전쟁을 유희화하는 아동의 연설과 소국민화
The speech of children entertaining war and inculcation of nationalism on Japanese children
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the history of mankind, war has represented violent and inhumane aspects through variously edited storytelling and visual image devices. While children in the 'narrative' and 'image' of wars are immature human beings, they stand out as either a victim or assailant. In this context, Japanese children learned war ideology through schooling, applied to all citizens, and extracurricular activities during the Sino-Japanese war. Of many war-related games, 'War Sugoroku', characterized by being individualized and competitive, and 'War Speech', promoting group consciousness, were noteworthy representatives. These plays showed the muscular identity of war, in which a child turned into a 'temporary adult man' with the virtual experiences of war. Anthropologically, war originated in a game. However, the war speech during the Sino-Japanese war requested a hero mask and fragmented the innocence of childhood with an emphasis on patriotism as a nation-state beyond the inherent concept of play. In a forced nationalism, children had to exploit games even as productive entertainment for the nation. Manipulated battlefield experiences secured objectivity through newspapers and then were edited through war speech. The content of the war speech symbolized the non-existence of the Sino at the national level and inhumane humiliation by dismantling the Sino people into the toy level on the child stage. 'Chan Chan', an inhuman and destructive speech, pushed Japanese people into a falsified illusion to become a soldier of the civilized nation, Japan- that is, a 'hero' as it stimulated and detailed hatred and hostility toward the Sino soldiers. The pursuit of pleasure through fantasy is essential in a game. Eventually, the war speech became public entertainment to verify the Japanese national identity and generate 'prospective citizens' to take death on the battlefield for granted through racism toward the enemy, the Sino. All in all, the war speech was a typical militaristic war game to routinize loyalty and patriotism toward the Japanese emperor, Tenno, as well as a connected point to identify their existence as a nation and as citizens.
Abstract
In the history of mankind, war has represented violent and inhumane aspects through variously edited storytelling and visual image devices. While children in the 'narrative' and 'image' of wars are immature human beings, they stand out as either a victim or assailant. In this context, Japanese children learned war ideology through schooling, applied to all citizens, and extracurricular activities during the Sino-Japanese war. Of many war-related games, 'War Sugoroku', characterized by being individualized and competitive, and 'War Speech', promoting group consciousness, were noteworthy representatives. These plays showed the muscular identity of war, in which a child turned into a 'temporary adult man' with the virtual experiences of war. Anthropologically, war originated in a game. However, the war speech during the Sino-Japanese war requested a hero mask and fragmented the innocence of childhood with an emphasis on patriotism as a nation-state beyond the inherent concept of play. In a forced nationalism, children had to exploit games even as productive entertainment for the nation. Manipulated battlefield experiences secured objectivity through newspapers and then were edited through war speech. The content of the war speech symbolized the non-existence of the Sino at the national level and inhumane humiliation by dismantling the Sino people into the toy level on the child stage. 'Chan Chan', an inhuman and destructive speech, pushed Japanese people into a falsified illusion to become a soldier of the civilized nation, Japan- that is, a 'hero' as it stimulated and detailed hatred and hostility toward the Sino soldiers. The pursuit of pleasure through fantasy is essential in a game. Eventually, the war speech became public entertainment to verify the Japanese national identity and generate 'prospective citizens' to take death on the battlefield for granted through racism toward the enemy, the Sino. All in all, the war speech was a typical militaristic war game to routinize loyalty and patriotism toward the Japanese emperor, Tenno, as well as a connected point to identify their existence as a nation and as citizens.
참고문헌 (13)
- 김경리, "전쟁의 학습과 대중성 획득의 방법론 - 청일전쟁스고로쿠(絵双六)와 환등회(幻燈會)를 중심으로 -", 일본학보, (107), pp.215~235 (2016), 한국일본학회
- 단국대학교 동양학연구원, "근대 일본의 전쟁과 전쟁영웅" (2014), 단국대학교 출판부
- 침공 관련 이미지를 중심으로 -, "동북아역사논총", 2013, 83~112, pp.동북아역사재단
- 이현정, "청일전쟁과 메이지 시대 소년잡지 — 『소년원』(少年園)을 중심으로", 용봉인문논총, (44), pp.191~209 (2014), 인문학연구소
- 이치석, "전쟁과 학교" (2005), (주)도서출판 삼인
- 조국래, "교육적 설득 연설의 연구" (2006), 역락
- 佐々木真木人, "日淸戰爭「国民」の誕生" (2009), 講談社現代新書
- 杉谷修一, "明治後期の小学校における戦争遊戱の成立過程", 西南女学院大学紀要, 15, pp.45~54 (2011)
- 副田義也, "敎育勅語の社會史-ナジョナリズムの創出と挫折" (1997), 株式會社有信堂高文社
- 大日本雄辯會, "現代名家大演說集" (1933), 大日本雄辯會
- 大日本雄辯會講談社, "Daeilbon ungbyeonhyeopoe Godansya Syowa cheongnyeon ungby eonjip" (1935), 大日本雄辯會講談社
- 福間良明, "戰爭社會學の構想-制度・體驗・メディア" (2013), 勉誠出版株式會社
- "아사히신문(朝日新聞) 아카이브", ~
