본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

11세기 후반 『釋摩訶衍論』의 동아시아 유통과 영향

The Distribution and Influence of the Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana(釋摩訶衍論) in the late 11th Century East Asia

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Buddhist texts were actively exchanged in the late 11th century among East Asian countries of East Asia. This active exchange was a consequence of completion of Daejang gyeong(大藏經 tripitaka) in the Liao dynasty(遼) and the publication of scriptures led by Uicheon(義天) of Goryeo(高麗). It was Liao dynasty and Goryeo rather than Song dynasty that played a leading role in the exchange of the Buddhist texts in this age. The Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana(釋摩訶衍論 The Shi moheyan lun) was a representative Buddhist publication that showed the exchanges among East Asian countries. This book is supposed to have been published in Silla(新羅) or Tang dynasty(唐) in the mid-8th century. After including the Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana into the Daejang gyeong in the Liao dynasty in 1062, this book was placed in the center of Buddhism. Its main reason was that Emperor Daozong(道宗) was interested in this book, and let monks publish commentary. The Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana and its commentary, published by Shuizhen(守臻), Fawu(法悟), and Zhifu(志福) in 1070s, ㅈwas introduced to Goryeo, and these books were included in the Sinpyeon jejong gyojang chongnok(新編諸宗教藏總錄 The Newly Compiled Comprehensive Record of the Canonical Works of the Various Schools) as a commentary of the Awakening of Mahayana Faith(大乘起信論 The Daeseung gisillon). On the other hand, Uicheon published the Junggyo Shi moheyan lun(重校釋摩訶衍論 The Double-proofread Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana), and introduced this to the Song dynasty. In addition, Uicheon published the commentary of Zhifu and Fawu in 1099, and introduced these books to the Song dynasty and Japan. This study intends to analyze main two reasons why the Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana was newly spotlighted by the Buddhist circles of the Liao dynasty, Song dynasty, Goryeo and Japan in the late 11th century. First, the Buddhist circles of the Liao dynasty, Song dynasty, and Goryeo strongly tended to study the Awakening of Mahayana Faith regardless of religious sects. Second, the Buddhist circles of those countries had a strong esoteric characteristic. In addition, this study analyzes the distribution and influence of the Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana and publication of its commentaries on the Buddhist circles of the Liao dynasty, Song dynasty, Goryeo and Japan. Buddhists of the Liao dynasty learned the Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana regardless of their religious sects, and significantly quoted them in their books. Puguan(普觀) of the Song dynasty wrote a commentary which was quoted by Liao Daejang gyeong edition(遼本), Yan edition(燕本), Goryeo edition(麗本), and was actively quoted by Buddhist monks. The Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana, recognized as a commentary of the Awakening of Mahayana Faith, included in the The Secondly-engraved Goryeo Buddhist Tripitaka(高麗再雕大藏經 Goryeo Jaejo Daejang gyeong), and it was quoted in Bohwan(普幻)‘s Sureung-eomgyeong hwanhae sanbogi (首楞嚴經環解刪補記). In addition, many commentaries of the Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana were published in Japan.

