중국어성경에서 就의 한국어 번역 양상 -마가복음을 중심으로-
Translation of jiu in the Bible translation
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper studies how 就, a conjunctive marker, which forms cohesion in the Chinese source text was translated into Korean by comparing the Chinese Bible as a source text and its Korean translation. The result of the study demonstrates that 就 used in the Gospel of Mark was translated into a variety of Korean conjunctive markers. In particular, explicit conjunctive markers were found in many cases due to the characteristics of Korean language which heavily relies on conjunctive endings and conjunctions. Unlike Korean, Chinese is an ideographic language which does not use much of conjunction, therefore, translating Chinese into Korean tends to add conjunctions for clearer meaning. Of course, there were some non-explicit cases where 就 was not translated but such cases were limited. However, non-translation does not mean that the information that a text intends to convey or the content of a proposition was altered or lost. In Korean text, 就 was translated as temporal, additive, adversative and continuative conjunctions, most of which were additive.
Abstract
This paper studies how 就, a conjunctive marker, which forms cohesion in the Chinese source text was translated into Korean by comparing the Chinese Bible as a source text and its Korean translation. The result of the study demonstrates that 就 used in the Gospel of Mark was translated into a variety of Korean conjunctive markers. In particular, explicit conjunctive markers were found in many cases due to the characteristics of Korean language which heavily relies on conjunctive endings and conjunctions. Unlike Korean, Chinese is an ideographic language which does not use much of conjunction, therefore, translating Chinese into Korean tends to add conjunctions for clearer meaning. Of course, there were some non-explicit cases where 就 was not translated but such cases were limited. However, non-translation does not mean that the information that a text intends to convey or the content of a proposition was altered or lost. In Korean text, 就 was translated as temporal, additive, adversative and continuative conjunctions, most of which were additive.
참고문헌 (14)
- 김아영, "한-중 통번역에서의 중국어 무표지 연결 절의 관계의미 연구", 국제회의 통역과 번역, 6(1) (2004)
- 나은미, "텍스트의 내용과 접속 표지의 상관관계 연구", 우리어문연구, (27), pp.47~68 (2006), 우리어문학회
- 안인경, "텍스트의 관점에서 본 독한 동시통역에서의 관계문 문제", 텍스트언어학, 12, pp.183~212 (2002), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 원영희, "한글성경 번역상의 변화연구", 한국번역학회, 1(2) (2000)
- 이은희, "접속관계의 텍스트 언어학적 연구", 박사, pp.1993
- 연동숙, "한국어와 중국어의 텍스트 대조 결속 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 정정호, "개화기 개신교의 번역사역과 한국 어문의 근대화", 번역학연구, 8(2), pp.133~162 (2007), 한국번역학회
- 최태영, "성경번역이 어문생활에 미치는 영향", 종교연구, 4(1) (1988)
- Beaugrande, "담화텍스트 언어학 입문" (1991), 양영각
- Brinker, "텍스트언어학의 이해" (2004), 역락
- 廖秋仲, "廖秋仲文集" (1986), 北京语言文学院出版社
- "표준어번역성경"
- "합화본중국어성경"
- [URL]
