본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

儒家公私观在现代社会的意义

The meaning of Confucian Perspectives Regarding Filial Piety as a Public Matter

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류유교학

초록

中文提要:近年来,家庭赡养老人变得越来越困难,因此普遍认为老人的赡 养应该由社会负责,这是建立在社会化养老基础之上的。同样,说起养老,从国 家角度来看可以说公务,而从个人角度来讲就是私事。这种矛盾常常引起赡养家 人概念的混乱。如要寻找解决这种混乱的线索,就先要注重儒家思想中“孝”的 公共的观念(以下简称为儒家孝公观)。笔者在本文中将探讨儒家在现代资本主 义社会的意义。 一般而言,资本主义社会的特征是重视产品生产,从而很自然地出现贬低家 庭的私事领的倾向。由于产品生产原理对每个人的周边关系产生了彻底的影响, 家庭开始在公共社会中孤立、缩小、瓦解。在这种情况下,不管从赡养的角度还 是社会伦理的角度理解“孝”,都会认为儒家的孝公观是“退步的”。 但实际上,在这种社会中儒家的孝公观并非毫无是处。因为如果家庭逃避赡 养老人的责任,马上就会出现赡养老人问题的社会问题。个人主义的深化同样导 致各种各样的社会问题的增加,因此养育儿童过程中慈和孝的感情,就必须增加 和扩大到社会论理层面。资本主义社会家庭定位的下降和瓦解倾向,导致家庭赡 养老人的能力弱化,从而出现赡养老人的社会化问题。扶养的社会化理论是相信 老人问题和养老问题的公共性,但却仍然把孝的问题看做是私人问题。因此,在 这种赡养的社会理论当中,认为儒教所解释的“孝既是公共的养老方式也是社会 伦理”是很陈腐的。 尽管如此,在赡养社会化理论中,依然存在着肯定孝公观的可能性。因为在 同样的赡养老人的问题上,社会赡养是公事,家庭赡养是私事。如果解决这个矛 盾,就先要承认家人赡养老人也是公事。从这个角度,我们可以说儒家的孝公观 是“先觉者的思想”。 另外,儒家的孝公观还是可能克服社会赡养诸多问题的重要思维方式。在社 会赡养中, 赡养者与被赡养者的关系是和产品买卖的关系很相似的。因此,就算 能保证老人的物质问题,却不一定能完全保证精神上的问题。在社会赡养中浪费 了有用的社会资源,就是说,那些与小孩子们一同生活的欢乐也得不到。孝能克 服这种有限的赡养。这种孝就是我们要了解的孝公观。儒家孝公观提供了很有用 启迪。另一方面,伦理上的孝公观也在调整社会赡养局限性等问题上发挥作用。

Abstract

In Confucianism, filial piety is regarded as an important social care method for the elderly, and it is also regarded as a social ethics to maintain social orders. In this matter, filial piety belongs to not only in private but also in public. Could we found any insights on elderly care policy for modern capitalist society from such perspectives? In a capitalist society commodity-production always comes first. A family which only consumes commodities is devalued. In contrast to the industry which produces commodities, a family is considered to be in private. In this context, Confucian filial piety is hard to be supported because filial piety is in private matter, and it cannot be acknowledged as social ethics. In a capitalist society, a family has dissolved, minimized and isolated from the community due to the long term individualization owing to materialization of human relationship. This weakens the foundation of filial piety which is based on a strong emotional human relationship. Therefore, the filial piety may not be maintained as an ethics which is for elderly care and social orders. Further, Confucianism regarding filial piety may be easily considered as 'outdated’. But Confucian filial piety may have different implications regarding a social carefor the elderly. Recently our society pays attention to an elder care issue, because it is harder for a family to take care of their elderly. If people would have more concerns about care issues, it would be a public issue. But a family care is still in private. To resolve that inconsistency we need to find an insight from Confucianism to regard filial piety as a public matter. Social care is fulfilled on the materialized human relationship in labor markets. Though this can ensure the elderly's biological safety, but it cannot solve their psychological comfort. Social care without any family support could be breeding. To complement the vulnerability of social care we need to understand filial piety. And filial piety could cultivate the moral sense of a social carer. Thus we can say that Confucian filial piety is not outdated, but advanced.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. "《??》", ~
  2. "孟子", ~
  3. "《??》", ~
  4. "栗谷全", ~
  5. 友, "中?哲?史" (2000), 范大?出版社
  6. 朴升熙等, "瑞典社?福祉" (2007), 良?院
  7. 朴升熙, "社?福祉政策?:建?美好家" (2006), 成均?大?出版部
  8. 源, "《儒?的孝思想???代社》,《儒?思想硏究》13 ,儒", ~ (2000)
  9. Beck, U., "危?社" (1997), 新波出版社
  10. Beck,U, "Riskogesellschaft:Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne" (1986), Suhrkamp
  11. Marx, K., "Die deutsche Ideologie, Marx?ngels Werke Band" (1983), Dietz Verlarg Berlin
  12. Marx, K., "Das Kapital Ⅰ, Marx?ngels Werke Band 23, Dietz Verlarg Berlin", Dietz Verlarg Berlin, 86~87 (1986)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)