語行動, 「配慮」はどのように示されるか", pp.91~112 (2012)
- 水谷信子, "待遇表現指導の方法", 日本語教育, 69, pp.24~35 (1991)
- 三原嘉子, "接続助詞ケレドモの終助詞的用法に関する一考察", 横浜国立大学留学生センター紀要, 2, pp.79~89 (1995)[DOI]
- 村井巻子, "“断り”行為において好感と不快感を決定する要因は何か:“スピーチ・レベル”と“方略”の二つの方策から", 筑波大学地域研究, 30, pp.17~30 (2009)
- 渡辺吉鎔, "朝鮮語のすすめ:日本語からの視点", pp.42~63 (1981), 講談社
- 조영남, "일본어 교육과 담화 분석", pp.140~156 (2010)
- Leech,Geoffrey, N., "The Pragmatics of Politeness", pp.192~195 (2020)