본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

법률번역에서 등가의 의미와 비교법적 분석사례 - ‘특수관계인’의 번역을 중심으로

Determining Equivalents in Legal Translation Based on Comparative Law Methodology: Focusing on teok-su-gwan-gye-in in Korean law

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

This article aims to provide a systematic model for determining equivalents in legal translation based on comparative law methodology. Because of the inherent incongruity of legal terms between different legal systems, legal translators need to search for functional equivalents in the target legal system that convey similar concepts with the source legal system, and determine the acceptability of such equivalents. By adopting Šarčević (1997), this article presents a methodology for measuring the degree of functional equivalence and reliable means of compensating for terminological incongruence and other alternative equivalents in the case of low acceptability of functional equivalents. In order to demonstrate the process of determining functional and other linguistic equivalents, this article analyzes the English translation of “특수관계인(teok-su-gwan-gye-in)”, one of the complicated legal terminology in Korean law. The findings show that only partial or non-equivalence exists between the Korean term and its functional equivalent candidates, which requires other linguistic equivalents such as literal equivalents and borrowing supported by clarification strategies.

Abstract

This article aims to provide a systematic model for determining equivalents in legal translation based on comparative law methodology. Because of the inherent incongruity of legal terms between different legal systems, legal translators need to search for functional equivalents in the target legal system that convey similar concepts with the source legal system, and determine the acceptability of such equivalents. By adopting Šarčević (1997), this article presents a methodology for measuring the degree of functional equivalence and reliable means of compensating for terminological incongruence and other alternative equivalents in the case of low acceptability of functional equivalents. In order to demonstrate the process of determining functional and other linguistic equivalents, this article analyzes the English translation of “특수관계인(teok-su-gwan-gye-in)”, one of the complicated legal terminology in Korean law. The findings show that only partial or non-equivalence exists between the Korean term and its functional equivalent candidates, which requires other linguistic equivalents such as literal equivalents and borrowing supported by clarification strategies.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 김도훈, "법률 문서 번역에 대한 소고", 번역학연구, 12(3), pp.7~31 (2011), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  2. 김보경, "한·중 법률용어 번역의 등가관계 : 사법공조분야 양자조약을 중심으로", 박사, 통번역학전공, pp.2013
  3. 김은경, "회사법상 특수관계인 규정에 관한 비교법적 고찰 -영미 회사법 규정과의 비교를 중심으로-", 法學論文集, 33(2), pp.185~210 (2009), 법학연구원
  4. 서정목, "법률번역에 있어서 전문용어의 번역에 관한 연구", 영어영문학, 18(2), pp.107~144 (2013), 미래영어영문학회
  5. 성승제, "기업법령상 특수관계인에 대한 개선 연구 : 「상법」과 「공정거래법」을 중심으로", 입법과 정책, 5(1), pp.115~147 (2013), 국회입법조사처[DOI]
  6. 세법상 특수관계인 범위의 문제점 및 개선방안, "정승영", KERI, 1~24, pp.KERI Insight. 14. 01 (2014)
  7. 규제합리화를 위한 특수관계인 관련 법령 정비 방안 (2009년도 법무부 연구용역 과제보고서), "한국기업법무협회", 법무부, ~ (2009)
  8. 특수관계인 관련 법령의 문제점 및 개선방안, "허원", 1~32, pp.KERI Insight. 19. 15 (2019)
  9. Bastarache, M., "The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law", pp.159~174 (2012), Oxford University Press
  10. Cao, D., "Translating Law" (2007), Multilingual Matters
  11. Cao, D., "Inter-lingual uncertainty in bilingual and multilingual law", Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp.69~83 (2007)
  12. Chesterman, A., "Memes of translation" (1997), John Benjamins
  13. De Groot, G. R., "The Dubious Quality of Legal Dictionaries", International Journal of Legal Information, 34(1), pp.65~86 (2006)
  14. Dorsey, T. A., "Legislative drafter's deskbook: a practical guide", TheCapitol.Net, ~ (2006)
  15. Engberg, J., "Legal Translation in Context", pp.9~26 (2013), Peter Lang
  16. García González, M., "A review of the concept of"functional equivalent"in translation : business entity types in Spain and in the United States", Perspectives, 25(3), pp.378~396 (2017)
  17. Jakobson, R., "On Translation", pp.232~239 (1966), Oxford University Press
  18. Janulevičienė, V., "Translation strategies of English legal terms in the bilingual Lithuanian and Norwegian law dictionaries", Socialinių mokslų studijos, 3(3), pp.1073~1093 (2011)
  19. Jopek-Bosiacka, A., "Comparative law and equivalence assessment of system-bound terms in EU legal translation. Linguistica Antverpiensia", New Series–Themes in Translation Studies, 12, pp.110~146 (2013)
  20. Leung, J. H., "The Ashgate Handbook of Legal Translation", pp.57~69 (2014), Ashgate
  21. Reiss, K., "Groundwork for a General Theory of Translation" (1984), Niemeyer
  22. Šarčević, S., "New Approach to Legal Translation" (1997), Kluwer Law International
  23. Šarčević, S., "The role of legal translation in legal harmonization", pp.83~107 (2012), Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
  24. Snell-Hornby, M., "Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach" (1988), John Benjamins
  25. Soriano-Barabino, G., "Comparative law for legal translators" (2016), Peter Lang
  26. Szemińska, W., "Helping the Translator Choose: The Concept of a Dictionary of Equivalents", Journal of Linguistics, 68(2), pp.355~363 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)