벨디브(Vél' d'Hiv)의 기념: 비시, 공화국, 프랑스(1992-1995)
Commemorating the Vel d'Hiv: Vichy, Republic and France(1992-1995)
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The ‘Vel d'Hiv debate’(1992-95) was not on the nature of mass roundup in the Vel d'Hiv on 16-17 July 1942, but about the issue of the official recognition of the responsibility for the anti-Semitic persecutions by the Vichy regime. While a group in the debate insisted that the existing state authority recognized its responsibility for the crime committed half a century ago, the others opposed the insistence. The former insisted the historical continuity between the Vichy regime and the republic, but the others who denied the idea claimed that accepting this continuity was, as it were, a great insult to de Gaulle and the French resistance. While the first group resented President Mitterrand's silence in 1992 and welcomed President Chirac's apology for the French past in 1995, the others insisted that neither France nor the republic was guilty. This debate resulted in a national commemoration day with a longer lasting legacy. In spite of the shortcomings related to its name that obscured who committed the anti-Semitic crime, the establishment of the commemoration day should be appreciated, because the day reminded the French of their national shame while breaking the tradition of commemorating their past glory.
Abstract
The ‘Vel d'Hiv debate’(1992-95) was not on the nature of mass roundup in the Vel d'Hiv on 16-17 July 1942, but about the issue of the official recognition of the responsibility for the anti-Semitic persecutions by the Vichy regime. While a group in the debate insisted that the existing state authority recognized its responsibility for the crime committed half a century ago, the others opposed the insistence. The former insisted the historical continuity between the Vichy regime and the republic, but the others who denied the idea claimed that accepting this continuity was, as it were, a great insult to de Gaulle and the French resistance. While the first group resented President Mitterrand's silence in 1992 and welcomed President Chirac's apology for the French past in 1995, the others insisted that neither France nor the republic was guilty. This debate resulted in a national commemoration day with a longer lasting legacy. In spite of the shortcomings related to its name that obscured who committed the anti-Semitic crime, the establishment of the commemoration day should be appreciated, because the day reminded the French of their national shame while breaking the tradition of commemorating their past glory.
참고문헌 (20)
- "L'Événement du Jeudi", ~
- "L'Express", ~
- "Le Figaro", ~
- "L'Humanité", ~
- "Le Monde", ~
- "Le Nouvel Observateur", ~
- "Le Quotidien de Paris", ~
- "Libération", ~
- Azéma, Jean-Pierre., "Vichy aussi, c'est la France", L'Histoire, 331 (2008)
- Barcellini, Serge., "Sur deux journées nationales commémorant la déportation et les persécutions des ‘Années noires", Vingtième Siècle. Revue d'histoire, 45 (1995)
- Bédarida, François, "Touvier, Vichy et le crime contre l'humanité" (1996), Seuil
- Carrier, Peter., "The Origins and Political Function of the Vél' d'hiv' in Paris and the Holocaust Monument" (2005), Berghahn Books
- Clifford, Rebecca., "Commemorating the Holocaust. The Dilemmas of Remembrance in France and Italy" (2013), Oxford University Press
- Conan, Éric, "Vichy, un passé qui ne passe pas" (1996), Gallimard
- Loubes, Olivier., "La France est-elle responsable des crimes de Vichy?", L'Histoire, 387 (2013)
- Rajsfus, Maurice, "La Rafle du Vel d'Hiv" (2002), PUF
- Wieviorka, Annette., "1992. Réflexions sur une commémoration", Annales ESC, 48(3) (1993)
- Wieviorka, Annette, "Travail de mémoire 1914-1998" (1999), Éditions Autrement
- 이용우, "프랑스의 과거사 청산 - 숙청과 기억의 역사, 1944-2004" (2008), 역사비평사
- 이용우, "반유대주의와 국가적 협력－독일 강점기 프랑스의 유대인 박해, 1940-1944－", 서양사론, (101), pp.125~156 (2009), 한국서양사학회