신라 중대 花郞徒와 國學
The Hwarangdo and Gukhak during the Middle Ages of Silla
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Until the time when king Munmu of Silla successfully completed the Silla-Tang War, Hwarangdo remained a warrior group. When the war ended, however, Kim heumdol’s revolt led to king Sinmun remarkably weakening the role and function of the Hwarangdo because of. Instead, he improved the function of the Gukhak, a school system in Silla, to recruit talent. His action was aimed at selecting people who had Confucian knowledge through Gukhak, as opposed to through Hwarangdo. This was his continuous and well-organized plan to demand and supply human resources. However, Hwarangdo was newly born during the Hyoso Dinasty. King Hyoso couldn't ignore the requests of the noblesse, so to reduce complaints of the young men from Jingol and six bone rank, he restored Hwarangdo. The king then allowed Guksun to lead the Hwarangdo rather than Pungwolju because the king compromised with aristocracy. Thus, the newly born Hwarangdo was different from that of the middle Ages with respect to the roles and functions. The warrior personality almost disappeared and turned into a group that only played a role in assuaging the discontent of young people who failed to enter Gukhak. In Gyeongdeok dynasty, Hwarangdo lost its role of recruiting talent due to the new readjustment of the Gukhak. However, this did not change Hwarangdo into an amusement association, as was the case with existed research. The children of those who emigrated from Goguryeo and Baekje also entered Hwarangdo, and they played a big role in Silla becoming one big society. In this regard, the reformation of Gukhak by King Sinmun affected the loss of the essential function of Hwarangdo. By contrast, with the political changes of the Middle Ages and the revival of the Nokeup, a taxation system in Silla, Hwarangdo found a new way to be maintained. These changes in Hwarangdo later affected Silla. In addition, as shown in the examples of the rebellion by Hwarang Myeonggi and Allak, Hwarangdo moved faster with the process of deterioration, not change.
Abstract
Until the time when king Munmu of Silla successfully completed the Silla-Tang War, Hwarangdo remained a warrior group. When the war ended, however, Kim heumdol’s revolt led to king Sinmun remarkably weakening the role and function of the Hwarangdo because of. Instead, he improved the function of the Gukhak, a school system in Silla, to recruit talent. His action was aimed at selecting people who had Confucian knowledge through Gukhak, as opposed to through Hwarangdo. This was his continuous and well-organized plan to demand and supply human resources. However, Hwarangdo was newly born during the Hyoso Dinasty. King Hyoso couldn't ignore the requests of the noblesse, so to reduce complaints of the young men from Jingol and six bone rank, he restored Hwarangdo. The king then allowed Guksun to lead the Hwarangdo rather than Pungwolju because the king compromised with aristocracy. Thus, the newly born Hwarangdo was different from that of the middle Ages with respect to the roles and functions. The warrior personality almost disappeared and turned into a group that only played a role in assuaging the discontent of young people who failed to enter Gukhak. In Gyeongdeok dynasty, Hwarangdo lost its role of recruiting talent due to the new readjustment of the Gukhak. However, this did not change Hwarangdo into an amusement association, as was the case with existed research. The children of those who emigrated from Goguryeo and Baekje also entered Hwarangdo, and they played a big role in Silla becoming one big society. In this regard, the reformation of Gukhak by King Sinmun affected the loss of the essential function of Hwarangdo. By contrast, with the political changes of the Middle Ages and the revival of the Nokeup, a taxation system in Silla, Hwarangdo found a new way to be maintained. These changes in Hwarangdo later affected Silla. In addition, as shown in the examples of the rebellion by Hwarang Myeonggi and Allak, Hwarangdo moved faster with the process of deterioration, not change.
참고문헌 (31)
- 金壽泰, "新羅中代政治史硏究" (1996), 一潮閣
- 盧泰敦, "한국고대사의 이론과 쟁점" (2009), 집문당
- 朴南守, "신라 화백제도와 화랑도" (2013), 주류성
- 李基東, "新羅骨品制社會와 花郞徒" (1984), 一潮閣
- 李基東, "新羅社會史硏究" (1997), 潮閣
- 李基白, "新羅政治社會史硏究" (1986), 一潮閣
- 李文基, "新羅兵制史硏究" (1997), 一潮閣
- 주보돈, "김춘추와 그의 사람들" (2018), 지식산업사
- 고경석, "신라 관인선발제도의 변화", 역사와 현실, 23 (1997)
- 金壽泰, "新羅 神文王代 전제왕권의 확립과 金欽突亂", 新羅文化, 9 (1992)
- 김덕원, "신라 國學의 설립과 그 주도세력", 진단학보, (112), pp.1~25 (2011), 진단학회
- 김창겸, "强首와 新羅 社會", 진단학보, (101), pp.33~66 (2006), 진단학회
- 盧重國, "新羅와 高句麗百濟의 人才養成과 選拔", 新羅文化祭學術發表會論文集, 19 (1998)
- 盧泰敦, "羅代의 門客", 韓國史硏究, 21(22) (1978)
- 박남수, "新羅 中古期 花郞徒의 敎育과 出仕", 역사교육, (108), pp.99~125 (2008), 역사교육연구회
- 朴南守, "石門 李基東敎授 停年紀念論叢" (2009), 주류성
- 李基東, "新羅社會와 花郞徒", 新羅文化, 1 (1984)
- 李基東, "花郞像의 변천에 관한 覺書: 花郞文化論에 부쳐서", 新羅文化, 5 (1988)
- 李基白, "新羅私兵考", 歷史學報, 9 (1957)
- 李鍾旭, "新羅 中古時代의 花郞徒", 省谷論叢, 27(4) (1996)
- 이희관, "신라의 인재 양성과 선발" (1998), 신라문화선양회
- 주보돈, "신라 국학과 인재 양성" (2015), 주류성
- 鄭雲龍, "新羅 花郞制의 成立과 人才 選拔", 新羅文化祭學術發表會論文集, 19 (1998)
- 전미희, "元曉의 身分과 活動", 韓國史硏究, 63 (1988)
- 정호섭, "新羅의 國學과 學生祿邑", 史叢, 58 (2004)
- 조범환, "新羅 中古期 郎徒와 花郞", 한국고대사연구, (52), pp.403~434 (2008), 한국고대사학회
- 조범환, "신라 화랑도와 승려", 서강인문논총, (33), pp.179~214 (2012), 인문과학연구소[DOI]
- 朱甫暾, "新羅 花郞徒 硏究의 現況과 課題", 啓明史學, 8 (1997)
- 최홍조, "神文王代 金欽突 亂의 재검토", 大丘史學, 58 (1999)
- 한준수, "신라 국학과 인재 양성" (2015), 민속원
- 홍기자, "신라 하대 讀書三品科", 신라문화제학술발표회논문집, 19 (1998)
