본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한일 AB통역 수업 및 평가에 관한 일 고찰 - 순차통역 입문과정 수업의 분석을 통하여

A Study on Korean into Japanese (A-B) Consecutive Interpretation Assessment for Introductory Course Students

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

The purpose of this study is to set and apply assessment standards for A to B interpretation with focus on the ability to interpret into language B and analyze the results. By posing questions on the difficulties that students experienced in A to B interpretation and on their educational background, it was found that most of the students learned language B after their childhood and felt lack of dominance in language B themselves. Also analyzed were the difference between things that professors pointed out as their weaknesses and those which students themselves considered to be their problems based on self-assessments of transcription of their recorded interpretation. On these grounds, the assessment criteria were identified, divided into 'Interpretation Assessment'(accuracy,fluency) and 'Language B Assessment'(expression, pronunciation)and given with weights as proposed by precedent studies on survey analysis of interpreter and language user expectations, as well as by student-defined score per category. The paper analyzed the correlation between the total score and the score of each category marked according to these standards through a Wilcoxon signed rank test, and studied principal component analysis results of the difference between students' midterm and final exam performance. It also discusses the issues and problems that were found in applying the assessment standards. This study aims to help students improve skills by helping them realize the categories for which they should practice further by presenting objective data through statistical analysis.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to set and apply assessment standards for A to B interpretation with focus on the ability to interpret into language B and analyze the results. By posing questions on the difficulties that students experienced in A to B interpretation and on their educational background, it was found that most of the students learned language B after their childhood and felt lack of dominance in language B themselves. Also analyzed were the difference between things that professors pointed out as their weaknesses and those which students themselves considered to be their problems based on self-assessments of transcription of their recorded interpretation. On these grounds, the assessment criteria were identified, divided into 'Interpretation Assessment'(accuracy,fluency) and 'Language B Assessment'(expression, pronunciation)and given with weights as proposed by precedent studies on survey analysis of interpreter and language user expectations, as well as by student-defined score per category. The paper analyzed the correlation between the total score and the score of each category marked according to these standards through a Wilcoxon signed rank test, and studied principal component analysis results of the difference between students' midterm and final exam performance. It also discusses the issues and problems that were found in applying the assessment standards. This study aims to help students improve skills by helping them realize the categories for which they should practice further by presenting objective data through statistical analysis.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 길영숙, "통역사에게 요구되는 언어능력에 관한 고찰", 통번역학연구, 10(1), pp.17~28 (2006), 통번역연구소
  2. 김한식, "한일 통역 및 번역강의에 대한 연구조사-통역번역대학원 재학생 및 교강사 대상 설문조사 결과를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 6, pp.21~51 (2002)
  3. 김한식, "한일 통역과 번역" (2003), 한국문화사
  4. 김한식, "통번역 강의 진행에 관한 의식조사–통번역의 텍스트 및 피드백에 관한 설문을 중심으로", 23, pp.13~29 (2008), 동일어문학회
  5. 김한식, "일본어 중상급자의 악센트 청취・발화 능력 분석 -한일통역연습 사이버강의를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 13(2), pp.65~80 (2010), 통번역연구소
  6. 김혜원, "통역사의 음성이 통역의 질에 미치는 영향 고찰 - 한-일 통역을 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 11(1), pp.17~30 (2007), 통번역연구소
  7. 서의훈, "SPSS 18.0을 이용한 통계분석" (2010), 자유아카데미
  8. 성초림, "번역 교육 현장에서의 번역물 품질 평가-한국외대 통번역대학원 교강사 설문을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 2(2), pp.37~56 (2001)
  9. 이은용, "한일간 통역에 있어서 B언어평가에 대한 방법론적 검토-OPI 평가 기준의 응용가능성", 日本語文學, 1(35), pp.305~320 (2007), 한국일본어문학회
  10. 편혜원, "교사 프로파일에 따른 AB 통역 평가에 관한 연구", 통역과 번역, 6(2), pp.207~224 (2004), 한국통역번역학회
  11. Chiaro, D., "Interpreter's Perception of Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Factors Affecting Quality: A Survey through the World Wide Web", Meta, 49(2), pp.278~293 (2004)
  12. 최정윤, "Proposing a Performance Assessment Tool for Consecutive Interpretation", 통역과 번역, 7(2), pp.195~216 (2005), 한국통역번역학회
  13. Choi. J. Y., "Metacognitive Evaluation Method in Consecutive Interpretation for Novice Learners", Meta, 5(1), pp.273~283 (2006)
  14. Gabrielson, P. S., "Consecutive Interpreting:An Instructor’s Manual, Program in Translation and intepreting" (2008), College of Continuing education, university of minnesota
  15. Gile, D., "Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training(Rev. ed.)" (2009), John Benjamins
  16. Hatim, B., "The Translator as Communicatior" (1997), Routledge
  17. Kelly, D., "A Handbook for translator trainers" (2005), St. Jerome
  18. Kornakov, P., "Five Principles and Five Skills for Training Interpreters", Meta, 45(2), pp.272~287 (2000)
  19. Kurz, I., "Conference Interpreting: Quality in the Ears of the user", Meta, 46(2), pp.394~409 (2001)
  20. Lee, Y. H., "Comparing Self-assessment and Teacher's Assessment in Interpreter Training", T&I REVIEW, 1, pp.87~111 (2011)
  21. Sawyer, D. B., "The Integration of Curriculum and Assessment in interpreter Education: A Case Study", 박사, pp.2001
  22. NHK, "NHK日本語発音アクセント辞典" (1998), NHK放送文化研究所
  23. 酒井 裕, "音声アクセントクリニック" (1992), にほんごの凡人社
  24. 戸田貴子, "日本語教育と音声" (2008), くろしお出版

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)