본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

前燕 속의 ‘高句麗系 流民’

Goguryeo Migrants in the Former Yan

백다해
이화사학연구소 (Ewha Historical Institutions)|2021.12|이화사학연구 (EWHA SAHAK YEONGU)|제63호|pp. 165-199|DOI 10.37091/ewhist.2021..63.005

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

고구려Goguryeo이동migrationFormer Yan전연고구려계 유민유민사회Goguryeo Migrantsthe Goguryeo migrant society

초록

The period from the 4th to 6th centuries in East Asian society was ‘the age of migration’. The migration of nomads from the north to the south triggered a series of migrations of other groups. This paper explored the migration of Goguryeo(高句麗) in relation to the neighboring powers of East Asia by expanding the issue of ‘migration’, which has been discussed only in the relationship of ‘China’ or ‘center and periphery’. In particular, using the cases of the Goun(高雲), Gorim(高琳), and Go Youngsuk(高英淑) families found in the literature, this paper examined the Goguryeo migrants and their society that left Goguryeo in the 4th century and settled and resided in the Former Yan(前燕). To be specific, this study identified the ‘border’ formed between the two forces of Goguryeo and the Former Yan, and identified the aspects of the migration of the Goguryeo people, which were the prerequisites for the Goguryeo migrant society within the Former Yan. Goguryeo people went into the Former Yan as prisoners of war, diaspora, and hostages. Furthermore, it explained that Former Yan’s governance served as a background of maintenance of Goguryeo migrant society. Within the Former Yan, the Goguryeo migrant society of more than 50,000 people was formed, and they continued to sustain the society by following the changes of the Former Yan's center. Even after the Former Yan collapsed, they maintained an independent migrant society with the identity of ‘the Goguryeo people’. Focusing on the Goguryeo migrants and their society that existed in the Former Yan, this study aimed to reveal that Goguryeo was a member of East Asian society from the 4th to 6th centuries, ‘the age of migration’, and had close relations with the neighboring countries. The significance of this study was that it shed light to the interrelationship between Goguryeo and its neighboring countries, deviating the research trend that has emphasized the one-sided flow of ‘from the center to the periphery’.