Abstract

Buddhist texts were actively exchanged in the late 11th century among East Asian countries of East Asia. This active exchange was a consequence of completion of Daejang gyeong(大藏經 tripitaka) in the Liao dynasty(遼) and the publication of scriptures led by Uicheon(義天) of Goryeo(高麗). It was Liao dynasty and Goryeo rather than Song dynasty that played a leading role in the exchange of the Buddhist texts in this age. The Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana(釋摩訶衍論 The Shi moheyan lun) was a representative Buddhist publication that showed the exchanges among East Asian countries. This book is supposed to have been published in Silla(新羅) or Tang dynasty(唐) in the mid-8th century. After including the Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana into the Daejang gyeong in the Liao dynasty in 1062, this book was placed in the center of Buddhism. Its main reason was that Emperor Daozong(道宗) was interested in this book, and let monks publish commentary. The Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana and its commentary, published by Shuizhen(守臻), Fawu(法悟), and Zhifu(志福) in 1070s, ㅈwas introduced to Goryeo, and these books were included in the Sinpyeon jejong gyojang chongnok(新編諸宗教藏總錄 The Newly Compiled Comprehensive Record of the Canonical Works of the Various Schools) as a commentary of the Awakening of Mahayana Faith(大乘起信論 The Daeseung gisillon). On the other hand, Uicheon published the Junggyo Shi moheyan lun(重校釋摩訶衍論 The Double-proofread Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana), and introduced this to the Song dynasty. In addition, Uicheon published the commentary of Zhifu and Fawu in 1099, and introduced these books to the Song dynasty and Japan. This study intends to analyze main two reasons why the Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana was newly spotlighted by the Buddhist circles of the Liao dynasty, Song dynasty, Goryeo and Japan in the late 11th century. First, the Buddhist circles of the Liao dynasty, Song dynasty, and Goryeo strongly tended to study the Awakening of Mahayana Faith regardless of religious sects. Second, the Buddhist circles of those countries had a strong esoteric characteristic. In addition, this study analyzes the distribution and influence of the Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana and publication of its commentaries on the Buddhist circles of the Liao dynasty, Song dynasty, Goryeo and Japan. Buddhists of the Liao dynasty learned the Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana regardless of their religious sects, and significantly quoted them in their books. Puguan(普觀) of the Song dynasty wrote a commentary which was quoted by Liao Daejang gyeong edition(遼本), Yan edition(燕本), Goryeo edition(麗本), and was actively quoted by Buddhist monks. The Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana, recognized as a commentary of the Awakening of Mahayana Faith, included in the The Secondly-engraved Goryeo Buddhist Tripitaka(高麗再雕大藏經 Goryeo Jaejo Daejang gyeong), and it was quoted in Bohwan(普幻)‘s Sureung-eomgyeong hwanhae sanbogi (首楞嚴經環解刪補記). In addition, many commentaries of the Explanation of the Treatise on Mahayana were published in Japan.

참고문헌 (66)

