번역문학과 중국의 근대성 - 후스의 서구 단편소설 번역작품을 중심으로 (1915-1920)
The Translated Literature and Modernity in China: Hu Shi’s Translation of Western Short Stories During the New Cultural Movement Period (1915-1920)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on polysystem theory, the article explores translated literature’s power that brought in modernity during the New Cultural Movement period (1915-1920). Translated literature in the period occupied the literary polysystem’s center and stimulated new forms of literature. At that time, translated works functioned as tools and models to erect new forms of Chinese literature. Hu Shi’s translation of western short stories was the typical proof which incarnated modernity. Hu was the primary advocate for the literary revolution of the period, a movement which aimed to replace scholarly classical Chinese in writing with the vernacular spoken language, Baihua dialect, and to cultivate new forms of literature which allowed writers to express their thoughts and emotions with realities. Hu’s motivation to translate western short stories was to foster the literary revolution and translated works as his Hu Shi’s Translation of Foreign Short stories functioned as accelerators to generate the drastic change in literary language and literary view. Most writers in the period could express their own thoughts and emotions through the creation of new forms of literature, following the example of the translated works. This case study indicates that translated literature played an important role by bringing modernity to China’s literary system.
Abstract
Based on polysystem theory, the article explores translated literature’s power that brought in modernity during the New Cultural Movement period (1915-1920). Translated literature in the period occupied the literary polysystem’s center and stimulated new forms of literature. At that time, translated works functioned as tools and models to erect new forms of Chinese literature. Hu Shi’s translation of western short stories was the typical proof which incarnated modernity. Hu was the primary advocate for the literary revolution of the period, a movement which aimed to replace scholarly classical Chinese in writing with the vernacular spoken language, Baihua dialect, and to cultivate new forms of literature which allowed writers to express their thoughts and emotions with realities. Hu’s motivation to translate western short stories was to foster the literary revolution and translated works as his Hu Shi’s Translation of Foreign Short stories functioned as accelerators to generate the drastic change in literary language and literary view. Most writers in the period could express their own thoughts and emotions through the creation of new forms of literature, following the example of the translated works. This case study indicates that translated literature played an important role by bringing modernity to China’s literary system.
참고문헌 (41)
- 김상원, "중국의 문화변동과 현대문학" (2005), 학고방
- 김시준, "중국현대문학사" (2004), 지식산업사
- 김소정, "번역하는 중국－근대번역그룹의 탄생과 외국문학의 중국적 변용(1903~1937)－", 중국어문학, (60), pp.363~394 (2012), 영남중국어문학회[DOI]
- 胡適, "『신청년』의 신문학론" (2012), 한길사
- 김창규, "『新靑年』의 신문학운동과 중국의 근대성", 역사학연구, (59), pp.197~229 (2015), 호남사학회
- 백영서, "중국 현대사를 만든 세 가지 사건" (2021), 창비
- 신성곤, "한국인을 위한 중국사" (2019), 서해문집
- 안광복, "처음 읽는 서양철학사" (2017), 어크로스
- 양일모, "옌푸 : 중국의 근대성과 서양사상" (2008), 태학사
- 이강인, "중국현대문학 작가열전" (2014), 한국학술정보
- 이종민, "근대중국의 문학적 사유 읽기" (2004), 소명출판
- 이지영, "량치차오의 근대화 번역 기획 —정치소설 가인기우(佳人奇遇)와 모험소설 십오소호걸(十五小豪傑) 번역 실천(1898～1903)을 중심으로—", 통역과 번역, 23(3), pp.195~218 (2021), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 이현복, "胡適의 문학론에서 개인의 존재적 의미와 글쓰기", 중국현대문학, (60), pp.1~27 (2012), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 조관희, "조관희 교수의 중국현대사 강의" (2013), 궁리
- 최경옥, "번역과 일본의 근대" (2005), 살림
- 허도영, "5.4백화문운동의 세계관과 방법론의 의미", 현대중국연구, 13, pp.243~261 (2009)
- 홍석표, "중국의 근대적 문학의식의 탄생" (2007), 선학사
- 홍석표, "중국현대문학사" (2009), 이화여자대학교출판부
- Gentzler, E., "Contemporary Translation Theories" (1993), Routledge
- Pickowicz, P. G., "A hundred years later : Zouxueping’s documentaries and the legacies of China’s New Culture Movement", Journal of Chinese Cinemas, 10(2), pp.187~201 (2016)
- Venuti, L., "The Position of Literature within the Literature Polysystem", pp.199~204 (2004), Routledge
- 薄振杰, "翻譯與中國語言文學之現代轉型", 學海, pp.194~196 (2007)
- 曺文剛, "胡適的翻譯與白話文學", 語文學刊, (5), pp.55~56 (2015)
- 杜波, "「新靑年」與現代白話文運動", 廈門大學學報, (162), pp.98~101 (2004)
- 方英姿, "胡適短篇小說飜譯硏究", 黃山學院學報, 22(4), pp.63~64 (2020)
- 馮淑英, "儒家文以載道文學觀對古代小說總體構思的影響", 牧丹江敎育學院學報, (105), pp.25~27 (2007)
- 龔穎芬, "多元系統理論視角下的翻譯文學對淸末民初文學的重塑", 廣東石油化工學院學報, 23(2), pp.69~71 (2013)
- 胡適, "胡適譯短篇小說" (1987), 岳麓書社印行出版
- 賈春艶, "胡適的翻譯思想在白話文學和翻譯中的體現", 高敎硏究, (5), pp.265~266 (2016)
- 駱賢鳳, "叢目的論看中國近代外國文學飜譯中的民族文化心理", 民族文學硏究, pp.126~ (2006)
- 馬燕, "胡適文學理論的複雜性", 哈爾濱學院學報, 33(1), pp.58~61 (2012)
- 李琴, "中國飜譯文學與本土社會文化", 貴州社會科學, 234(6), pp.109~112 (2009)
- 李翔, "胡適短篇小說飜譯硏究", 碩士, pp.2010
- 唐愛軍, "五四時期中國飜譯文學成果探析", 蘭臺世界, pp.25~26 (2012)
- 王彬竹, "叢文化史角度對新靑年雜志文學飜譯的一点思考", 浙江傳媒學院學報, 23(2), pp.24~28 (2016)
- 王本朝, "文以載道觀的批判與新文學觀念的確立", 文學評論, (1), pp.124~127 (2010)
- 王本朝, "思想的優勝-新思潮與五四新文學", 湖北大學學報, 46(5), pp.48~51 (2019)
- 王曉丹, "飜譯史話", pp.89~91 (2012), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 張良博, "「新靑年」的翻譯活動: 多元體系論的解釋", 人文論壇, (57), pp.144~145 (2017)
- 張琴, "胡適的翻譯出版實踐活動與思想硏究", 學硏, (348), pp.85~87 (2019)
- 趙俊姝, "文學多元系統理論視角解讀胡適翻譯思想", 昆明學院學報, 29(3), pp.37~39 (2005)