본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1900년대 동아시아의 『越南亡國史』 유통과 수용- 한국, 중국, 월남을 중심으로 -

An Acceptance and Circulation of History of the Fall of Vietnam(越南亡國史) in the 1900s, East Asia

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

History of the Fall of Vietnam was commonly written in Japan by Yang Gye Cho(Liang Qichao) of China, a political refugee to Japan and Phan Hoi Chau of Vietnam, a political refugee to Japan, and published in November, 1905 in Shanghai. It accused the process of the invasion of France and the fall of Vietnam, and exposed to the world the threat of the western empires against Asia. After its publication, it was widely circulated and read in 1900's in Vietnam, as well as in the East Asian countries of China, Korea and Japan. Five editions were issued from 1905 to 1911 in China, and then more of the various editions were issued and distributed several times. In Vietnam, though it was under the French regime, the book was secretly circulated and read in copies, and were utilized as a promulgating material of the anti-France revolution as one of the guidances for the national campaign. In Korea the History of the Fall of Vietnam was also widely read. As many of three Korean versions were published in Hyunchae translation in November 1906, Ju Shi Kyung translation in November 1907 and Lee Sang translation in December 1907. One of the elements that the book caught attention simultaneously in Korea, China and Vietnam was the influence of the co-author, Liang Qichao. The book was rapidly accepted in these three countries because the people of those three countries were taking his reformism as a new idea for transformation of the society. Another element seems to be that China and Korea must have been endeavoring to make good use of the Vietnamese case for an instrument to cope with the crisis of losing their own countries. The way of accepting the book however was not the same among the three countries. Liang Qichao's original was circulated and accepted in China, of which issuance of up to the 5th edition in 6 years until 1911 shows its big influence to the Chinese people. Whenever the national crisis increased at that time, China used to publish the collapsing histories of other countries to let the people share the feeling of the crisis. Re-edition of the “History of the Fall of Vietnam” contributed to enhancing Chinese people's sense of nation, and also served as a source of a new culture, causing the birth of the 20 century's reformed play of the “History of the Fall of Vietnam”. In Vietnam as well, the Liang Qichao's original was circulated and accepted, but in secrecy under the colonial regime of France. The book was used as a material for the national education, a guidance for anti-colonial movement, and even a maesn for the propaganda to reveal the despotic colonial rule of France and to agitate public opinion. It was distinctive in Korea that the original was interpreted in Korean way, to be translated into and issued as an another version of the “Fall of Vietnam” which was not the same as the former. Hyunchae's translation version, for instance, a part of Liang Qichao's “Brief History of the Fall of Chosun” was inserted, and was published under the name of the “History of the fall of Vietnam - Addendum, New theory on a Disappearing Country”, which played a role to invigorate the anxiety of saving the country. Analyzing the fact that China, Korea and Vietnam of the East Asia in 1900's shared the experience of losing the country, and that they newly interpreted and accepted the “History of the Fall of Vietnam” according to the situation of each Country, shows us the real image of the knowledge exchange in the late 1900's.

