디지털 영상시대의 통번역
Interpreting the digital video era
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main focus of this paper is to illustrate and explain our interpreting and translation actualities which have been continuously confronted with digital technology and its perceptive-oriented culture. Then digital society demand us to transfer and receive the messages as quickly as possible without any reflection for profound comprehension. And the interpreter and translator, who have traditionally worked in the intercultural, interpretative and reflective manners, became to overcome this new historical situation occurred by economical tendency and marketing. For the purpose, I set up firstly some etymological concepts of interpreting and translation, with which the present situation could be suitable for going in harmony. Transmission of message in the interpreting and translating activities is not only confirming of given cultural shares between sender and receiver also cooperating to interpret the messages given by these shared culture. In this cooperation, interpreter, translator and receptor can trace the semantical answer to understanding and empathy that they have wanted together. Because the phrase-centered convention would fall into the error of semantic confusion in their instance of enunciation. In word level, they would lose sense of discursive hierarchy between two words/phrases countered such as grammatical and semantical message communication. This study insist that we need a semantical and cultural adjustment(or strategy of consentment) for pursuit to common understanding by cooperative mutuality. In textual level, they are puff off their sense that all semantic concept is related to speaker-receiver's intentionality and cooperative culture. Linguistic sign do not has competence to designate something in the reality that man can conceive in his everyday life, but in the reality that receiver-speaker conceives as a reality, of which such proposition is a Saussurian principle in our modern linguistics. Interpreting and translation are concerned not only with communicative part of two cultures but with interpretor-translator's semantical cooperation of two languages encountered.
Abstract
The main focus of this paper is to illustrate and explain our interpreting and translation actualities which have been continuously confronted with digital technology and its perceptive-oriented culture. Then digital society demand us to transfer and receive the messages as quickly as possible without any reflection for profound comprehension. And the interpreter and translator, who have traditionally worked in the intercultural, interpretative and reflective manners, became to overcome this new historical situation occurred by economical tendency and marketing. For the purpose, I set up firstly some etymological concepts of interpreting and translation, with which the present situation could be suitable for going in harmony. Transmission of message in the interpreting and translating activities is not only confirming of given cultural shares between sender and receiver also cooperating to interpret the messages given by these shared culture. In this cooperation, interpreter, translator and receptor can trace the semantical answer to understanding and empathy that they have wanted together. Because the phrase-centered convention would fall into the error of semantic confusion in their instance of enunciation. In word level, they would lose sense of discursive hierarchy between two words/phrases countered such as grammatical and semantical message communication. This study insist that we need a semantical and cultural adjustment(or strategy of consentment) for pursuit to common understanding by cooperative mutuality. In textual level, they are puff off their sense that all semantic concept is related to speaker-receiver's intentionality and cooperative culture. Linguistic sign do not has competence to designate something in the reality that man can conceive in his everyday life, but in the reality that receiver-speaker conceives as a reality, of which such proposition is a Saussurian principle in our modern linguistics. Interpreting and translation are concerned not only with communicative part of two cultures but with interpretor-translator's semantical cooperation of two languages encountered.
