중국 근대 번역의 다시쓰기: 엄복과 화합본의 <마가복음> 번역텍스트 비교
Comparison of Lefevere’s Rewriting Theory-applied to the <Gospel of Mark> translated by Yan Fu and the Chinese Union Version
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Lefevere argued that it is difficult for translation text to perfectly reflect the original text as translation involves the process of asymmetric exchanges of different cultures. It is because translation is inevitably affected by ideology, poetics, and sponsors. That is why translators are engaged in ‘rewriting’ of the original text. According to Lefevere, ideology refers to a network of ideas accepted by a certain group of people in society at a certain period of time in history. Translators are inevitably under the influence of such ideas in their process of translating the originaltext. Sponsors, as spokesperson of ideology, also interfere in the process of translation through their power. The expert group, consisted of writers and translators, conducts their work through poetics skill within the boundary of ideology permitted by sponsors. The modern history of Chinese translation from 1840 to 1919 is the period that witnessed the proof of Lefevere’s translation theory. This paper applies Lefevere’s translation theory to the two modern Chinese translation versions of the Bible; <The Gospel of Mark> translated by Yan Fu and the Chinese Union Version.
Abstract
Lefevere argued that it is difficult for translation text to perfectly reflect the original text as translation involves the process of asymmetric exchanges of different cultures. It is because translation is inevitably affected by ideology, poetics, and sponsors. That is why translators are engaged in ‘rewriting’ of the original text. According to Lefevere, ideology refers to a network of ideas accepted by a certain group of people in society at a certain period of time in history. Translators are inevitably under the influence of such ideas in their process of translating the originaltext. Sponsors, as spokesperson of ideology, also interfere in the process of translation through their power. The expert group, consisted of writers and translators, conducts their work through poetics skill within the boundary of ideology permitted by sponsors. The modern history of Chinese translation from 1840 to 1919 is the period that witnessed the proof of Lefevere’s translation theory. This paper applies Lefevere’s translation theory to the two modern Chinese translation versions of the Bible; <The Gospel of Mark> translated by Yan Fu and the Chinese Union Version.
참고문헌 (31)
- 강미정, "근대 계몽기 한국에서의 중국 번역 서학서 수용 양상과 의의", 동악어문학, (71), pp.253~288 (2017), 동악어문학회[DOI]
- 김가희, "르페브르의 문학번역 제약 고찰 및 적용 －문학 번역 텍스트 비교 분석을 중심으로", 인문과학연구논총, 37(2), pp.215~236 (2016), 인문과학연구소[DOI]
- 임춘성, "중국 근현대문학사 담론과 타자화" (2013), 문학동네
- 장재일, "반영과 굴절의 경계: 『술라』(Sula)의 영한번역 비교연구", 영어권문화연구, 8(3), pp.203~230 (2015), 영어권문화연구소[DOI]
- 황지연, "중국어 성경 번역의 역사 —개신교 성경 번역본을 중심으로—", 중국학논총, (38), pp.65~89 (2012), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 황지연, "중국 근대 성경번역과 백화문의 맥락적 이해—和合本 번역을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 14(4), pp.225~246 (2013), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 趙維本, "譯經溯源-現代五大中文聖經翻譯史" (1993), 中國神學研究院
- 陈辉江, "马太效应", 基督教杂志, 10, pp.10~11 (2005)
- 陈 勤, "严复圣经翻译研究", 湘潮, 3, pp.12~16 (2014)
- 杜素鵑, "中國現代文學研究叢刊", 中國現代文學研究叢刊, 4, pp.29~32 (1997)
- 胡兴文, "中国语境下意识形态对翻译活动的操纵", 安徽理工大学学报, 9(2), pp.57~60 (2007)
- 李炽昌, "關於严复翻译的马可福音", 中华文史论丛, 64, pp.51~75 (2000)
- 林璋, "解读严复信达雅", 中国科技翻译, 13(4), pp.3~6 (2000)
- 劉麗霞, "官话和合本圣经的成功翻译及其对中国新文学的影响", 南京师范大学文学院学报, 3, pp.88~90 (2005)
- 卢芳芳, "从改写理论看严复翻译重点的不“信”", 长江大学学报, 34(4), pp.59~62 (2011)
- 鲁 赞, "马可福音两个译本前四章的描述性翻译研究", 21世纪理论实践探索, 7, pp.15~16 (2002)
- 任东升, "中国翻译家與圣经翻译", 四川外语学院学报, 4, pp.108~110 (2002)
- 任东升, "圣经翻译的文学化趋向", 解放军外国语学院学报, 26(2), pp.47~50 (2003)
- 任东升, "论严复的圣经片断翻译", 东方翻译, 2, pp.22~30 (2011)
- 任东升, "圣经汉译與信达雅", 翻译界, 2, pp.59~63 (2016)
- 史革新, "十九世纪六十至九十年代西学在中国的传播", 北京师范大学学报, 5, pp.15~18 (1985)
- 吴 莎，屠国元, "论中国近代翻译选材與意识形态的关系", 外语與外语教学, 11, pp.35~38 (2007)
- 譚樹林, "聖經二馬譯本关系辨析", 世界宗教研究, 1, pp.108~110 (2000)
- 譚樹林, "近代中文圣经翻译史上的二马译本", 烟台师范学院学报, 4, pp.84~88 (2003)
- 谢天振, "中西翻译史整体观探索", 东方翻译, 1, pp.4~10 (2010)
- 许泓婷, "从勒菲弗尔的操控论看圣经汉译本的翻译", 黑龙江史志, 19, pp.117~120 (2010)
- 颜方明, "严复與马礼逊的信达雅理论及圣经翻译对比研究", 外语與翻译, 1, pp.5~7 (2017)
- 戴玉群, "圣经的文体特征及翻译原则探析", 江苏科技大学学报, 15(3), pp.60~63 (2015)
- Loh, I., "An Encylopedia of Translation" (1995), The Chinese University Press
- Lefevere, A., "The Manuplation of Literature:Studies in Literary Translation" (1985), Routledge
- Lefevere, A., "Translation, Rewrting and the Manipulation of Literary Frame" (1992), Routledge