영한번역에서 명사화 문법은유의 번역 양상 분석
Analysis of Translation Patterns of Nominalized Grammatical Metaphor Expressions in English-Korean Translation.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper aims to analyze translation patterns of nominalized English phrases into Korean done by graduate students ofinterpretation and translation. Such a form of English expression islabeled as nominalized grammatical metaphor in Halliday’sSystemic Functional Grammar. To put it more specifically, thepaper focuses on translation patterns of nominalized grammaticalmetaphor expressions extracted from a science text written inEnglish. To this end, the paper first reviews the notion andsub-categories of grammatical metaphor presented by Halliday andRavelli, and then analyze sentences extracted from the source textfrom the perspective of Systemic Functional Grammar and comparethem with students’ translation corpora on the expressions inquestion. The analysis of students’ translations demonstrates thatthe most common pattern of translation on both nominalized types(Quality → Thing and Process → Thing) was a congruentexpression unpacked as a clause complex. Meanwhile, amongincongruent translations, the most frequent was a nominalizedphase as was the original form of the expressions.
Abstract
The paper aims to analyze translation patterns of nominalized English phrases into Korean done by graduate students ofinterpretation and translation. Such a form of English expression islabeled as nominalized grammatical metaphor in Halliday’sSystemic Functional Grammar. To put it more specifically, thepaper focuses on translation patterns of nominalized grammaticalmetaphor expressions extracted from a science text written inEnglish. To this end, the paper first reviews the notion andsub-categories of grammatical metaphor presented by Halliday andRavelli, and then analyze sentences extracted from the source textfrom the perspective of Systemic Functional Grammar and comparethem with students’ translation corpora on the expressions inquestion. The analysis of students’ translations demonstrates thatthe most common pattern of translation on both nominalized types(Quality → Thing and Process → Thing) was a congruentexpression unpacked as a clause complex. Meanwhile, amongincongruent translations, the most frequent was a nominalizedphase as was the original form of the expressions.
참고문헌 (12)
- 박기성, "영어와 한국어의 명사화에 관한 비교 연구", 새한영어영문학, 51(3), pp.225~246 (2009), 새한영어영문학회
- 이창수, "한영번역 수업에서의 문법적 은유 교육의 필요성", 통역과 번역, 12(2), pp.207~233 (2010), 한국통역번역학회
- 패턴의 번역 실태와 번역투 문제 연구, "통번역학연구", 2012, 197~220, pp.통번역연구소
- 이창수, "한영문학번역에서의 번역문체 연구- 문법은유를 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 14(2), pp.173~195 (2012), 한국통역번역학회
- 이창수, "번역한국어와 비번역한국어 간 타동형 감정구문에서의 무생물 주어 사용 차이 연구", 통번역학연구, 18(1), pp.123~141 (2014), 통번역연구소
- Halliday, M., "Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition" (1999), Cassell
- Halliday, M., "Writing science: Literacy and Discursive Power", pp.4~11 (1993), University of Pittsburgh Press
- Newmark, P., "About translation", pp.74~ (1991), Multilingual matters
- Ravelli, L., "Metaphor, mode and complexity: An exploration of co-varying patterns", Department of Linguistics, pp.1985
- Ravelli, L., "Pragmatics. Discourse and Text. Some systemically-inspired approaches", pp.133~147 (1988), Pinter
- Taverniers, M., "Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics", pp.5~33 (2003), John Benjamins Publishing
- Thompson, G., "Introducing functional grammar" (2014), Routledge