참고문헌 (59)
- 강상원, "세종대왕창제훈민정음" (2008), 한국세종한림원
- 김봉현, "디지털 쌍방형 방송서비스 환경에서의 제품삽입 및 간접광고(PPL)의 운용방안에 관한 연구", 광고학연구 (2004)
- 김희경, "텔레비전 다큐멘터리 수용자의 기대지평에 따른 텍스트 해석의 차이에 관한 연구", 한국언론학보, 48(6), pp.166~195 (2004), 한국언론학회
- 문화체육관광부, "2011년 한국 콘텐츠 산업 백서" (2012), 한국콘텐츠진흥원
- 박승빈, "조선어학" (1935), 조선어학연구회
- 박승빈, "‘한글맞춤법통일안'에 대한 비판" (1936), 조선어학회
- 방교영, "푸틴 정치담화의 행위소 구조분석 통번역사교육을 위한 탐색적 연구", 슬라브硏究, 22(2), pp.255~278 (2006), 러시아연구소
- 방교영, "통역현장에서 기호학적 도구 적용에 관한 연구", 기호학 연구, 22(1), pp.189~219 (2007), 한국기호학회
- 방교영, "통역의 동시성과 매핑", 통번역학연구, 14(1), pp.85~107 (2010), 통번역연구소
- 신항식, "소쉬르와 퍼스의 인식론 비교", 기호학 연구, 21(1), pp.159~188 (2007), 한국기호학회
- 신항식, "통역의 기호학적 역할구조 -통역 맵핑(Mapping for Interpreting)을 위한 행위소구조의 이론적 탐색", 통번역학연구, 11(1), pp.79~116 (2007), 통번역연구소
- 에노 A, "기호학에로의 초대" (1997), 어문학사
- 이동근, "TV시청자의 메시지 처리과정에 관한 이론적 고찰: tv 드라마와 뉴스를 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 43 (1998)
- 방송진흥원, "방송문자 실태와 문제점 지상파 3사 연예, 오락 프로그램을 중심으로" (2001), 한국방송진흥원
- 이영훈, "한국에서의 번역 개념의 역사", 통번역학연구, 15, pp.129~151 (2011), 통번역연구소
- 최지원, "영화 속 PPL의 배치 유형과 PPL 관련 퍼블리시티가 광고 효과에 미치는 영향 : 영화 <뜨거운 것이 좋아>에 배치된 PPL 브랜드를 중심으로", 한국광고홍보학보, 11(4), pp.241~274 (2009), 한국광고홍보학회
- Agosta, L., "Empathy in the Context of Philosophy" (2010), Palgrave
- Benvenist, E., "Problem in General linguistics" (1966), Univ. of Miami Press
- Bolter, J., "미디어에서 리얼리티란 무엇인가?" (2005), 인간사랑
- Burnett, R., "Cultures of vision: Images, media, and the imaginary" (1995), Indiana Univ. Press
- Chomsky, N., "미디어 컨트롤" (2003), 모색
- "Collins Cobuild Advanced learner's English Dictionary" (2009), Harper Collins Publisher
- Coulson, M., "사회학에의 접근" (1984), 민영사
- Courtes, J., "기호학 입문" (1992), 신아사
- Danto, A. C., "Analytical Philosophy of History" (1965), Univ. Press of Cambridge
- Deleuse, G., "시네마 2:시간-이미지" (2004), 시각과 언어
- Dubois, J., "Dictionnaire de linguistique" (1973), Larousse
- Eco, U., "현대예술과 기호" (1995), 인간사랑
- 한정헌, "들뢰즈와 시간의 세 가지 종합" (2008), 그린비
- Fentres, R, "Social Memory" (1992), Blackwell
- Flusser, V., "코무니콜로기", pp.290~ (2001), 커뮤니케이션북스
- Fourastie, J., "Les Conditions de l'esprit scientifique" (1966), Gallimard
- Friedmann, A., "Writing for visual media" (2006), Focal Press
- Gladstein, G. A., "What It All Means. Empathy and counseling: explorations in theory and research" (1987), Springer-Verlag
- Greimas, A. J., "의미에 관하여" (1997), 인간사랑
- Goodman, N., "예술과 언어" (2002), 이화여대출판부
- Holmes, D., "Communication theory: Media, technology and society" (2005), Sage Publications
- Irigaray, I., "Speculum of the Other Women" (1985), Cornell Univ. Press
- Noeth, W., "Handbook of Semiotics" (1995), Indiana Univ. Press
- Prince, G., "A Grammar of Stories" (1973), Mouton
- PWC, "Global Entertainment and Media Outlook 2012-2016" (2012), PricewaterhouseCoopers Publisher
- Lacan, J., "Écrits: The Complete" (2006), W.W. Norton & Co
- Lotman Y., "The Semiotics of Russian culture" (1984), Univ. Press of Michigan
- Lotman, Y., "예술텍스트의 구조" (1991), 고려원
- Lyotard, J.-F., "포스트 모던적 조건" (1992), 서광사
- Лотман Ю, "Статьи по семиотике искусства и типологии культуры" (1992), Александра
- Rifkin, J., "The Empathic Civilization" (2009), Penguin Group
- Severin, W., "The effectiveness of relevant pictures in multiple-channel communication", AV Communication Review, 15 (1967)
- Shepard, R. N., "Perceptual-cognitive Universals as Reflections of the World", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1 (1994)
- Todorov T., "The two principles of narrative" (1971), Diacritics
- Todorov, T., "Mikhail Bakhtin:The Dialogical principle" (1981), Univ. of Minnesota Press
- Tveit, J. E., "Translating for television: A handbook in screen translation" (2004), JK Publishing
- van Dijk T. A., "The Aspects of Text Grammars" (1972), Mouton
- Zatlin, P., "Theatrical translation and film adaptation" (2005), Multilingual Matters