본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영한 순차통역 학생 자기평가와 교수자 평가 비교 연구

Self-Assessment vs. Instructor Assessment in English-Korean Consecutive Interpreting: A Preliminary Study on Improving Self-Assessment Accuracy in Fourth-Year Undergraduate Students

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

This preliminary study is the first in a series of studies aimed at improving the self-assessment of undergraduate translation and interpreting students. Self-assessment is crucial to developing self-directed learning skills and enabling formative assessment - key components of lifelong learning competence. The study looks at the consecutive interpreting performance of two cohorts: eight students (4-5 sessions) from Autumn 2023 and six students (3-4 sessions) from Spring 2024. The accuracy of the students' self-assessments was compared with the teachers' assessments. Three key findings emerged: i) the correlation between student self-assessments and instructor ratings increased progressively from week 1 to week 4; ii) high-performing students' self-assessments were more closely aligned with instructor ratings; and iii) the greatest agreement between student and instructor ratings occurred when rating accuracy. This initial study sets the stage for future research to develop better teaching methods for self-assessment in translation and interpreting education. The findings suggest several implications for teaching, which are discussed along with plans for longer-term research.

Abstract

This preliminary study is the first in a series of studies aimed at improving the self-assessment of undergraduate translation and interpreting students. Self-assessment is crucial to developing self-directed learning skills and enabling formative assessment - key components of lifelong learning competence. The study looks at the consecutive interpreting performance of two cohorts: eight students (4-5 sessions) from Autumn 2023 and six students (3-4 sessions) from Spring 2024. The accuracy of the students' self-assessments was compared with the teachers' assessments. Three key findings emerged: i) the correlation between student self-assessments and instructor ratings increased progressively from week 1 to week 4; ii) high-performing students' self-assessments were more closely aligned with instructor ratings; and iii) the greatest agreement between student and instructor ratings occurred when rating accuracy. This initial study sets the stage for future research to develop better teaching methods for self-assessment in translation and interpreting education. The findings suggest several implications for teaching, which are discussed along with plans for longer-term research.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 남원준, "맞춤형 피드백의 가능성 탐구-학생별 ‘문지방 개념’ 발견을 위한노력", 통번역학연구, 27(1), pp.49~83 (2023)
  2. 박헌일, "전문 통번역사의 통역품질 평가 연구 : 인식도 조사와 평가수행 결과를 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 21(2), pp.55~86 (2019)
  3. 신나정, "자기주도적 통역학습방법으로서 자기평가의 교육적 효과에 대한실행연구", 통번역학연구, 21(3), pp.79~107 (2017)
  4. 우경조, "통역전공 학생들의 자기평가 분석", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 21(9), pp.667~682 (2021)
  5. 이미경, "순차통역 교육에서 자기평가의 효용성에 대한 소고 : 학부과정에서의 통역교육 사례를 중심으로", 통번역교육연구, 15(3), pp.57~82 (2017)
  6. 이지은, "평가 척도를 이용한 사법통역 평가 사례연구", 번역학연구, 20(2), pp.81~109 (2019)
  7. 이지은, "영한 순차통역 수업의 교수자 수정 피드백에 대한 담화분석적 연구", 통역과 번역, 23(3), pp.219~244 (2021)
  8. 임세인, "통번역대학원 학생의 자기평가능력에 관한 사례연구", 번역학연구, 21(3), pp.211~233 (2020)
  9. 임순정, "CRIPD 분석을 통한 통역 학습 자가평가 도구의 제안 : AB 순차통역 체크리스트", 프랑스어문교육, (64), pp.63~89 (2019)
  10. Angelelli, C.V., "Testing and assessment in translation and interpreting studies", pp.13~47 (2009), John Benjamins
  11. Araújo, L. D., "Feedback in conference interpreter education : Perspectives of trainers and trainees", Interpreting, 21(1), pp.135~150 (2019)
  12. Bale, R., "Undergraduate consecutive interpreting and lexical knowledge : The role of spoken corpora", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 7(1), pp.27~50 (2013)
  13. Fowler, Y., "Critical link 4 : Professionalisation of interpreting in the community", pp.253~262 (2007), John Benjamins
  14. Galán-Mañas, A., "Competence assessment procedures in translator training", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 9(1), pp.63~82 (2015)
  15. Han, C., "Using self-assessment as a formative assessment tool in an English-Chinese interpreting course : Student views and perceptions of its utility", Perspectives : Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 28(1), pp.109~125 (2020)
  16. Han, C., "The accuracy of student self-assessments of English-Chinese bidirectional interpretation : A longitudinal quantitative study", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), pp.386~398 (2018)
  17. Koo, T. K., "A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research", Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), pp.155~163 (2016)
  18. Lee, J., "Comparing student self-assessment and teacher assessment in Korean-English consecutive interpreting : Focus on fidelity and language", INContext : Studies in Translation and Interculturalism, 2(3), pp.58~83 (2022)
  19. Lee, Y. -H., "Self-assessment as an autonomous learning tool in an interpretation classroom", Meta, 50(4), pp.7202~ (2005)[DOI]
  20. Lee, Y. -H., "Comparing self-assessment and teacher’s assessment in interpreter training", T&I Review, 1, pp.87~111 (2011)
  21. Li, X., "Self-assessment as ‘assessment as learning’ in translator and interpreter education : Validity and washback", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 12(1), pp.48~67 (2018)
  22. Postigo Pinazo, E., "Self-assessment in teaching interpreting", TTR, 21(1), pp.173~209 (2008)
  23. Su, W., "Interpreting quality as evaluated by peer students", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 13(2), pp.177~189 (2019)
  24. Su, W., "Understanding rubric use in peer assessment of translation", Perspectives : Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 30(1), pp.71~85 (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)