본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 입력 모드의 차이에 따른 요약쓰기의 어휘적 특성 비교

An investigation of lexical features in the writing of ‘Dicto-comps’ and ‘Summaries’

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Previous research has shown that writing may overload working memory compared with listening and reading. Those studies, however, have failed to statistically distinguish the difference between listening and reading in terms of the load of working memory. By analyzing writing products of ‘Dicto-comps (input through listening)’ and ‘Summaries (input through reading),’ it was examined as to how many of the words in the original text used in the source of input could be transferred to writing. For the study, 50 college students participated in two types of writin tasks. The results of the study were different from the initial hypothesis that fewer words would be recalled in the summarizing task in comparison to the dicto-comp task. It was statistically proved that the dicto-comp tasks had helped the learners to more easily transfer the lexical items that they had heard in the input to their writing products. These results imply that reading may overload working memory more than listening. That is, decoding letters can be expected to be an extra cognitive burden when reading. Additional analysis for variables, such as, ‘similarity of adjacent sentence syntax,’‘age of acquisition for content words,’‘familiarity for content words,’ and ‘Coh-Metrix L2 readabiliy’ were found to have significant effects on the recall of vocabulary when summarizing for the original text read. Consequently, the results of this study suggest some pedagogical implications (e.g., measuring L2's productive vocabulary knowledge).

Abstract

Previous research has shown that writing may overload working memory compared with listening and reading. Those studies, however, have failed to statistically distinguish the difference between listening and reading in terms of the load of working memory. By analyzing writing products of ‘Dicto-comps (input through listening)’ and ‘Summaries (input through reading),’ it was examined as to how many of the words in the original text used in the source of input could be transferred to writing. For the study, 50 college students participated in two types of writin tasks. The results of the study were different from the initial hypothesis that fewer words would be recalled in the summarizing task in comparison to the dicto-comp task. It was statistically proved that the dicto-comp tasks had helped the learners to more easily transfer the lexical items that they had heard in the input to their writing products. These results imply that reading may overload working memory more than listening. That is, decoding letters can be expected to be an extra cognitive burden when reading. Additional analysis for variables, such as, ‘similarity of adjacent sentence syntax,’‘age of acquisition for content words,’‘familiarity for content words,’ and ‘Coh-Metrix L2 readabiliy’ were found to have significant effects on the recall of vocabulary when summarizing for the original text read. Consequently, the results of this study suggest some pedagogical implications (e.g., measuring L2's productive vocabulary knowledge).

