본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

통역은 단어치환이 아니다?: 동시통역에서의 단어치환 양상 연구

Interpreting: Not a transcoding?: On the Proposition of Interpretative Theory (Seleskovitch)

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

Transcoding as a strategy of interpreting has been long neglected since Seleskovitch(1968) advanced “theorie du sens”. However, the results of an interpreting act clearly show that both strategies of interpreting, namely transcoding and reformulation (on the basis of interpreters' own non-verbal concept), are at work. This study was aimed at exploring 1) to what extend a text is exactly transcoded in simultaneous interpreting and 2) what kinds of words (regarding word classes, functions and the like) we could observe in this part from the textual interpretation. Four German-Korean interpreting trainees translated six German speeches simultaneously into their mother tongue, Korean. Analyses of these 24 texts – especially regarding two questions described earlier - yielded results as follows: 1) The proportion of transcoded text (complex sentences) lies between 54.36~72.96% and higher than we expected according to “theorie du sens”; and 2) Following categories of words have been observed to be often transcoded: proper nouns > numbers > figurative/emotional words. Conjunction and predicate also showed a high rendition rate. Numerous factors can influence which words are to be transcoded, in which part of a text. Those variables can be explained, however, with a single concept of cognitive resources of interpreters.

Abstract

Transcoding as a strategy of interpreting has been long neglected since Seleskovitch(1968) advanced “theorie du sens”. However, the results of an interpreting act clearly show that both strategies of interpreting, namely transcoding and reformulation (on the basis of interpreters' own non-verbal concept), are at work. This study was aimed at exploring 1) to what extend a text is exactly transcoded in simultaneous interpreting and 2) what kinds of words (regarding word classes, functions and the like) we could observe in this part from the textual interpretation. Four German-Korean interpreting trainees translated six German speeches simultaneously into their mother tongue, Korean. Analyses of these 24 texts – especially regarding two questions described earlier - yielded results as follows: 1) The proportion of transcoded text (complex sentences) lies between 54.36~72.96% and higher than we expected according to “theorie du sens”; and 2) Following categories of words have been observed to be often transcoded: proper nouns > numbers > figurative/emotional words. Conjunction and predicate also showed a high rendition rate. Numerous factors can influence which words are to be transcoded, in which part of a text. Those variables can be explained, however, with a single concept of cognitive resources of interpreters.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 고영근, "고교 문법 자습서" (2000), 탑출판사
  2. 권재일, "국어의 복합문 구성 연구" (1990), 집문당
  3. 이미경, "동시통역 과정에서의 언어방향성과 생략 —한영 vs. 영한 동시통역 데이터 비교", 번역학연구, 14(1), pp.155~181 (2013), 한국번역학회
  4. 원종화, "영한 통역 정확도 평가를 위한 아이디어 단위 연구", 번역학연구, 15(2), pp.123~148 (2014), 한국번역학회
  5. 정혜연, "문맥 안에서 형태 기억하기: 통역사 기억에 관한 경험연구", 통번역학연구, 20(2), pp.129~151 (2016), 통번역연구소
  6. 정혜연, "패러프레이즈 능력과 통역 전문성의 연관성", 번역학연구, 17(2), pp.119~140 (2016), 한국번역학회
  7. Bear, M., "신경과학" (2007), 바이오메디북
  8. Life Expert, "놀라운 기억의 기술" (2007), 기원전
  9. Choi J. W., "The interpretive theory of translation and its current applications", The Japan Association for Interpretation Studies, pp.1~15 (2003)
  10. Christoffels, I., "Handbook of Bilingualism", pp.454~479 (2005), Oxford University Press
  11. Chung, H. Y., "Phonological memory in interpreters", ~ (2017)
  12. Degleish, T., "The emotional brain", Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, pp.582~589 (2004)
  13. Gillies, A., "Note-taking for consecutive interpreting - A short course" (2005), St. Jerome
  14. Halliday, M., "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
  15. Jones, R., "Conference Interpreting Explained" (1998), St. Jerome
  16. Kusztor, M., "Dolmetschen", pp.19~44 (2000), St. Ingbert
  17. Li, X., "How and when predictability interacts with accentuation in temporally selective attention during speech comprehension", Neuropsychologia, 64, pp.71~84 (2014)
  18. Liu, M., "Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting", Interpreting, 6(1), pp.19~42 (2004)
  19. Pöchhacker, F., "Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies" (2015), Routledge
  20. Seleskovitch, D., "Problemes de langage et de communication" (1968), Minard
  21. Seleskovitch, D., "Langage, langues et mémoire" (1975), Minard
  22. Seleskovitch, D., "Language and cognition", pp.333~341 (1978), Language interpretation and communication
  23. Taylor, C., "The theoretical and practical aspects of teaching interpretation", pp.177~184 (1989)
  24. Timarová, Š., "Simultaneous interpreting and working memory executive control", Interpreting, 16(2), pp.139~168 (2014)
  25. Vinay, J. P., "Méthode de traduction (4ème éd.)" (1958), Didier
  26. 염행일, "Emphasis on Meaning in the Training of Simultaneous Interpretation: Special Reference to Interpretation between Korean and English", 번역학연구, 4(1), pp.167~181 (2003), 한국번역학회
  27. "네이버 백과 검색어 ‘통역’"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)