본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

柳永詞와 蘇軾詞의 詞調 比較

A Comparison of the Ci-diao of Liu-yong-ci and Su-shi-ci

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This paper aims to reveal the literary and musical differences of their works by comparing the two representative writers of Song-ci, Liu-yong and Su-shi. Song-ci is the lyrics of a song that was originally popular during the Song Dynasty. However, as the music has disappeared, Song-ci's research has been focused on literary texts. However, it is highly likely that these studies are too flat and do not properly reflect the actual situation at the time. Therefore, this paper intends to plan a combination of Song-ci's literary and musicality using a tool called Ci-diao. There was a fundamental difference between the Ci-diao of two writers. In other words, Liu-yong-ci's Ci-diao actively accepted new tastes of music and created an independent Ci-diao. On the other hand, Su-shi-ci was active in accepting existing and new music in a balanced way and utilizing existing Ci-diao. In addition, although the 19 Ci-diao used by these two writers were the same, there was a difference in form and content. In other words, in terms of form, Liu-yong reorganized the original Xiao-ling ci-diao into a Chang-diao, and Su-shi rewritten it into a Xiao-ling. In addition, in terms of content, Liu-yong was active in expressing emotions while using the form of a first-person monologue, while Su-shi showed a specialized appearance in developing works for specific opponents or describing objects. Through these results, it was confirmed that Song-ci's music at the time had various channels, and that these musical differences led to literary differences. In the future, it is expected that the comprehensive understanding of Song-ci will be pursued by actively utilizing musical analysis tools including Ci-diao.

Abstract

This paper aims to reveal the literary and musical differences of their works by comparing the two representative writers of Song-ci, Liu-yong and Su-shi. Song-ci is the lyrics of a song that was originally popular during the Song Dynasty. However, as the music has disappeared, Song-ci's research has been focused on literary texts. However, it is highly likely that these studies are too flat and do not properly reflect the actual situation at the time. Therefore, this paper intends to plan a combination of Song-ci's literary and musicality using a tool called Ci-diao. There was a fundamental difference between the Ci-diao of two writers. In other words, Liu-yong-ci's Ci-diao actively accepted new tastes of music and created an independent Ci-diao. On the other hand, Su-shi-ci was active in accepting existing and new music in a balanced way and utilizing existing Ci-diao. In addition, although the 19 Ci-diao used by these two writers were the same, there was a difference in form and content. In other words, in terms of form, Liu-yong reorganized the original Xiao-ling ci-diao into a Chang-diao, and Su-shi rewritten it into a Xiao-ling. In addition, in terms of content, Liu-yong was active in expressing emotions while using the form of a first-person monologue, while Su-shi showed a specialized appearance in developing works for specific opponents or describing objects. Through these results, it was confirmed that Song-ci's music at the time had various channels, and that these musical differences led to literary differences. In the future, it is expected that the comprehensive understanding of Song-ci will be pursued by actively utilizing musical analysis tools including Ci-diao.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 소식, "소동파사" (2010), 서울대학교출판문화원
  2. 유영, "유영 사선" (2009), 지만지
  3. 왕력, "한어시율학3" (2005), 소명출판
  4. 劉尊明範曉燕, "宋代詞調及用調的統計與分析", 齊魯學刊, pp.124~131 (2012)
  5. 劉尊明, "東坡詞用調數量和成就的統計與分析", 齊魯學刊, pp.109~115 (2018)[DOI]
  6. 上海古籍出版社本社, "宋元筆記小說大觀(3)" (2001), 上海古籍出版社
  7. 施議對, "詞與音樂關係硏究" (1985), 中國社會科學出版社
  8. 唐圭璋, "詞話叢編" (1986), 中華書局
  9. 唐圭璋, "全宋詞" (1986), 中華書局
  10. 田玉琪, "唐五代词调在两宋的运用", 长江学术, pp.55~60 (2007)
  11. 田玉琪, "词调史研究" (2012), 人民出版社
  12. 吳藕汀, "詞名索引" (1977), 太平書局
  13. 吳熊和, "唐宋詞通論" (1989), 浙江古籍出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)