본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

샤를마뉴의 대관식 의례와 그 의미

The Meaning of the Coronation Rite of Charlemagne

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The coronation of Charlemagne symbolizes the union of three elements that formed the basis for the medieval civilization, i.e. Roman Empire, the roman catholic faith and the Franks. The rite of coronation was composed of some steps: crowning, clamor(laudes), anointing(or untion) and adoration. Since the roman coronation rite had not performed from the fall of the Western Roman Empire, the pope, presider of this rite, might imitate the coronation rite of Byzantine Emperor. Crowning, clamor, and adoration were same as those of Byzantine tradition. The crown must be the diadem, same as layed on the head of Byzantine Emperor. It means the choice of the god. And the clamor means the agreement of people(vox populi) from ancient Rome. These two ceremonies, based upon the tradition of Roman Empire, represent the sources of power: the choice of the god and the election of people. But the adoration and the anointing were not derived from the Roman Empire. The adoration by the patriarch of Constantinople was an act of homage to the Byzantine Emperor as the head of the administration and the religion, based upon the caesaropapism. Considering these three ceremonies, Charlemagne ascended the Roman Emperor, same as the counterpart in Constantinople. But Charlemagne was not same as the Byzantine Emperor. Because the pope change the order of the rite. In Byzantine tradition, the patriarch imposed the diadem on the Emperor’s head after the clamor of people. It means that the Emperor was elected by the people and was ratified by the crown. But in the coronation of Charlemagne, the pope crowned him first and then the people, attending the ceremony, clamored “Imperator et Augustus.” This change means that the people celebrated the Emperor after the choice of the god, which was expressed by the pope as God's representative on Earth. So Charlemagne was the Christian Emperor. Especially the anointing was a unique ceremony, only held in the West, not in the East(Byzantine Empire) until late ninth century. Charlemagne was not anointed in 800, because already anointed in 753. The anointing used to be a christian ceremony. It was particularly important among the kingdom of Germanic tribes, such as Visigoths and Franks, because they considered that the anointing gave the holiness to royal power. So Charlemagne was the King of Franks.

Abstract

The coronation of Charlemagne symbolizes the union of three elements that formed the basis for the medieval civilization, i.e. Roman Empire, the roman catholic faith and the Franks. The rite of coronation was composed of some steps: crowning, clamor(laudes), anointing(or untion) and adoration. Since the roman coronation rite had not performed from the fall of the Western Roman Empire, the pope, presider of this rite, might imitate the coronation rite of Byzantine Emperor. Crowning, clamor, and adoration were same as those of Byzantine tradition. The crown must be the diadem, same as layed on the head of Byzantine Emperor. It means the choice of the god. And the clamor means the agreement of people(vox populi) from ancient Rome. These two ceremonies, based upon the tradition of Roman Empire, represent the sources of power: the choice of the god and the election of people. But the adoration and the anointing were not derived from the Roman Empire. The adoration by the patriarch of Constantinople was an act of homage to the Byzantine Emperor as the head of the administration and the religion, based upon the caesaropapism. Considering these three ceremonies, Charlemagne ascended the Roman Emperor, same as the counterpart in Constantinople. But Charlemagne was not same as the Byzantine Emperor. Because the pope change the order of the rite. In Byzantine tradition, the patriarch imposed the diadem on the Emperor’s head after the clamor of people. It means that the Emperor was elected by the people and was ratified by the crown. But in the coronation of Charlemagne, the pope crowned him first and then the people, attending the ceremony, clamored “Imperator et Augustus.” This change means that the people celebrated the Emperor after the choice of the god, which was expressed by the pope as God's representative on Earth. So Charlemagne was the Christian Emperor. Especially the anointing was a unique ceremony, only held in the West, not in the East(Byzantine Empire) until late ninth century. Charlemagne was not anointed in 800, because already anointed in 753. The anointing used to be a christian ceremony. It was particularly important among the kingdom of Germanic tribes, such as Visigoths and Franks, because they considered that the anointing gave the holiness to royal power. So Charlemagne was the King of Franks.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. A. Vasilief, "A History of the Byzantine Empire, 324-1453" (1973), The University of Wisconsin Press
  2. "Annales Laurenshamensis, MGH, ss. vol. 1", ~
  3. "Annales Regni Francorum, 801년"[URL]
  4. B. W. Scholz, "Carolingian Chronicles", pp.81~ (1972), The University of Michigan Press
  5. "Catholic Encyclopedia, ‘coronation 항목", ~
  6. E. Katorowicz, "Laudes Regiae: une étude des acclamations liturgiques et du culte du souverain au moyen age, traduit par Alain Wijffels" (2004), Fayard
  7. Einhard, "Two Lives of Charlemagne" (1972)
  8. Liber Pontificalis, "L. Duchesne, 2 vols" (1886)
  9. Ph. Dwyer, "‘Citizen Emperor’: Political Ritual, Popular Sovereignty and the Coronation of Napoleon I", History, 100, pp.42~46 (2015)
  10. R. Folz, "The Concept of empire in Western Europe : from the fifth to the fourteenth century" (1969), Edward Arnold
  11. R. Folz, "The Coronation of Charlemagne, 25 December 800" (1974), Routledge & K. Paul
  12. E.H Kantorowicz, "Laudes Regiae: une etude des acclamations liturgiques et du culte du souverain au moyen age, traduit de l’anglais par Alain Wijffels" (2004), Fayard
  13. R. Poupardin, "L'Onction imperiale, Le Moyen Age, t.18", 113~126 (1905)
  14. 김차규, "비잔티움 세계와 서유럽-시각의 차-", 인문과학연구논총, (29) (2008)
  15. 박용진, "기적을 행하는 왕" (2015), 한길사
  16. 성백용, "샤를마뉴, 열두 세기에 걸친 황제의 전설", 역사비평, (72), pp.388~416 (2005), 역사문제연구소
  17. 성백용, "샤를마뉴에 대한 중세 독일과 프랑스에서의 엇갈리는 기억", 프랑스사 연구, (17), pp.5~34 (2007), 한국프랑스사학회
  18. 이경구, "신성로마제국의 성격:교황권과 황제권의 관계를 중심으로", 서양사연구, 37
  19. 이경구, "신성로마제국의 출발점에 관하여", 서양중세사연구, (13) (2004), 한국서양중세사학회
  20. 이경구, "중세 서유럽인들의 비잔티움 타자화: 800년 샤를마뉴의 황제 대관식 사건을 중심으로", 서양중세사연구, (23), pp.1~30 (2009), 한국서양중세사학회
  21. 이경구, "로마교회와 프랑크왕국의 제휴―피핀의 쿠데타를 중심으로―", 서양중세사연구, (8) (2001), 한국서양중세사학회
  22. 이경구, "스테파누스 2세와 피핀의 상봉:그 역사적 의미", 서양중세사연구, (9) (2002), 한국서양중세사학회
  23. 신준형, "비잔틴 성상 복구 운동(8세기)과 신성로마제국의 대응", 서양미술사학회 논문집, (24), pp.9~25 (2005), 서양미술사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)