申欽의 散文과 前後七子

Abstract

The purpose of this paper consider Shin Hum(申欽1566~1628)’s recognition on prose and its character. He was treated a man of representative author in the mid-Choson because what a man calls ‘four great authors in chinese literature(漢文四大家)’. But in reality this four great authors occupied every individual realms. In Kim Chang-Hyup(金昌協)’s phrase, Shin’s prose which the “bring it into line with old style writings” is in striking contrast with Lee Jeong-Gu(李廷龜)’s prose which the “have a description his own way”, because It is caused by Shin idolized Ming’s restorative authors who had an effect on Choson’s literary circles. However, He realized his inimitable writings by various methods like as Yoon Geun-Soo(尹根壽), Choi Rip(崔岦), Ryu Mong-In(柳夢寅), and Hur Kyun(許筠)’s case. Shin Hum composed the Ko-Ac-Bu(古樂府) and Hu-Ship-Gu-Soo(後十九首) follow Li Pan-Long(李攀龍), compiled he’s collection for reference a collection of He Jing-Ming(何景明)’s works, perused Wang Shi-Zhen(王世貞)’s Ye-Won-Chi-Un(藝苑卮言). There were no denying the fact. But, on the one hand Shin Hum distrusted Wang’s review on the Yang Shen(楊愼), positively vindicated Song period poetry and zhu Xi(朱熹)’s literature. As well as, Shin Hum had confidence that Song Lian(宋濂), Fang Xiao-Ru(方孝孺), Zhang Shi(張適)’s writings and then Wang Shou-Ren(王守仁), Luo Lun(羅倫), Xue Xuan(薛瑄), Chen Xian-Zhang(陳獻章)’s scholarly attainments were admirable. This is to certify that Shin Hum possessed independent and pontaneousnesss literary attitude, was not restricted in the Ming’s restorative school. His attitude like this was reflected intact in his article. By using ellipsis, inversion and partition with friquent, he formed unique literary world that keep his distance from the Ming’s restorative style and Tang-Song’s general style.