  1. "遼史", ~
  2. "全遼文", ~
  3. "高麗史", ~
  4. "三國遺事", ~
  5. "「義湘和尙投師禮」, "韓國佛敎全書" 11", ~
  6. "釋摩訶衍論, 大正新修大藏經 32", ~
  7. 觀復, "遺教經論記, 卍新纂續藏經 53", ~
  8. 道㲀, "顯密圓通成佛心要集, 大正藏 46", ~
  9. "法界圖記叢髓錄, 韓國佛敎全書 6", ~
  10. 法悟, "釋摩訶衍論贊玄疏, 續藏經 45", ~
  11. 普觀, "法界無差別論疏領要鈔, 續藏經 46", ~
  12. 普觀, "釋摩訶衍論記, 續藏經 46", ~
  13. 普觀, "盂蘭盆經疏會古通今記序, 續藏經 21", ~
  14. 普幻, "首楞嚴經環解刪補記, 韓國佛敎全書 6", ~
  15. 善月, "楞伽阿跋多羅寶經通義 권1, 續藏經 17", ~
  16. 守臻, "應縣木塔遼代秘藏" (1991), 文物出版社
  17. 元照, "觀無量壽佛經義疏, 大正藏 37", ~
  18. 元照, "遺教經論住法記, 續藏經 53", ~
  19. 義天, "別傳心法義後序, 續藏經 57", ~
  20. 義天, "圓宗文類, 韓國佛敎全書 4", ~
  21. 義天, "大覺國師文集, 韓國佛敎全書 4", ~
  22. 義天, "新編諸宗敎藏總錄, 韓國佛敎全書 4", ~
  23. 子璿, "起信論疏筆削記, 大正藏 44", ~
  24. 宗密, "圓覺經大疏釋義鈔, 續藏經 9", ~
  25. 宗密, "圓覺經疏鈔, 續藏經 9", ~
  26. 宗曉, "樂邦遺稿幷序, 大正藏 47", ~
  27. 志磐, "佛祖統紀, 大正藏 49", ~
  28. 志福, "釋摩訶衍論通玄鈔, 續藏經 46", ~
  29. 中國佛敎協會, "房山石經 : 遼金刻經" (1992), 中國佛敎圖書文物館
  30. "中華電子佛典協會"[URL]
  31. 金福順, "新羅華嚴宗硏究" (1990), 민족사
  32. 동국대학교불교문화연구소(편), "韓國佛敎撰述文獻總錄" (1976), 동국대학교출판부
  33. 이부키 아츠시, "새롭게 다시 쓰는 중국 禪의 역사" (2005), 대숲바람
  34. 鄭性本, "中國禪宗의 成立史 硏究" (1991), 민족사
  35. 趙明基, "高麗大覺國師와 天台思想" (1964), 東國文化社
  36. 鎌田茂雄, "中國華嚴思想史の硏究" (1965), 東京大學出版會
  37. 大屋德城, "高麗續藏雕造攷" (1936), 便利堂
  38. 木村淸孝, "中國華嚴思想史" (1992), 平樂寺書店
  39. 森田龍僊, "釋摩訶衍論之硏究" (1935), 山城玉文政堂
  40. 石井公成, "華嚴思想の硏究" (1996), 春秋社
  41. 神尾弌春, "契丹佛敎文化史考" (1937), 滿洲文化協會
  42. 塚本善隆, "塚本善隆著作集 5 中國近世佛敎史の諸問題" (1975), 大東出版社
  43. 竺沙雅章, "宋元佛敎文化史硏究" (2000), 汲古書院
  44. 平川彰(編), "如來藏と大乘起信論" (1990), 春秋社
  45. 張踐, "中國宋遼金夏宗敎史" (1994), 人民出版社
  46. 陳述(編), "遼金史論集" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
  47. 강순애, "송광사 사천왕상 발굴의 丹本章疏「法華經玄贊古通今新抄」권1.2에 관한 서지적 연구", 서지학연구, (30), pp.5~43 (2005), 한국서지학회
  48. 金相鉉, "新羅 華嚴信仰의 展開" (1991), 민족사
  49. 김수연, "高麗時代 密敎史 硏究", 박사, 사학과, pp.2012
  50. 김영미, "11세기 후반~12세기 초 고려ㆍ요의 외교관계와 불경교류", 역사와 현실, 43 (2002)
  51. 김영미, "高麗와 遼의 불교 교류 -『釋摩訶衍論』을 중심으로-", 한국사상사학, (33), pp.109~131 (2009), 한국사상사학회
  52. 김영미, "11세기 후반 遼ㆍ高麗 불교계와 元曉", 元曉學硏究, 16 (2011)
  53. 김지연, "『釋摩訶衍論』의 註釋的 硏究 : 『海東疏』와 『賢首義記』의 비교를 중심으로", 박사, 불교학과, pp.2014
  54. 김천학, "헤이안시대 화엄종에 보이는 신라불교사상의 역할", 범한철학, 70(3), pp.1~29 (2013), 범한철학회
  55. 남권희, "契丹과 高麗의 佛敎文獻 交流", 서지학연구, (56), pp.5~42 (2013), 한국서지학회
  56. 閔泳珪, "曉星趙明基博士追慕 佛敎史學論文集" (1988), 東國大學校 出版部
  57. 박인석, "대승기신론내의약탐기" (2011), 동국대학교출판부
  58. 李箕永, "韓國密敎思想硏究" (1986), 東國大學校 出版部
  59. 李永子, "義天의 新編諸宗敎藏總錄의 獨自性", 佛敎學報, 19 (1982)
  60. 최병헌, "義天과 宋의 天台宗" (1992), 伽山佛敎文化振興院
  61. 최연식, "珍嵩의 􋺷孔目章記􋺸 逸文에 대한 연구", 天台學硏究, 4 (2003)
  62. 吉田剛, "北宋代に於ける華嚴興隆の經緯 : 華嚴敎學史に於ける長水子璿の位置づけ", 駒澤大學禪學硏究所年報, 9 (1998)
  63. 遠藤純一郞, "<釋摩訶衍論> 新羅成立說に觀する考察", 智山學報, 45 (1996)
  64. 國家文物局文物保護科學技術硏究所, "山西應縣佛宮寺木塔內發現遼代珍貴文物", 文物, 6 (1982)
  65. 傅振倫, "遼代調印的佛經佛像", 文物, 6 (1982)
  66. 王未想, "遼上京硏究論文選" (2006), 政協巴林左旗委員會

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)