고려 금속공예에 보이는 遼文化의 영향
The Influence of Liao Dynasty Culture on Goryeo Dynasty Metal Craft
0
조회
0
다운로드
20
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After it established a peaceful relationship with the Khitans, Goryeo became politically and socially a stable place, and between the 11th and 12th century during the rule of King Munjong and King Injong, it gave birth to an elegant and unique craft culture that was both naturalistic and ornamental. The metal craft of this period shows the highest level of aesthetic craftsmanship with the finest techniques in the history of Korean metal craft, possessing form, practicality, and ornamentality. At the root were the sculpting skills and aesthetic sensibilities of Goryeo people but the official exchanges between Goryeo and the Khitan Empire that were carried out in the 11th century and the inflow and acceptance of the northern culture through the naturalization policy of the Khitans were also important factors. For about 50 years starting from the rule of King Hyeonjong in the 11th century, Goryeo had official exchanges with Khitan and, in formal envoy dispatches, court costumes and silverware made by master government artisans with the highest level of craftsmanship were given and received. There were most likely exchanges of basic craft forms and techniques as well. Khitans, nomads that moved along areas with hunting, fishing, and aquatic plants, inherited the Tang Dynasty culture of the Hebei, Shanxi, and Liaoning areas, assimilated the Han Dynasty culture and, adding its own unique basic forms and techniques into the mix, established the 10th and 11th century north grassland culture. Goryeo craft could advance further because some of the Khitan artisans with considerable level of craftsmanship including metallurgy skills became naturalized and worked as government artisans in Goryeo. Metal craft in Goryeo shows elements of Liao Dynasty culture in the formal aspects of its Buddhist craft, such as Kundika (淨甁), and of its general artworks, such as twin dragon mirrors and encased ornamental knives. The most noticeable elements are the patterns: Buddhist patterns, such as double dragon, taegeukhwayeombojumun (太極火焰寶珠文) and poryusugeummun (蒲柳水禽文: water, willow and waterfowl), and general patterns, such as peoniesand bamboos. In technical aspects, the dense ring-matting technique using multiple chisels (多重釘) is the basic layer and, for main patterns, the high volume repoussé (打出技法) is the representational technique, and these achieved their peak during this period by adding the Khitan techniques to the foundation of the craft tradition from the Unified Silla Period. This paper analyzed from various angles the elements of Liao Dynasty culture that are reflected in the 11th and 12th century craftsmanship, in which we can see the quintessence of Korean metal craft, and investigated their influence on Goryeo craft and their significance in terms of history of craft relations.
Abstract
After it established a peaceful relationship with the Khitans, Goryeo became politically and socially a stable place, and between the 11th and 12th century during the rule of King Munjong and King Injong, it gave birth to an elegant and unique craft culture that was both naturalistic and ornamental. The metal craft of this period shows the highest level of aesthetic craftsmanship with the finest techniques in the history of Korean metal craft, possessing form, practicality, and ornamentality. At the root were the sculpting skills and aesthetic sensibilities of Goryeo people but the official exchanges between Goryeo and the Khitan Empire that were carried out in the 11th century and the inflow and acceptance of the northern culture through the naturalization policy of the Khitans were also important factors. For about 50 years starting from the rule of King Hyeonjong in the 11th century, Goryeo had official exchanges with Khitan and, in formal envoy dispatches, court costumes and silverware made by master government artisans with the highest level of craftsmanship were given and received. There were most likely exchanges of basic craft forms and techniques as well. Khitans, nomads that moved along areas with hunting, fishing, and aquatic plants, inherited the Tang Dynasty culture of the Hebei, Shanxi, and Liaoning areas, assimilated the Han Dynasty culture and, adding its own unique basic forms and techniques into the mix, established the 10th and 11th century north grassland culture. Goryeo craft could advance further because some of the Khitan artisans with considerable level of craftsmanship including metallurgy skills became naturalized and worked as government artisans in Goryeo. Metal craft in Goryeo shows elements of Liao Dynasty culture in the formal aspects of its Buddhist craft, such as Kundika (淨甁), and of its general artworks, such as twin dragon mirrors and encased ornamental knives. The most noticeable elements are the patterns: Buddhist patterns, such as double dragon, taegeukhwayeombojumun (太極火焰寶珠文) and poryusugeummun (蒲柳水禽文: water, willow and waterfowl), and general patterns, such as peoniesand bamboos. In technical aspects, the dense ring-matting technique using multiple chisels (多重釘) is the basic layer and, for main patterns, the high volume repoussé (打出技法) is the representational technique, and these achieved their peak during this period by adding the Khitan techniques to the foundation of the craft tradition from the Unified Silla Period. This paper analyzed from various angles the elements of Liao Dynasty culture that are reflected in the 11th and 12th century craftsmanship, in which we can see the quintessence of Korean metal craft, and investigated their influence on Goryeo craft and their significance in terms of history of craft relations.