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 2015 개정 영어과 교육과정, "교육부", 교육부, ~ (2015)
  2. 이동주, "Coh-Metrix를 활용한 새로운 이독 지수 개발을 위한 기초 연구", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 15(12), pp.1005~1027 (2015), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  3. 이아랑, "영어쓰기 교육방법으로서의 딕토컴프활동 연구", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2009
  4. 이영화, "단편소설을 이용한 Dicto-comp 기법이 영어학습에 미치는 효과에 관한 연구", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2004
  5. 이지현, "한국의 대학 신입생의 영어 요약문 작성 능력 분석", 영어교육, 66(2), pp.307~333 (2011), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  6. 전혜신, "영어뉴스 활용 받아쓰기 작문을 통한 중학교 학습자의 영어쓰기 양상에 관한 사례연구", 석사, 영어교육전공, pp.2013
  7. 정동수, "영문독해와 속독지도", 영어교육, 33, pp.47~56 (1987)
  8. 조윤주, "받아쓰기 작문이 중학생 영어 글쓰기 향상에 미치는 영향", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2008
  9. 崔圭淑, "Dicto-Comp를 통한 쓰기 능력 향상에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.1991
  10. 최영희, "Dicto-Comp 기법을 활용한 영어쓰기에 관한 학습 효과 : 주니어 인터넷 영자신문을 중심으로", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2011
  11. 최진환, "Dicto-comp와 Dictogloss 활동이 고등학생 영어 듣기 및 쓰기 능력 향상에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2016
  12. 허현주, "상호협력 딕토콤프 수업을 통한 한국 고등학교 학생들의 영어 쓰기 발달: 결과, 과정, 인식을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2015
  13. 황수정, "한국 고등학생의 영어 텍스트 요약에 영향을 미치는 요인들 : 사용언어, 능숙도, 텍스트 구조를 중심으로", 석사, 영어, pp.2002
  14. Adams, R., "The relationship between working memory and L2 reading comprehension", Applied Research on English Language, 3(2), pp.19~34 (2014)
  15. Adel, R., "Effects of dicto-comp and dictation on the writing skill of female adult Iranian EFL learners", English Language Teaching, 8(11), pp.17~27 (2015)
  16. Bourdin, B., "Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach", International Journal of Psychology, 29, pp.591~620 (1994)
  17. Bourdin, B., "Even in adults, written production is still more costly than oral production", International Journal of Psychology, 37, pp.219~227 (2002)
  18. Brown, A. L., "Macro rules for summarization texts : The development of expertise", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp.1~14 (1983)
  19. Brown, A. L., "The development of strategies for studying texts", Child Development, 49, pp.1076~1088 (1978)
  20. Brown, H. D., "Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy" (2001), Pearson Longman
  21. Celce-Murcia, M., "Techniques and resources in teaching grammar" (1988), Oxford University Press
  22. Daneman, M., "Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context", Journal of Memory and Language, 25, pp.1~18 (1986)
  23. Fazio, B., "The effect of presentation rate on serial memory in young children with specific language impairment", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, pp.1375~1383 (1998)
  24. Garner, R., "Effects of text manipulations on quality of written summaries", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, pp.139~149 (1985)
  25. Gilhooly, K. L., "Age of acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity and ambiguity measures for 1944 words", Behaviour Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, pp.395~427 (1944)
  26. Gillam, R. B., "Putting memory to work in language intervention : implications for practitioners", Topics in Language Disorders, 18(1), pp.72~79 (1997)
  27. Goodman, K. S., "What’s whole in whole language?" (1986), Heinemann
  28. (2002)[URL]
  29. Hidi S., "Producing written summaries : Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction", Review of Educational Research, 56(4), pp.473~493 (1986)
  30. 황혜진, "A comparison of summarizations of different text genres and their relationships to reading ability", 응용언어학, 26(3), pp.69~99 (2010), 한국응용언어학회
  31. Ilson, R., "The dicto-comp : A specialized technique for controlling speech and writing in language learning", Language Learning, 12(4), pp.299~301 (1962)
  32. Jensen, L., "Teaching second language reading for academic purpose", pp.103~124 (1986), Addison-Wesley Publishing
  33. Just, M., "A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory", Psychological Review, 99, pp.122~149 (1992)
  34. Kim, S., "An analysis of Korean EFL readers’ summarization of L2 texts", English Teaching, 53(4), pp.63~91 (1998)
  35. 김양희, "Students' Learning Processes and Outcomes through Text Summary as a Reading Strategy", 영어학, 13(1), pp.17~49 (2013), 한국영어학회[DOI]
  36. 고명희, "Summary writing instruction and student learning outcome", 영어교육, 64(2), pp.125~149 (2009), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  37. Kleinmann, H. H., "The dicto-comp revisited", Foreign Language Annals, 13(5), pp.379~383 (1980)
  38. Krisnanda, Y. C. W., "The effect of using dictation-composition(dicto-comp) in teaching narrative writing on the students' writing achievement", pp.2004
  39. Nation, I. S. P., "Dictation, dicto-comp, and related technique", English Teaching Forum, 29(4), pp.12~14 (1991)
  40. Nation, I. S. P., "Researching and analyzing vocabulary" (2011), Heinle Cengage Learning
  41. Olive T, "Working memory in writing: Empirical evidence from the dual-task technique", European Psychologist, 9, pp.32~42 (2004)
  42. Peverly S. T., "The importance of handwriting speed in adult writing", Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, pp.197~216 (2006)
  43. Richards, J. C., "Curriculum development in language education" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  44. Riley, P. M., "The dicto-comp", English Teaching Forum, 10(1), pp.21~23 (1972)
  45. Rinehart, S. D., "Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying", Reading Research Quarterly, 21, pp.422~438 (1986)
  46. Rivers, W. M., "Teaching foreign-language skills" (1981), University of Chicago Press
  47. Tierney, R. J., "Toward a composing model of reading", Language Arts, 60, pp.569~580 (1983)
  48. Tierney, R. J., "Handbook of reading research", pp.246~280 (1991), Longman
  49. Tindle, R., "Writing, reading, and listening differentially overload working memory performance across the serial position curve", Advances in cognitive psychology, 11(4), pp.147~155 (2015)
  50. Waters, G. S., "The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension", The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(A), pp.51~79 (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)