Abstract

The period from the 4th to 6th centuries in East Asian society was ‘the age of migration’. The migration of nomads from the north to the south triggered a series of migrations of other groups. This paper explored the migration of Goguryeo(高句麗) in relation to the neighboring powers of East Asia by expanding the issue of ‘migration’, which has been discussed only in the relationship of ‘China’ or ‘center and periphery’. In particular, using the cases of the Goun(高雲), Gorim(高琳), and Go Youngsuk(高英淑) families found in the literature, this paper examined the Goguryeo migrants and their society that left Goguryeo in the 4th century and settled and resided in the Former Yan(前燕). To be specific, this study identified the ‘border’ formed between the two forces of Goguryeo and the Former Yan, and identified the aspects of the migration of the Goguryeo people, which were the prerequisites for the Goguryeo migrant society within the Former Yan. Goguryeo people went into the Former Yan as prisoners of war, diaspora, and hostages. Furthermore, it explained that Former Yan’s governance served as a background of maintenance of Goguryeo migrant society. Within the Former Yan, the Goguryeo migrant society of more than 50,000 people was formed, and they continued to sustain the society by following the changes of the Former Yan's center. Even after the Former Yan collapsed, they maintained an independent migrant society with the identity of ‘the Goguryeo people’. Focusing on the Goguryeo migrants and their society that existed in the Former Yan, this study aimed to reveal that Goguryeo was a member of East Asian society from the 4th to 6th centuries, ‘the age of migration’, and had close relations with the neighboring countries. The significance of this study was that it shed light to the interrelationship between Goguryeo and its neighboring countries, deviating the research trend that has emphasized the one-sided flow of ‘from the center to the periphery’.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. "三國史記", ~
  2. "晉書", ~
  3. "周書", ~
  4. "資治通鑑", ~
  5. "十六國春秋", ~
  6. "고영숙묘지명", ~
  7. 池培善, "中世東北亞史硏究 : 慕容王國史" (1986), 일조각
  8. 박한제, "中國中世胡漢體制硏究" (1988), 일조각
  9. 池培善, "中世 中國史 硏究 : 慕容燕과 北燕史" (1998), 연세대학교출판부
  10. 여호규, "중국 소재 고구려 유적과 유물 Ⅶ : 요동반도-태자하 유역" (2020), 동북아역사재단
  11. 여호규, "중국 소재 고구려 유적과 유물 Ⅷ : 혼하-요하 중상류" (2020), 동북아역사재단
  12. 谷川道雄, "隋唐帝國形成史論" (1971), 筑摩書房
  13. 田村實造, "中国史上の民族移動期 五胡･北魏時代の政治と社会" (1985), 創文社
  14. 三崎良章, "五胡十六國の基礎的硏究" (2006), 岩波書店
  15. 苗威, "高句麗移民硏究" (2011), 吉林大學出版社
  16. 余昊奎, "세기 후반~4세기 전반 고구려의 교통로와 지방통치조직", 한국사 연구, 91 (1995)
  17. 이기동, "高句麗史 발전의 劃期로서의 4世紀: 慕容‘燕’과의 항쟁을 통해서", 동국사학, 30 (1996)
  18. 여호규, "4세기 동아시아 국제질서와 고구려 대외정책의 변화", 역사와현실, 36 (2000)
  19. 여호규, "百濟의 遼西進出說 再檢討:4세기 후반 扶餘系 人物의 동향과관련하여", 진단학보, 91 (2001)
  20. 孔錫龜, "강좌한국고대사 4" (2003)
  21. 최영래, "北魏初 領民酋長의 地域化와 ｢地域分部制｣", 중국고중세사연구, 10 (2003)
  22. 이춘호, "五胡王朝의 胡人 지배방식과 그 성격 - 大單于의 任職과 單于臺의 설치를 중심으로 -", 동북아역사논총, (31), pp.239~284 (2011), 동북아역사재단
  23. 여호규, "4세기-5세기 초 高句麗와 慕容‘燕’의영역확장과 지배방식 비교", 한국고대사연구, (67), pp.81~123 (2012), 한국고대사학회
  24. 이용일, "戰國時代 列國의 秦 入質 事例", 중국사연구, (84), pp.1~32 (2013), 중국사학회
  25. 박세이, "4세기 慕容鮮卑 前燕의 성장과 고구려의 대응", 한국고대사연구, (73), pp.41~77 (2014), 한국고대사학회
  26. 최진열, "16국시대 遼西의 인구 증감과 前燕･後燕･北魏의 대응, (백제학연구총서 쟁점백제사 7)백제와 요서지역", 한성백제박물관, ~ (2015)
  27. 권은주, "唐代 營州 출신 고구려계 高英淑의 묘지명 검토", 한국고대사연구, (84), pp.347~388 (2016), 한국고대사학회
  28. 박세이, "高句麗와‘ 三燕’의 境界", 고구려발해연구, 54, pp.9~35 (2016), 고구려발해학회
  29. 이정빈, "4세기 전반 고구려의 해양활동과 황해 -고구려와 후조․모용선비의 관계를 중심으로", 역사와 실학, (59), pp.5~41 (2016), 역사실학회
  30. 이성제, "高句麗 遺民의 遼西지역 世居와 존재양상― <高英淑墓誌>의 譯註와 분석 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (46), pp.343~386 (2017), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  31. 이정빈, "모용선비 전연(前燕)의 부여·고구려 질자(質子)", 동북아역사논총, (57), pp.76~114 (2017), 동북아역사재단[DOI]
  32. 이승호, "‘국경’에서 본 5~7세기 삼국의 전쟁 -築城과 戰鬪로 그어진 경계-", 백산학보, (117), pp.223~240 (2020), 백산학회[DOI]
  33. 최진열, "前燕의 關東 정복과 지방 통치", 동양사학연구, (151), pp.75~120 (2020), 동양사학회[DOI]
  34. 윤용구, "북위 평성시대 동이계 이주민", 백제와 북위 학술 심포지엄자료집 (2021), 국립부여박물관
  35. 飯塚勝重, "慕容部の漢人政策についての一考察 : 前燕國成立以前を中心として", 白山史學, 9 (1963), 東洋大學 白山史學會
  36. 關尾史郞, "前燕政權成立(337~370年)の前提", 歷史學硏究, 488 (1981)
  37. 小林聰, "慕容政權の支配構造の特質:政治過程の檢討と支配層の分析を通して", 九州大學東洋史論集, 16 (1988)
  38. 李成市, "新版古代の日本２ アジアからみた古代日本" (1992), 角川書店
  39. 三崎良章, "五胡十六國時代における遼東遼西地方の民族構成の變化について", 敎育と歷史(早稲田大学本庄高等学院研究紀要), 16 (1998), 早稻田大學本庄高等學院
  40. 島田悠, "魏晉南北朝における貴族制の形成と三教･文学" (2011), 汲古書院
  41. 王連龍, "十六国時期高句麗移民族群硏究", 唐代史硏究, 21 (2018)
  42. 史念海, "十六国时期各割据霸主的人口迁徙(上篇)", 中國歷史地理論叢, (3) (1992)
  43. 史念海, "十六国时期各割据霸主的人口迁徙(下篇)", 中國歷史地理論叢, (4) (1992)
  44. 李海叶, "慕容氏辽东政权的“侨土”关系", 内蒙古大学学报(人文社会科学版), 37(3) (2005)
  45. 仇鹿鸣, "侨郡改置与前燕政权中的胡汉关系", 中國歷史地理論叢, 22(4) (2007)
  46. 楊 龍, "试论十六國時期前燕的人口管理", 東北史地, (4) (2008)
  47. 薛海波, "试论4世纪前期慕容燕政权统治下的胡汉流民群体", 東北史地, (6) (2008)
  48. 高然, "五燕史研究", 博士, pp.2010

관련 논문AI추천

4~5세기 高句麗의 中國系 流移民 수용과 그 지배방식안정준규장각한국학연구원 · 한국문화2014 · 제68호4세기대 고구려의 국제관계와 이주민 동향장창은고구려발해학회 · 고구려발해연구2023 · 제77권 高句麗史에 있어서의 이주(migration)와 디아스포라(diaspora)정호섭한국고대학회 · 선사와 고대2017 · 제53호6세기 高句麗의 北魏末 流移民 수용과 ‘遊人’안정준국학연구원 · 동방학지2015 · 제170호4세기 고구려 南·北道를 통해 본 고구려-전연 戰役 재구성신광철국방부군사편찬연구소 · 군사2024 · 제132호6세기 후반~7세기 초반 고구려와 돌궐의 交易과 국제관계김지희규장각한국학연구원 · 한국문화2023 · 제103호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

로마 군대 내에서의 의료신명주pp. 1-35공장노동자와 보건위생― 일본대장성전매국(大藏省專賣局)을 중심으로 ―임채성pp. 37-83일제시기 도립의원(道立醫院)의 설립과 운영(1925-1945)이방원pp. 85-134영국 국민보건서비스(NHS)와 이주민 노동력황혜진pp. 135-163文武王의 安勝 책봉과 그 배경방용철pp. 201-226
원문 보기