Abstract

History of the Fall of Vietnam was commonly written in Japan by Yang Gye Cho(Liang Qichao) of China, a political refugee to Japan and Phan Hoi Chau of Vietnam, a political refugee to Japan, and published in November, 1905 in Shanghai. It accused the process of the invasion of France and the fall of Vietnam, and exposed to the world the threat of the western empires against Asia. After its publication, it was widely circulated and read in 1900's in Vietnam, as well as in the East Asian countries of China, Korea and Japan. Five editions were issued from 1905 to 1911 in China, and then more of the various editions were issued and distributed several times. In Vietnam, though it was under the French regime, the book was secretly circulated and read in copies, and were utilized as a promulgating material of the anti-France revolution as one of the guidances for the national campaign. In Korea the History of the Fall of Vietnam was also widely read. As many of three Korean versions were published in Hyunchae translation in November 1906, Ju Shi Kyung translation in November 1907 and Lee Sang translation in December 1907. One of the elements that the book caught attention simultaneously in Korea, China and Vietnam was the influence of the co-author, Liang Qichao. The book was rapidly accepted in these three countries because the people of those three countries were taking his reformism as a new idea for transformation of the society. Another element seems to be that China and Korea must have been endeavoring to make good use of the Vietnamese case for an instrument to cope with the crisis of losing their own countries. The way of accepting the book however was not the same among the three countries. Liang Qichao's original was circulated and accepted in China, of which issuance of up to the 5th edition in 6 years until 1911 shows its big influence to the Chinese people. Whenever the national crisis increased at that time, China used to publish the collapsing histories of other countries to let the people share the feeling of the crisis. Re-edition of the “History of the Fall of Vietnam” contributed to enhancing Chinese people's sense of nation, and also served as a source of a new culture, causing the birth of the 20 century's reformed play of the “History of the Fall of Vietnam”. In Vietnam as well, the Liang Qichao's original was circulated and accepted, but in secrecy under the colonial regime of France. The book was used as a material for the national education, a guidance for anti-colonial movement, and even a maesn for the propaganda to reveal the despotic colonial rule of France and to agitate public opinion. It was distinctive in Korea that the original was interpreted in Korean way, to be translated into and issued as an another version of the “Fall of Vietnam” which was not the same as the former. Hyunchae's translation version, for instance, a part of Liang Qichao's “Brief History of the Fall of Chosun” was inserted, and was published under the name of the “History of the fall of Vietnam - Addendum, New theory on a Disappearing Country”, which played a role to invigorate the anxiety of saving the country. Analyzing the fact that China, Korea and Vietnam of the East Asia in 1900's shared the experience of losing the country, and that they newly interpreted and accepted the “History of the Fall of Vietnam” according to the situation of each Country, shows us the real image of the knowledge exchange in the late 1900's.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 梁啓超纂, "越南亡國史" (1905), 廣智書局印刷
  2. 梁啓超, "飮氷室文集" (1932), 中華書局
  3. 玄采譯, "월남망국사", 아세아문화사
  4. 쥬시경, "월남망국" (1907), 박문셔관
  5. 李相益, "월남망국" (1907), 아세아문화사
  6. 玄采, "한국개화기교과서총서 3" (1977), 아세아문화사
  7. "황성신문", ~
  8. "대한매일신보", ~
  9. "신한민보", ~
  10. "경향신문", ~
  11. "해조신문", ~
  12. "경성신보", ~
  13. "국민보", ~
  14. "경무휘보 21호 (1910. 11)", ~
  15. "대한자강회월보 (제11호)", ~
  16. "독립신문 (175호, 1924.5.31)", ~
  17. "주한일본공사관기록 28" (1992), 국사편찬위원회
  18. 김홍일, "대지의 분노" (1972), 문조사
  19. 김소운, "하늘끝에 살아도 : 金素雲 自傳的 에세이" (1977), 동화출판공사
  20. 金秉喆, "韓國近代飜譯文學史硏究" (1975), 을유문화사
  21. 崔元植, "한국문학의 단계 II" (1983), 창작과비평사
  22. 유인선, "새로 쓴 베트남의 역사" (2002), 이산
  23. 오구라 사다오, "한권으로 읽는 베트남사" (1999), 일빛
  24. 최원식, "한국계몽주의문학사론" (2002), 소명출판
  25. 金根洙, "越南亡國史에 對하여", 韓國學, 5 (1977)
  26. 崔起榮, "國譯􋺷越南亡國史􋺸에 대한 一考察", 동아연구, 6 (1985)
  27. 崔起榮, "한말 천주교회와 􋺷越南亡國史􋺸", 아시아문화, (12) (1996)
  28. 유인선, "판 보이 쩌우(Phan Boi Chau, 1867~1940) ― 방황하는 베트남 초기 민족주의자 ―", 역사교육, (90), pp.181~206 (2004), 역사교육연구회
  29. 정환국, "근대계몽기 역사전기물 번역에 대하여-『越南亡國史』와『 伊太利建國三傑傳』의 경우", 대동문화연구, 48(48), pp.1~32 (2004), 대동문화연구원
  30. 최박광, "월남망국사와 동아시아 지식인들", 인문과학, 36 (2005)
  31. 송엽휘(宋曄輝), "?越南亡國史?의 飜譯 過程에 나타난 諸問題", 어문연구(語文硏究), 34(4), pp.183~204 (2006), 한국어문교육연구회
  32. 이종미, "《越南亡國史》와 국내 번역본 비교 연구", 중국인문과학, 34(34), pp.499~522 (2006), 중국인문학회
  33. 윤대영, "20세기 초 베트남 지식인들의 동아시아 인식- 連帶意識과 自民族中心主義 分析을 中心으로", 동아연구, 53(53), pp.327~360 (2007), 동아연구소
  34. 정근식, "검열에서 선전으로: 일제하 조선에서의 베트남담론의 추이", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (80), pp.71~107 (2008), 한국사회사학회
  35. 김주현, "<월남망국사>와 <의대리건국3걸전>의 첫 번역자", 한국현대문학연구, 29(29), pp.9~41 (2009), 한국현대문학회
  36. 윤대영, "19세기 후반~20세기 초, 한국의 베트남 재인식 과정과 그 성격", 동양사학연구, (112), pp.191~221 (2010), 동양사학회
  37. 고병권, "내셔널리즘 이전의 인터내셔널 -「월남망국사」의 조선어 번역에 대하여-", 한국근대문학연구, (21), pp.293~323 (2010), 한국근대문학회[DOI]
  38. 윤대영, "19세기 후반~20세기 초 베트남의 ‘新書’ 수용 ― 초기 개혁운동의 기원과 관련하여 ―", 동양사학연구, (117), pp.361~402 (2011), 동양사학회
  39. 송명진, "≪월남망국사≫의 번역, 문체, 출판", 현대문학의 연구, (42), pp.171~203 (2010), 한국문학연구학회
  40. 川本邦術, "潘佩珠の日本観", 歷史學硏究, 391 (1972)
  41. 川本邦術, "維新東遊期における潘佩珠の思想--ヴェトナム民族運動の起点", 思想 (1973)
  42. 川本邦術, "潘佩珠小史-その 生涯と 時代」, 􋺷ヴェトナム亡国史他", 東洋文庫, 73 (1977), 平凡社
  43. 鄒振環, "清末亡國史"編譯熱"與梁啟超的朝鮮亡國史研究", 韓國學硏究論叢, 2 (1996), 上海人民出版社
  44. 鄒振環, "梁啟超, 潘佩珠的《越南亡國史》及其在中國和朝鮮的傳播與影響", 韓國學研究論叢, 1 (2000), 辽宁民族出版社
  45. 韩国学研究论丛, "韓國學研究論叢 第1辑" (2000), 辽宁民族出版社
  46. 陳益源, "越南潘佩珠與日本, 中國之深厚關係—以潘佩珠對於西方建國英雄事蹟的吸收與轉化為例", 漢學研究學刊(馬來亞大學中文系), 1 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)