日據時期韓國的世界文學觀念和中國新文學的位置
Perception of the World Literature and Position of Chinese New Literature in the Colonial Era of Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
By the early 20th century, Korea had to accept both colonial rule and invasion of Western civilization, which it had never experienced before. At the same time, modern literature in a true sense mainly written in Korean language appeared in Korea as well. At the same period in China, a completely different literature was born in form and content. The representative works of Chinese literature have been translated into Korean. However, Koreans’ perception and attitude toward Chinese literature was totally different from the time they had accepted classic Chinese literature. Noteworthy is the fact that the modern concept of ‘translation’ was first established in Korea at this time. This fact explains the increasing role of Han-gul (Korean alphabet), and at the same time this indicates that the East Asian-style ‘Republic of Letters’ which used to interact with each other through classic Chinese literature written in Chinese characters without translation had come to an end. Chinese literature, during this period, quickly became the text for others and became alienated from Korean readers. At that time, ‘World Literature’ flooded into the Korean Peninsula, and like any other East Asian country, which sparked a wide range of discussions, including urging to enlighten Korea’s literary circles of their own culture and have them explore Korea’s national literature. Translation, a new way of praticing literature, also reduced Chinese literature to the periphery of world literature. This paper aims to explore the aspects that appear in the early process of accepting and disseminating Chinese literature in Korea, focusing on records that are related to Korea’s acceptance and dissemination of Chinese literature. At the same time, this paper also explores the status change of Chinese literature within the recognition of World Literature in Korea.
Abstract
By the early 20th century, Korea had to accept both colonial rule and invasion of Western civilization, which it had never experienced before. At the same time, modern literature in a true sense mainly written in Korean language appeared in Korea as well. At the same period in China, a completely different literature was born in form and content. The representative works of Chinese literature have been translated into Korean. However, Koreans’ perception and attitude toward Chinese literature was totally different from the time they had accepted classic Chinese literature. Noteworthy is the fact that the modern concept of ‘translation’ was first established in Korea at this time. This fact explains the increasing role of Han-gul (Korean alphabet), and at the same time this indicates that the East Asian-style ‘Republic of Letters’ which used to interact with each other through classic Chinese literature written in Chinese characters without translation had come to an end. Chinese literature, during this period, quickly became the text for others and became alienated from Korean readers. At that time, ‘World Literature’ flooded into the Korean Peninsula, and like any other East Asian country, which sparked a wide range of discussions, including urging to enlighten Korea’s literary circles of their own culture and have them explore Korea’s national literature. Translation, a new way of praticing literature, also reduced Chinese literature to the periphery of world literature. This paper aims to explore the aspects that appear in the early process of accepting and disseminating Chinese literature in Korea, focusing on records that are related to Korea’s acceptance and dissemination of Chinese literature. At the same time, this paper also explores the status change of Chinese literature within the recognition of World Literature in Korea.
참고문헌 (35)
- 朴淑子, "俗物 敎養의 誕生 ― 名作이라는 殖民의 幽靈" (2012), 푸른 歷史
- 梁建植, "中國短篇小說集" (1929), 開闢社
- 牛林杰, "韓國 開化期文學과 梁啓超" (2002), 博而精出版社
- 鄭敏, "18世紀 韓中 知識人의 文藝共和國" (2014), 文學동네
- 洪昔杓, "近代 韓中 交流의 基源 : 文學과 思想 그리고 學問의 交涉" (2015), 梨花女大出版部
- 柄谷行人, "近代文學의 終言" (2006), 圖書出版b
- 孫立川, "日本硏究中國現當代文學論著索引 1919~1989" (1991), 北京大學出版社
- 김동식, "민족개조와 감정의 진화: 1920년대 이광수 문학론에 대한 예비적 고찰", 한국학연구, (29), pp.29~54 (2013), 한국학연구소
- 김복순, "식민지 문학의 전유와 근대문학 상상의 인식장치 - 식민지 시기 인도문학을 중심으로", 여성문학연구, (33), pp.225~268 (2014), 한국여성문학학회
- 金瑞恩, "胡適在韓國九十年", 現代中文學刊, (6) (2011), 華東師範大學
- 박숙자, "로컬리티의 재구성 : 조선", 문학, 한국문학이론과 비평, pp.2012, 16(3)[DOI]
- 박진영, "한국 근대 번역문학사 성립의 기원과 역사성", 탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities, 7(2), pp.5~38 (2014), 이화인문과학원[DOI]
- 박진영, "중국 근대문학 번역의 계보와 역사적 성격", 민족문학사연구, (55), pp.121~152 (2014), 민족문학사연구소
- 서은주, "1930년대 외국문학 수용의 좌표", 민족문학사연구, (28), pp.41~68 (2005), 민족문학사연구소
- 이시활, "일제강점기 한국 작가들의 중국 현대문학 바라보기와 수용양상 -梁建植, 李東谷, 梁明을 중심으로-", 중국학, (33), pp.433~472 (2009), 대한중국학회
- 이희정, "1910년대 『매일신보』 번안·번역 소설의 전개양상 - 식민담론과 영향관계를 중심으로", 한국현대문학연구, (19), pp.119~160 (2006), 한국현대문학회
- 장동천, "日據末期韓國期刊登載中國現代文學韓語譯文的背景及特點─以≪三千里≫月刊爲中心", 중국어문논총, (43), pp.547~565 (2009), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 洪尙勳, "梁建植의 三國演義 翻譯에 對하여", 韓國學硏究, 14 (2005), 仁河大學韓國學硏究所
- "開闢, 第5~8號", 開闢社, ~ (1920)
- "開闢, 第30號", 開闢社, ~ (1922)
- "開闢, 第38號", 開闢社, ~ (1923)
- "東明, 第37~40號", 東明社, ~ (1923)
- "靑春" (1918), 新文館
- 姜珍浩, "韓國의 文學全集 現況과 問題點", 月刊 文化藝術 (2002), 韓國文化藝術振興院
- 薛義植, "眞書와 原書", 三千里, (1) (1929), 三千里社
- 李光洙, "文學이란 何오", 每日新報, ~ (1916)
- 梁建植, "支那의 小說 及 戱曲에 就하여", 每日新報, ~ (1917)
- 梁建植, "反新文學의 出版物이 流行하는 中國文壇의 奇現象", 開闢, (44) (1924)
- 이승원(Lee Seungwon), "「靑春」靑年들에게 文學을 勸하다", 오늘의 도서관(今日的圖書館), 210 (2013), 國立中央圖書館數碼圖書館
- 作者未詳, "中國의 思想革命과 文學革命", 東亞日報, ~ (1922)
- 丁來東, "「阿Q正傳」을 읽고", 朝鮮日報, ~ (1930)
- 丁來東, "中國 新詩壇의 彗星「徐志摩」를 弔함", 東亞日報, ~ (1931)
- 정선태(Jeong Seontae), "翻譯으로 만난 近代 — 魯迅≪狂人日記≫", 韓民族日報(한겨레신문), ~ (2003)
- 天台山人(金台俊), "文學革命後의 中國文藝觀 — 過去四十年間", 東亞日報, ~ (1930)
- "韓國史 Database"[URL]
