Comparing Self-assessment and Teacher’s Assessment in Interpreter Training
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Despite the importance of assessment in learning, students are often left out of the assessment process. Self-assessment may be the starting point for students to get involved in the assessment process. This study examined the characteristics of both student and teacher assessments of students’ interpretation performances. The study population consisted of teachers and students of a Korean-English program at a two-year graduate school of translation and interpretation. The study asked two questions: (1) Are interpreting students able to produce self-assessments that are similar in grade and content to teachers’ assessments? (2) What are the characteristics of student self-assessments when compared to teacher assessments? The study found that although the students’ self-assigned grades were similar to those of the teachers, the student self-assessments were not similar in content to the teacher assessments. The study also found that student self-assessments had distinct characteristics which could be complementary to teachers’ assessments.
Abstract
Despite the importance of assessment in learning, students are often left out of the assessment process. Self-assessment may be the starting point for students to get involved in the assessment process. This study examined the characteristics of both student and teacher assessments of students’ interpretation performances. The study population consisted of teachers and students of a Korean-English program at a two-year graduate school of translation and interpretation. The study asked two questions: (1) Are interpreting students able to produce self-assessments that are similar in grade and content to teachers’ assessments? (2) What are the characteristics of student self-assessments when compared to teacher assessments? The study found that although the students’ self-assigned grades were similar to those of the teachers, the student self-assessments were not similar in content to the teacher assessments. The study also found that student self-assessments had distinct characteristics which could be complementary to teachers’ assessments.
참고문헌 (32)
- Afflerbach, P., "Metacognition inLiteracy Learning", pp.141~164 (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Al‒Hamly, M., "Assessment in the Arab World", pp.291~305 (2005), TESOL Arabia
- Bachman, L. F., "Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing" (1990), Oxford University Press
- Bachman, L. F., "The construct validation of self–rating of communicative language ability", Language Testing, 6(1), pp.14~25 (1989)
- Self–assessment of foreign language skills: Does it work?, "Blue, G.", CLE, 296~569, pp.CLE Working Papers. 3 (1994)
- Choi, J‒Y., "A metacognitive approach to evaluating consecutive interpretation for novice learners", Korean Society of Conference Interpretation, 6(1), pp.169~185 (2004)
- Davidson F., "A self–rating scale of English difficulty: Rasch scalar analysis", Language Testing, 2, pp.164~179 (1985)
- Dickenson, L., "Self–instruction in Language Learning" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Fellenz, R. A., "Materials and Methods in Continuing Education", pp.256~262 (1976), Klevens Publications
- Fox, M. F., "Developing Translation Competence" (2000), John Benjamins
- Gile, D., "Bridging the Gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation", pp.39~56 (1994), John Benjamins
- Gile, D., "Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training" (1995), John Benjamins
- Kiraly, D., "Cognitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting", pp.137~160 (1997), Sage
- Kiraly, D., "A Social Constructivist Approach to Translator Education: Empowerment from theory to practice" (2000), St. Jerome Publishing
- Harris, D., "Evaluating and Assessing for Learning" (1994), Nichols Publishing
- Hatim, B., "Translator as Communicator" (1997), Routledge
- Leblanc, R., "Self–assessment as a second language placement instrument", TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), pp.673~305 (1985)
- Lee-Jahnke, H., "Aspects pedagogiques de l’evaluation en traduction", Meta, 46(2), pp.259~267 (2001)
- Lee, Y. H., "Self-assessment as an autonomous learning tool in an interpretation classroom", Meta, 50(4) (2003)
- Lewkowicz, J. A., "Evaluation: A way of involving learners", Evaluation, 6, pp.45~80 (1985)
- Ornstein, A., "Curriculum: Foundations, principles and issues" (1998), Allyn and Bacon
- Oskarsson, M., "Approaches to Self–assessment in Foreign Language Learning" (1978), Council of Europe
- Oskarsson, M., "Self–assessment of language proficiency: Rationale and applications", Language Testing, 6(1), pp.1~13 (1989)
- Pierce, B. N., "Self–assessment, French immersion and locus of control", Applied Linguistics, 14(1), pp.25~42 (1993)
- Raasch, A., "Selbsteinschätzungstests für den Lerner: eine Hilfe fur den Franzosisschlehrer" (1979), Zielsprache Franzoesisch
- Russo, M., "Testing aptitude for simultaneous interpretation: Evaluation of the First Trial and Preliminary Results", Interpreter’s Newsletter, 5, pp.68~71 (1993)
- Russo, M., "Self–evaluation: the awareness of one’s own difficulties as a training tool for simultaneous interpretation", Interpreter’s Newsletter, 6, pp.75~84 (1995)
- Shrauger, J. S., "The relative accuracy of self–prediction and judgments by others in psychological assessment", Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), pp.322~351 (1981)
- van Passel, F., "L’enseignement des Langues aux Adultes" (1974), Nathan
- Test of Swedish as a second language: An experiment in self–assessment, "von Elek, T.", University of Goeteborgs, ~, pp.Work papers from the Language Teaching Research Center 31 (1982)
- von Elek, T., "New Directions in Language Testing", pp.47~57 (1985), Oxford University Press
- Weiss, C. H., "Evaluating Action Programs: Readings In social action and education" (1972), Allyn and Bacon