청말민초 중국 탐정소설 담론 연구 – 계몽주의적 ‘승인’과 ‘배제’를 중심으로
A Study on the Chinese Detective Stories in late Qing dynasty and early Republic of China - With enlightenment approval and exclusion
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study uses various discourses produced by the Chinese intellectual community during the acceptance of Western detective stories from the late Qing Dynasty to the early Republic of China era, to analyze their perspectives on detective stories, the contemporary, ideological contexts, and the relationship of detective stories as a genre. With the popularity of translation of detective stories which began in the late 19th century, Chinese intellectuals began to recognize detective stories as a genre of fiction. Before and after the 5.4 Movement, detective stories were one of the most notable genres of fiction in the Chinese intellectual society, until they were classified and criticized by many literary artists. At this time, modern Chinese intellectuals recognized that Western detective stories could be an important medium for enhancing the spiritual awakening of the people, or the value of ‘enlightenment,’ which was the talk of the time. Based on why Chinese intellectuals were excluded and suppressed before and after the 5.4 Movement, the study examined how the discourse on detective stories was formed and contained in China, and how it was suppressed.
Abstract
This study uses various discourses produced by the Chinese intellectual community during the acceptance of Western detective stories from the late Qing Dynasty to the early Republic of China era, to analyze their perspectives on detective stories, the contemporary, ideological contexts, and the relationship of detective stories as a genre. With the popularity of translation of detective stories which began in the late 19th century, Chinese intellectuals began to recognize detective stories as a genre of fiction. Before and after the 5.4 Movement, detective stories were one of the most notable genres of fiction in the Chinese intellectual society, until they were classified and criticized by many literary artists. At this time, modern Chinese intellectuals recognized that Western detective stories could be an important medium for enhancing the spiritual awakening of the people, or the value of ‘enlightenment,’ which was the talk of the time. Based on why Chinese intellectuals were excluded and suppressed before and after the 5.4 Movement, the study examined how the discourse on detective stories was formed and contained in China, and how it was suppressed.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김용언, "범죄소설: 그 기원과 매혹" (2012), 도서출판 강
- 김효진, "근대중국 탐정소설 형성에 관한 연구", 석사, 문학, pp.2001
- 계정민, "범죄소설의 계보학" (2018), 소나무
- 백광준, "청말, 그리고 외국 추리소설의 번역≪時務報≫의 외국 ‘탐정 텍스트’ 번역을 중심으로", 중국문학, 49, pp.237~252 (2006), 한국중국어문학회
- 박은혜, "청샤오칭(程小青)의 탐정소설(侦探小说)론 연구", 중국학연구, (76), pp.61~82 (2016), 중국학연구회
- 박은혜, "중국의 셜록 홈스 시리즈 수용과 청샤오칭 탐정소설 속 ‘훠쌍’ 캐릭터 연구", 중국문학연구, (67), pp.87~106 (2017), 한국중문학회
- 오순방, "中國小說의 近代化에 영향을 미친 西歐要因探究-- 1890년대후기 傅蘭雅의 時新小說論과 서양정탐소설의 번역을 통해 본 중국소설의 변화과정 연구", 중국소설논총, 6 (1997)
- 오순방, "中國近代의 小說飜譯과 中韓小說의 雙方向飜譯硏究" (2008), 숭실대학교 출판부
- 움베르토 에코, "셜록 홈스, 기호학자를 만나다" (2016), 이마
- 에르네스트 만델, "즐거운 살인" (2001), 이후
- 임춘성, "중국 근현대문학사 담론과 타자화" (2013), 문학동네
- 존 스캑스, "범죄소설" (2013), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 진평원, "중국소설사: 이론과 실천" (2004), 이룸
- 판보췬, "중국현대통속문학사上" (2015), 차이나하우스
- 陈平原, "中国现代小说的起点―清末民初小说的研究" (2010), 北京大学出版社
- 董丽敏, "现代性建构：被忽视的途径―重识文学研究会与鸳鸯蝴蝶派的论争", 上海大学学报, 10(2) (2003)
- 范伯群, "中国近现代通俗文学史（上卷）" (2010), 南京江苏教育出版社
- 任翔, "中国侦探小说理论资料(1902-2011)" (2013), 北京师范大学出版社
- 郝岚, "林纾与柯南·道尔的非福尔摩斯系列小说译介", 新文学史料, (02) (2011)
- 刘半农, "刘半农文选" (1986), 人民大学出版社
- 刘半农, "刘半农侦探小说集" (2021), 北京联合出版公司
- 王治国, "译介译作并重, 译评译论兼通― 郑振铎翻译理论研究", 宁夏社 会科学, (6) (2010)
- 郑振铎, "郑振铎全集. 第五卷" (1988), 花山文艺出版社
- Zhang Ping, "Sherlock in China", Perspectives : Studies in Translatology, 13(2) (2005)