참고문헌 (40)
- "高麗圖經", ~
- "高麗史", ~
- "遼史", ~
- "朝鮮古蹟圖譜", ~
- 김수연, "고려시대 佛頂道場 연구", 이화사학연구, (38), pp.1~32 (2009), 이화사학연구소
- 김위현, "遼金史硏究" (1985), 裕豊出版社
- 김은애, "고려시대 타출공예품 연구", 석사, pp.2003
- 紀兵, "佛敎遺宝" (2005), 遼寧人民出版社
- 內蒙古文物考古硏究所, "內蒙古赤峰寶山遼壁畵墓發掘簡報" (1998), 文物
- 內蒙古自治州文物考古硏究所, "遼陳國公主墓" (1993), 문물출판사
- 孟古托力, "遼代人口的若干問題探討" (1997), 北方文物
- 박옥걸, "高麗時代의 歸化人 硏究" (1996), 國學資料院
- 배진달, "羅末麗初 金銅線刻涅槃變相板 연구", 丹豪文化硏究, (3) (1998)
- 山西省古建築保護硏究所, "朔州崇福寺" (1996), 文物出版社
- 山西雲崗石窟文物保管所, "華嚴寺" (1980), 文物出版社
- 上海博物館, "草原瑰寶" (2000), 上海書畵出版社
- 宿白, "定州工藝與靜志, 淨衆兩塔地宮文物" (1997), 文物
- 안귀숙, "高麗時代 金屬工藝의 對中交涉. in : 高麗 美術의 對外交涉" (2004), 예경출판사
- "敖漢文物精華" (2004), 내몽고문화출판사
- 王健群, "庫倫遼代壁畵墓" (1989), 文物出版社
- 王月涏, "遼朝皇帝的崇佛及其社會影响. in : 中國古代史(二)" (1994), 中國人民大學書報資料中心
- 于建設, "赤峰金銀器" (2006), 遠方出版社
- 劉海文, "宣化下八里Ⅱ區遼壁畵墓考古發掘報告" (2008), 文物出版社
- 李宇峰, "彰武朝陽區遼代墓地. in : 遼寧考古文集" (2003), 遼寧民族出版社
- 任士民, "靑瓷與越窯" (1999), 上海古籍出版社
- 張國慶, "遼代契丹習俗史" (1997), 遼寧民族出版社
- 蔣金玲, "遼代渤海移民的治理和歸屬硏究", 석사, pp.2004
- 浙江省文物考古硏究所, "寺龍口越窯址" (2002), 文物出版社
- 浙江省博物館, "浙江紀年瓷" (2000), 文物出版社
- 鄭紹宗, "遼代繪畵藝術和遼墓壁畵的發現與硏究" (1995), 文物春秋
- 趙雅莉, "耀瓷歷代蓮紋裝飾. in : 中國耀州窯國際學術討論會文集" (2005), 三秦出版社
- 朝陽北塔考古勘察隊, "遼寧朝陽北塔天宮地宮淸理簡報" (1992), 文物
- 陳文彦, "遼都神韻" (2003), 내몽고인민출판사
- 天津市歷史博物館考古隊, "天津薊縣獨樂寺塔", 考古學報 (1999)
- 河北省文物考古硏究所, "宣化遼墓壁畵" (2001), 文物出版社
- 河北省文物硏究所, "宣化遼墓" (2001), 文物出版社
- 韓光輝, "遼代中國北方人口的遷移及其社會影響", 北方文物 (1989)
- 香取正彦, "金工の傳統技法" (1986), 理學社
- 許曉東, "佛敎對遼代工藝的影响", 故宮博物院院刊, 94 (2001)
- 홍희유, "조선중세수공업사연구" (1989), 지양사
