高麗大藏經本 『釋摩訶衍論』의 底本 연구
A Study on the Original Script of Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna(釋摩訶衍論) in the Goryeo Canon
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna(Shi moheyan lun 釋摩訶衍論) was included in the second edition of the Goryeo Canon following the Liao(Khitan) Canon. In this aspect, this paper examines several wooden-printed versions of Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna and the implication of the text in the Goryeo Canon. Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna in the Goryeo Canon shows differences from the version in the Liao Canon based on the Fangshan shijing(房山石經) edition, with regard to the content and transcription of the spell. Therefore, two wooden-printed versions in the Goryeo and Liao Canon are not same each other. By comparing the texts in the Goryeo, Liao and Yan(燕) editions, fragmentarily quoted in the Note of Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna(釋摩訶衍論記) by Puguan(普觀) of the Southern Song dynasty, it is also found that the Liao edition is the Fangshan shijing edition and the Goryeo edition is different from the one in the Goryeo Canon. In addition, the one in the Goryeo Canon is the most similar to the one in the Yan edition, but they are not identical. It is resulted from the comparison between the excerpts of the commentary on Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna by a Buddhist monk of Khitan and the text in the Goryeo Canon. Considering that Dàozōng(道宗, 在位1055-1101) wrote the introduction(引文) on Comprehensive Profound Extracts of Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna(釋摩訶衍論通玄鈔) by Zhifu(志福) and mentioned its collation, there was a newly printed version in Khitan, based on the collation. Fawu(法悟) also would contain emperor’s interpretation on Praising Profound Commentary of Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna(釋摩訶衍論贊玄疏), discussing on the new version with Dàozōng. From this point of view, it is assumed that the text Fawu referred to was a newly printed Yan edition and it was different from the one in the Liao Canon which Zhifu referred to. After the texts written by Buddhist monks of Khitan and the Yan edition were introduced to Goryeo, Double-proofread Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna(重校釋摩訶衍論) was collated by Uicheon(義天, 1055-1101). Therefore, it is suggested that Double-proofread Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna was included in the second edition of the Goryeo Canon.
Abstract
Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna(Shi moheyan lun 釋摩訶衍論) was included in the second edition of the Goryeo Canon following the Liao(Khitan) Canon. In this aspect, this paper examines several wooden-printed versions of Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna and the implication of the text in the Goryeo Canon. Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna in the Goryeo Canon shows differences from the version in the Liao Canon based on the Fangshan shijing(房山石經) edition, with regard to the content and transcription of the spell. Therefore, two wooden-printed versions in the Goryeo and Liao Canon are not same each other. By comparing the texts in the Goryeo, Liao and Yan(燕) editions, fragmentarily quoted in the Note of Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna(釋摩訶衍論記) by Puguan(普觀) of the Southern Song dynasty, it is also found that the Liao edition is the Fangshan shijing edition and the Goryeo edition is different from the one in the Goryeo Canon. In addition, the one in the Goryeo Canon is the most similar to the one in the Yan edition, but they are not identical. It is resulted from the comparison between the excerpts of the commentary on Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna by a Buddhist monk of Khitan and the text in the Goryeo Canon. Considering that Dàozōng(道宗, 在位1055-1101) wrote the introduction(引文) on Comprehensive Profound Extracts of Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna(釋摩訶衍論通玄鈔) by Zhifu(志福) and mentioned its collation, there was a newly printed version in Khitan, based on the collation. Fawu(法悟) also would contain emperor’s interpretation on Praising Profound Commentary of Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna(釋摩訶衍論贊玄疏), discussing on the new version with Dàozōng. From this point of view, it is assumed that the text Fawu referred to was a newly printed Yan edition and it was different from the one in the Liao Canon which Zhifu referred to. After the texts written by Buddhist monks of Khitan and the Yan edition were introduced to Goryeo, Double-proofread Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna(重校釋摩訶衍論) was collated by Uicheon(義天, 1055-1101). Therefore, it is suggested that Double-proofread Explanation of the Treatise on Mahāyāna was included in the second edition of the Goryeo Canon.
참고문헌 (32)
- "遼史", ~
- 陳述, "全遼文" (1981), 中華書局
- "高麗大藏經 권37" (1976), 동국대학교
- "釋摩訶衍論"
- 法敏, "釋摩訶衍論疏"
- 法悟, "釋摩訶衍論贊玄疏 卷5"
- 普觀, "釋摩訶衍論記"
- 聖法, "釋摩訶衍論記"
- 守其, "高麗國新雕大藏校正別錄" (1994), 동국역경원
- 守臻, "釋摩訶衍論通贊疏 卷10" (1991), 文物出版社
- 實叉難陀, "大乘起信論"
- 義天, "大覺國師文集"
- 志福, "釋摩訶衍論通玄鈔"
- 眞諦, "大乘起信論"
- 中國佛敎協會, "房山石經 : 遼金刻經" (1992), 中國佛敎圖書文物館
- 박용진, "의천 : 그의 생애와 사상" (2011), 혜안
- 김수연, "高麗時代 密敎史 硏究", 박사, 사학과, pp.2012
- 김영미, "高麗와 遼의 불교 교류 －『釋摩訶衍論』을 중심으로－", 한국사상사학, (33), pp.109~131 (2009), 한국사상사학회
- 김영미, "11세기 후반 遼高麗 불교계와 元曉", 元曉學硏究, 16 (2011)
- 김영미, "11세기 후반 『釋摩訶衍論』의 동아시아 유통과 영향", 이화사학연구, (49), pp.1~40 (2014), 이화사학연구소[DOI]
- 김지연, "그들은 동일한 텍스트를 보았는가? - <석마하연론> 텍스트 교감과 계통 -", 불교학보, (88), pp.59~88 (2019), 불교문화연구원
- 李箕永, "韓國密敎思想硏究" (1986), 東國大學校出版部
- 大屋德城, "高麗續藏雕造攷" (1937), 便利堂
- 森田龍僊, "釋摩訶衍論之硏究" (1935), 山城玉文政堂
- 塚本善隆, "塚本善隆著作集 5 中國近世佛敎史の諸問題" (1975), 大東出版社
- 竺沙雅章, "宋元佛敎文化史硏究" (2000), 汲古書院
- 關悠倫, "『釋摩訶衍論』の成立事情: 序의 記述と武則天と則天文字", 密敎學硏究, 50 (2018), 日本密敎學會
- 吉川太一郞, "佛敎文化硏究論集", 佛敎文化硏究論集, 15.16 (2013), 東京大學靑年會
- 那須政隆, "釈摩訶衍論講義", 成田山仏教研究所紀要, 통권 : 4 (1979)
- 遠藤純一郞, "<釋摩訶衍論> 新羅成立說に觀する考察", 智山學報, 45 (1996)
- 中村正文, "釋摩訶衍論の成立問題について", 印度學佛敎學硏究, 68 (1986)
- 傅振倫, "遼代調印的佛經佛像", 文物, (6) (1982)